League Of Nations Flashcards
Aims of the League of Nations
To preserve world peace
Wilson’s Fourteen Points
To promote international cooperation over a wide range of economic and social problems including disarmament
Permanent Court of International Justice
A large and independent organisation which was closely associated with the League.
What they did:
Offered an arbitration (independent person appointed to settle a dispute) service to countries
Provide legal advice to the council
International Labour Organisation
Large and independent organisation which was closely associated with the League
Under the derivation of the French socialist Albert Thomas achieved some success in the main goal which was to bring an improvement to working conditions.
They collected data on employment practices and published the results and tried to persuade governments to take action by issuing recommendations. This included annual holidays with pat with right to join trade union etc.
They also published information on health and safety in the workplace.
However, some rules were not implanted till later. For example, in USA some bosses were denying their employers the right to join trade unions until 1930s. Even though they did good deeds, their work didn’t help till later and they didn’t it after war because that was the time where most people were vulnerable.
The work of the special commissions groups such as Mandates, Danzig, Minorities, Intellectual cooperation, drug traffic
Mandates Commission - supervised the administration of Germany and Turkey’s former colonies
Danzig Commission - exercised direct League control over the former German city, Danzig
Minorities Commission - attempted to bring about a general improvement in the way that some racial minorities were ill treated
Intellectual Cooperation Organisation - promoted cultural exchanges and intellectual contact between academies, artists and writers
Special committee for drug traffic - campaigned to reduce drug misuse and drug smuggling.
Members of the League of Nations and who wasn’t invited and why
United States:
US didn’t join because a majority in the American Senate thought that the League would drag their country into future wars and disputes.
Germany:
They were not allowed to join until they had demonstrated its peaceful intentions. This had to effect of making the League look like a club for the victorious powers from the war. They were allowed to join in 1926 and became an permanent member. They left when Adolf Hitler’s first polity action was to take Germany out of the League in 1933.
Soviet Russia:
They weren’t allowed to join because they were communist and committed to the overthrow of capitalism. They didn’t want to join following the Russia Civil War after Britain, France and Japan didn’t assist them. They joined in 1934 but were expelled in 1939 following the invasion of Finland
Japan:
They were one of the original members but left in 1933 when it received criticism for invading Manchuria
Britain and France:
They were the only major countries who stayed a member. They were shouldered with the responsibility to try make the League work. However their minds were elsewhere. Britain was trying to maintain their empire and France was focused on their security. The League often took second place in their minds.
Secretariat
Civil service of the League
Performed all the administrative and financial work such as organising conferences, distributing agendas, monitoring budgets, publishing reports etc.
Assembly
Considered matters of general policy
Take votes and each member of the League had one vote
Controlled the League’s budget
Admitted new members
Elected non- permanent members of the Council.
Council
Executive body of the League
Had permanent and non-permanent members
In 1920, permanent members included Britain, France, Italy and Japan
In 1926, Germany became a permanent member
Number of non permanent members increased from 4 in 1920 to 11 in 1936.
Strength of the League in terms of organisation and structure
Major powers of the world were part of the League. This meant they didn’t have to think twice if they should attack a country as they had the power.
Their structure was successful. We can tell because they use a similar structure in the UN right now. First time thinking of a structure like this and was a success.
Weaknesses of the League of Nations in terms of organisation and structure
Major countries weren’t invited. For example, US not being invited was a big blow for the League as they were deprived of the world’s most powerful, influential and wealthy country. This meant that the ability of the League to attack big countries were affected. Soviet Russia not being part of the League was another big blow as they could have helped with the Manchuria crisis as they were close to them where as Lytton had to come from America.
Unanimous decisions
Lack of an army
Sanctions not being used
Collective Security
Intentions were to maintain peace. There were three stages that could be followed to stop an aggressive power.
- Moral disapproval:
Following an act of agression, the Council would meet and vote to condemn the action. The agressive country knowing that it had the weight of the world opinion, they might drop their agressive action - Economic Sanctions:
If the previous stage failed, the Council would impose economic sanctions. This meant arranging a trade boycott and refusing credit. This means to stop trading goods with that country. - Military Sanctions:
If the previous stage failed then the Council would impose military sanctions. This might involve sending an army to assist the victim of the agression.
In theory, this system seemed promising to preserve peace. But the absence of the US would reduce the effectiveness of all the stages.
Unanimous decisions
All decisions made by the Assembly and the Council had to be unanimous which means two or more people have to agree with the decision. If someone disagreed with the motion then it would fail. A majority even wasn’t enough.
This made it difficult to take action against a country.
Lack of an army
The League didn’t have a army of its own. This meant that the League didn’t have standing forces to call upon to impose military sanctions. This meant that the members were asked to contribute towards a military force, the army would take time and there was no guarantee that an army could be assembled. This meant that the military sanctions weren’t taken seriously and people would just carry on threatening world peace.
Successes at peacekeeping in the 1920s - Aaland Islands
First dispute to be resolved by the League concerned the rival claims of Sweden and Finland to the Aaland Islands. Most of the islanders wanted to be ruled by Sweden. - 1921
The League investigated the matter and gave the islands to Finland but with protection for the islanders including demilitarisation which meant Sweden and Finland couldn’t fight about it. Sweden accepted their judgement.
Successes at peacekeeping in the 1920s - Upper Silesia
Upper Silesia was a valuable industrial area and they were located on the border between Germany and Poland. It was originally given to Poland due to ToV but the Germans protested and it was agreed to hold a vote in the area. - 1921
The results of the vote suggested it should be given to Germany but in some rural parts of the territory, there was a clear majority of votes for Poland
Following protests, the League suggested a partition which they accepted. Eastern Upper Silesia was given to Poland and Western Upper Silesia was given to Germany.
Successes at peacekeeping in the 1920s - Mosul
1924 - Turkey claimed the Kurdish populated province of Mosul which was part of the British territory of Iraq.
The League investigated the problem and made an award in favour of Iraq. Turkey accepted the judgement.