learning about the social world Flashcards
at what age can children first understand others’ intentions? how is it tested
- 6 months
- tested using violation of expectation paradigm
at what age can children distinguish between intentional and accidental actions?
- 9 months
what is joint attention? when does it emerge?
- the shared attention of 2 people on the same object or event and awareness that they are paying attention to the same thing
- appears at 9-12 months
- difficulty with joint attention indicates ASD
- critical for learning from others
what is imitation? when does it emerge?
- voluntarily matching another person’s behaviour
- appears at 9-12 months
- nativists argue that it is innate because newborns imitate sticking tongue out, but they don’t imitate any other behaviour so it could be coincidental
- critical for observational learning
- active rather than passive, since they imitate the goals of actions rather than the process itself
why is it important to understand intentions?
- step toward understanding the minds of others
- enables joint attention
- enables immitation
what is theory of mind? when does it emerge? how is it tested?
- the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others, and to understand that other people can have desires, knowledge, and beliefs different from one’s own
- emerges around 1 year old
- tested using violation of expectation paradigm
what is sense of self? when does it develop?
- sense of self: fully understand others’ desires requires the appreciation that other people are separate from the self
- we are born with implicit sense of self
- explicit sense of self (eg. recognizing oneself in the mirror) emerges later (1.5-2 years)
at what age can a child predict a character’s actions based on the character’s desires rather than their own desires?
2 years old
at what age do children understand other’s knowledge capabilities?
- 3 years old, at which age they can make judgements about other’s reliability
- 3 and 4 year olds understand that specific people may have specialized knowledge in certain areas
what are false-belief problems? at what age do children understand them? what does this understanding imply?
- tasks that test a chid’s understanding that other people will behave consistently with their knowledge/beliefs, even if their beliefs are false
- most 3 year olds fail, while most 5 year olds pass
- correct responses indicate a developed theory of mind
summarize the timeline for social cognition development
- 6 months: understanding others’ action intentions
- 9-12 months: joint attention and imitation
- 1 year: basic understanding other’s desires
- 1.5-2 years: explicit sense of self (eg. rouge test)
- 2 years old: greater understanding that others’ desires can be different from one’s own
- 3 years: sensitive to whether someone is knowledgeable in a topic or not; basic understanding that beliefs lead to action but fail at false-belief tests
- 5 years: more fully developed theory of mind and pass false-belief tests
what are the three components to theory of mind?
intention, desire, knowledge
are individual differences in social cognitive skills stable?
yes. a child who is better able to understand goal-directed action at 6 months will show better performance on false-belief tests at 4 years
how does the nativist theory explain theory of mind?
innate brain mechanisms are devoted to understanding other people that matures over the first 5 years of life
- newborns have an inherent interest in faces
- culturally universal developmental trajectory of theory of mind
- link between temporoparietal junction (TPJ, active in theory of mind tasks) and ASD, since people with ASD have atypically sized TPJs and often struggle with theory of mind (especially false-belief tests)
what is executive functioning? how does it explain theory of mind?
- set of cognitive processes that enable cognitive control of behaviour, eg. planning, focused attention, multitasking
- false-belief tests require executive functioning skills
- as executive functioning improves, so does theory of mind
- individual differences in executive functioning are responsible for individual differences in theory of mind