Learning theory explanation of attachment Flashcards
description of learning theory
learning theorists John Dollard and Neal Miller 1950 proposed that caregiver-infant attachment can be explained by learning theory. Their approach is sometimes called ‘cupboard love’ approach because it emphasises the importance of the caregiver as a provider of food
Classical conditioning
unconditioned stimulus (food) — unconditioned response (pleasure
neutral stimulus (mother)— no response
unconditioned+neutral stimuli— uncondtioned response
conditioned stimulus (mother)— conditioned response (pleasure)
operant conditioning
involves learning to repeat behaviour, or not, depending on its consequences. If a behaviour produces a pleasent consequence, that behaviour is likely to be repeated again. - the behaviour has been reinforced.
- operant conditining can explain why babies cry for comfort - feedng.
- when feeding the baby the caregiver recieves negative reinforcment as the crying stops
attachment as a secondary drive
as well as conditioning, learning theory draws on the concept of drive reductuion - hunger can be thought of as a primary drive- it is innate, biological motivator. We are motivated to eat in order to reduce the hunger drive.
— attachment is thus a secondary drive learned by an association between the caregiver and the satisfaction of a primary drive.
evaluation- counter evidence from animal research
lorenz geese imprinted and formed an immediate attachment prior to feeding and maintained regardless of who fed them.
Harlows preferd soft surrogate in preference to a wire one that dispensed milk
-ATACHMENT DOES NOT DEVELOP AS A RESULT OF FEEDING
evaluation counter evidence from human research
research from human infants also shows thhat feeding does not appear to be an important factor in humans. for example in schaffer and emersons study many of the babies developed a primary attachment to their biological mother even though other carers did most the feeding
evaluation- learning theory ignores other factors associated with forming attachments
- in addition, studies have shown that the best quality attachments are with sensitve carers that pick up infant signals and respond appropriately
- it is very hard to reconcile these findings with the idea of cupboard love
- if attachment dependent purely as a result of feeding, there would be no point of complex interactions like reciporicity and interactional synchrony