Learning about the physical world Flashcards
Describe Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development
- Children are mentally and physically active from birth. This activity leads to development
- Children learn important lessons on their own
- Children are intrinsically motivated to learn and didn’t need rewards
- The new abilities are applied as soon as possible
- The lessons and experiences are reflected in order to develop understandin
- Children have schemas
- Assimilation
- Accomodation
- Equilibrium
Assimilation
Child interprets something new within their pre-existing knowledge.
Accommodation
Child changes schema as a result of new knowledge
Equilibrium
The balance between assimilation and accommodation
Continuity in Development
- Quantitative change
- Developmental change is incremental and gradual
Discontinuity in Development
- Qualitative Change
- A new kind of structure or process emerges that was not there before
What characteristics does Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development have?
- Stage theory
- This is a qualitative (discontinuous) change. Children move from one stage to the other.
- Domain general
- The theory applies to all domains.
- There are brief transitions between stages
- The theory is invariant:
- All children go through the same stages, in the same order and in the same way
What are the stages in Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development?
- Sensorimotor (0 to 2 yo)
- Preoperational (2 to 6 yo)
- Concrete Operational (7 to 11 yo)
- Formal operational (12 to adulthood)
Sensorimotor
- Interact with the environment
- Piaget claimed that infants had no awareness of the existence of objects as something independent from their own actions
- The had no object permanence. In other words, the moment the object would disappear from their view, they would forget about it.
- They only notice object permanence when they are 9 months old (stage 4 of sensorimotor stage)
Preoperational
Starts representing the world symbolically.
Important limitations:
egocentrism, centration
Concrete operational
Learns rules, logic, cannot think in a purely abstract sense.
Formal operational
Transcend the concrete situation and think about the future.
What study lead Piaget to think that infants had no object permanence?
A study made by him, infants were shown a toy. This toy was then hidden under the right cloth multiple times. The baby would over and over lift the cloth to find the toy. The test was, the toy was hidden in the left cloth instead. The baby still reached for the right cloth.
(9 months old)
Describe an alternative study to test object permanence
Renee Baillargeon (1985-1987)
Violation of expectations:
- Show an event to the babies until bored
- show two different events:
- one possible
- one impossible
In this case, the babies would see a plaque move 180 degrees (habituation).
Then a rod was put at the other end.
Possible event, the plaque will stop because of the rod
Impossible event, the plaque will pass the rod.
Carrot Study
Baillargeo and Devos (1991)
- tall and short carrot
- slide W3E1 31
- infants of 3.5 months looked longer at impossible event
A no B error
Even though babies lift the wrong cloth to find the toy, they look at the correct response first. This lead to thinking that babies wanted to please the experimenter by lifting the other cloth.
Topal et al. (2008)
Same task where a toy is hidden and the infant has to uncover it but with 3 conditions:
- communicative (engage with the baby)
- non communicative (do not engage with the baby but the experimenter is visible to the baby)
- non social (the experimenter is invisible to the baby)
They looked correctly to location B more often as the social interaction dicreased.