Learning about the physical world Flashcards

1
Q

Describe Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development

A
  • Children are mentally and physically active from birth. This activity leads to development
  • Children learn important lessons on their own
  • Children are intrinsically motivated to learn and didn’t need rewards
    • The new abilities are applied as soon as possible
    • The lessons and experiences are reflected in order to develop understandin
  • Children have schemas
    • Assimilation
    • Accomodation
    • Equilibrium
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assimilation

A

Child interprets something new within their pre-existing knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Accommodation

A

Child changes schema as a result of new knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Equilibrium

A

The balance between assimilation and accommodation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Continuity in Development

A
  • Quantitative change
  • Developmental change is incremental and gradual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Discontinuity in Development

A
  • Qualitative Change
  • A new kind of structure or process emerges that was not there before
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What characteristics does Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development have?

A
  • Stage theory
    • This is a qualitative (discontinuous) change. Children move from one stage to the other.
  • Domain general
    • The theory applies to all domains.
  • There are brief transitions between stages
  • The theory is invariant:
    • All children go through the same stages, in the same order and in the same way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the stages in Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development?

A
  • Sensorimotor (0 to 2 yo)
  • Preoperational (2 to 6 yo)
  • Concrete Operational (7 to 11 yo)
  • Formal operational (12 to adulthood)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sensorimotor

A
  • Interact with the environment
  • Piaget claimed that infants had no awareness of the existence of objects as something independent from their own actions
  • The had no object permanence. In other words, the moment the object would disappear from their view, they would forget about it.
  • They only notice object permanence when they are 9 months old (stage 4 of sensorimotor stage)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Preoperational

A

Starts representing the world symbolically.

Important limitations:

egocentrism, centration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Concrete operational

A

Learns rules, logic, cannot think in a purely abstract sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Formal operational

A

Transcend the concrete situation and think about the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What study lead Piaget to think that infants had no object permanence?

A

A study made by him, infants were shown a toy. This toy was then hidden under the right cloth multiple times. The baby would over and over lift the cloth to find the toy. The test was, the toy was hidden in the left cloth instead. The baby still reached for the right cloth.

(9 months old)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe an alternative study to test object permanence

A

Renee Baillargeon (1985-1987)

Violation of expectations:

  • Show an event to the babies until bored
  • show two different events:
    • one possible
    • one impossible

In this case, the babies would see a plaque move 180 degrees (habituation).

Then a rod was put at the other end.

Possible event, the plaque will stop because of the rod

Impossible event, the plaque will pass the rod.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Carrot Study

A

Baillargeo and Devos (1991)

  • tall and short carrot
  • slide W3E1 31
  • infants of 3.5 months looked longer at impossible event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A no B error

A

Even though babies lift the wrong cloth to find the toy, they look at the correct response first. This lead to thinking that babies wanted to please the experimenter by lifting the other cloth.

Topal et al. (2008)

Same task where a toy is hidden and the infant has to uncover it but with 3 conditions:

  • communicative (engage with the baby)
  • non communicative (do not engage with the baby but the experimenter is visible to the baby)
  • non social (the experimenter is invisible to the baby)

They looked correctly to location B more often as the social interaction dicreased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Egocentrism

A
  • Perceive the world solely from one’s perspective
  • Talk about what they know
  • Spatial
    • Children will always use themselves as reference point
    • The 3-Mountain task by Piaget, lead him to think this
18
Q

What evidence (if any) there is about perspective-taking by preschoolers?

A
  • They talk differently to younger kids than to adults
  • When they show a toy, they turn the toy to face you
  • They turn a picture so that the person can see it properly
19
Q

Describe a study that is similar to the 3-Mountain task but that is more age appropriate.

A

Broke (1975)

  • Kids were asked to turn the truck to show what another character was seeing.
  • displays slide W3E1 48, 49
  • Results:
    • children were accurate with the scenes
    • children made more mistakes with the 3-mountain task
20
Q

Centration

A
  • Young children often focus on a single feature of an object or event
  • Understanding of concervation
  • When the liquid on a recipient was move to a larger recipient, children would have to say if it was the same amount or not
  • Children would focus on one feature (how tall the glass was)
  • Children lacked the mental operators necessary to consider the relations between different sets of properties
21
Q

Compensation

A

Change on one dimension compensates for a change in other dimensions

22
Q

Reversibility

A

Change can be reversed and situation can be returned to original state.

23
Q

Alternatives to Centration proof

A

Maybe kids were just answering what they were thought was expected from them.

If the change was made by a third person or actor, the kids would answer correctly.

See slide W3E1 57,58

24
Q

Babies and Physics

A

1) Continuity. Objects exist continuously and cannot move from one location to another without travelling the intervening path.
2) Solidity. Physical objects are solid. Each object occupies a unique part of space. Objects cannot interpenetrate each other.
3) Contact. Objects cannot influence other objects without touching them. When one object hits another, it should move.
4) Gravity. Unsupported objects fall toward the ground.
5) Inertia. Objects do not change their motion abruptly unless they are acted on by another force.

25
Q

How did researchers mapped the ages at which infants understand physical concepts?

A

By using violation of expectation paradigms.

26
Q

Causality

A

A leads to B

or

a change in A leads to a change in B

27
Q

Do infants understand causality?

A

Young infants understand that their behaviour can cause outcomes and they modify their behaviours as a result.

28
Q

What study supports the fact that young infants understand that their actions affect the world?

A

Rovee-Collier and Sullivan (1980)

  • 3 months old
  • Reinforcement period:
    • Gently connected to a mobile using a ribbon
29
Q

Mechanistic of causality

A

When adults see one ball hit another, then the second ball moves, they

  • represent two events:
    • A moves and hits B
    • B moves
  • The first ball caused the second one to move
    • spacial continuity
    • temporal continuity
30
Q

What study checks if infants understand mechanistic cause?

A

Alan Leslie made a series of studies that check this:

see W3E3 slides 15- 37

31
Q

Do infants differentiate between a causal and a non-causal event?

A

Yes, see study 1 from Leslie

32
Q

Do infants perceive causality as two events or just as one continuous event?

A

They perceive two events! See study 2 by Leslie

33
Q

Do infants perceive Direct Launch as Causal?

Do they see A causes B or A then B?

A

They see it as A causes B (see study 4 from Leslie)

34
Q

Does experience help infants to represent cause?

A

Yes, see slides W3E3 37 - 46

35
Q

Why do we categorize?

A

Categorization allows us to put together objects or things.

This allows us to understand and manage the world.

36
Q

Concept

A

A concept is a mental representation that encapsulated properties, features and structures that exist among members of a category.

37
Q

True or False

The ability to categorize depends upon concepts.

A

True

38
Q

How do we study categorization in infants?

A
  1. Habituation paradigm
  2. Object-examining paradigm
39
Q

Categories can be broken into a hierarchy, name the different “levels” of categorization.

A
  • Superordinate
  • Basic
  • Subordinate
40
Q

Give an example of a category that is a super

A