Leadership Flashcards

1
Q

What is leadership?

A
  • Buchanan & Huczynski (2019: 610) [t]he process of influencing the activities of an organised group in its efforts towards goal setting and goal achievement”.
  • Many definitions exist, with little agreement in the literature (or among practitioners) about what leadership is and how you identify it, measure it, study it or develop it.

The definition includes both “goal setting” and “goal achievement”. This means that leadership involves the process of inspiring others with a new goal or vision that they feel emotionally invested in working towards, not just a process of securing compliance with tasks required to meet existing goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between leadership and management?

A

Bennis (1989) created a much-quoted distinction between management and leadership:

Managers “do things right”.
Leaders “do the right thing”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are leaders?

A

Understood as the ‘visionaries’ who inspire and enthuse others and drive new initiatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are managers?

A

Understood as the ‘engineers’ who ensure the ‘machine’ keeps working: checking, monitoring and maintaining the organisation to ensure stability and order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 main components associated with leadership?

A
  • Establishes direction - Creates a vision, sets strategies
  • Aligns people - Communicates goals
  • Motivated and inspires - Empowers employees.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 main components associated with management?

A
  • Planning and budgeting - Sets timetables
  • Organising and staffing - Provides structure
  • Controlling and problem solving - Develops incentives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Birkinshaw (2010) criticise Bennis (1989)?

A

Bennis views managers as those who focus on efficiency, follow the rules and accepts status quo, while leaders focus on effectiveness and challenging the rules. Whilst Birkinshaw says motivating people lies beyond the job description of a manager and doing things right vs doing the right thing is an unhelpful distinction. Surely we should all be doing both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the leadership theories?

A
  1. Trait theories
  2. Contingency theories of leadership style
    - Tannenbaum & Schmidt
    - Hersey & Blanchard
  3. Transformational leadership
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are trait theories of leadership?

A

As early as the mid 1800s, researchers sought to study great leaders from history to identify the personality traits that made them effective leaders. This became known as the great man theory as they focused on the typical male military and political leaders. The theory proposed that the fate of humanity lay in the hands of certain special men who were born natural leaders. This is also known as trait spotting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the key trait research studies?

A
  1. Stogdill (1948): Alertness, responsibility
  2. Mann (1959): Intelligence, masculinity
  3. Stogdill (1974): Achievement, sociability
  4. Lord et al (1984): Intelligence, masculinity
  5. Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991): Drive, Confidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the great man theory?

A

Great man theory focused on political figures, arguing that leaders reach positions of influence from which they dominate and direct the lives of others by force of personality. There is no equivalent ‘great woman theory’. Great men are born leaders, and emerge to take power, regardless of the social, organisational or historical context. Research thus focused on identifying the traits of these special individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the challenge of trait theory and the ending of trait theory?

A
  • 50 years of study have failed to produce one personality trait or set of qualities that can be used to discriminate between leaders and non leaders.
  • Trait theory was abandoned by many (but not all) leadership scholars after the 1940s.
  • Despite widespread criticism of trait theory, it still has its advocates amongst contemporary scholars.
  • Some studies are gender, even racially, biased, while many more are focused on a rather narrow, albeit at the time often majority, section of the management workforce in North America and the United Kingdom – white males.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Do women have the wrong traits?

A

Women today are under-represented in leadership and management roles, despite attempts to improve gender balance. In 2008, Norway set a mandatory target of 40% for female representation on the boards of listed companies. Belgium, France and Italy followed with similar quotas, with sanctions for non-compliance. Germany, Spain and The Netherlands have quotas for female directors, but no sanctions. In 2011, the UK set a voluntary target of 25 per cent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Stogdill critique?

A
  • If a leader in one situation might not be a leader in another situation, it makes little sense to identify the traits they have because those traits might not help them be a ‘leader’ in that other situation.
  • Example: those considered good leaders in one organisational department might not be considered good leaders in other departments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the 30% club?

A

The 30% Club was founded in the UK in 2010, and has branches in many other countries. Their goal was to achieve at least 30 per cent female representation on the boards of the FTSE 100 companies. Research by The 30% Club (2018, p.2) found that female and male managers describe their jobs differently: ‘Female managers appear more attuned to managing relationship dynamics and more positive about diversity within their team. Male managers appear more attuned to managing performance dynamics and more positive about consistency within their team’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the glass ceiling?

A
  • A glass ceiling is a metaphor usually applied to people of marginalised genders, used to represent an invisible barrier that prevents an oppressed demographic from rising beyond a certain level in a hierarchy.
  • Michelle Ryan and Alexander Haslam (2005, 2007) argue that women promoted to senior roles face another set of problems – concerning what they call the ‘glass cliff’. Their research found that companies are more likely to change the composition of their boards of directors when performance drops, than when it is improving.
17
Q

What are the contingency theories of leadership style?

A

Researchers began to ask how aspects of the context shape what is viewed as an effective way of leading. Contingency theories of leadership were developed by those who rejected the idea there was one best way of leading. Best style of leadership depended on the features of the context or situation.

18
Q

What is Tannenbaum and Schmidt’s leadership style continuum?

A
  • Tannenbaum & Schmidt (1958) rejected the ‘one best way’ approach, which proposed that more participative and democratic leadership styles were inherently superior.
  • They proposed that effective leaders had to operate on a continuum between more ‘autocratic’ and more ‘democratic’ leadership styles, depending on the situation.
  • Autocratic tells, democratic joins.
  • It’s too simplistic and only goes off two variables.
19
Q

What is Tannenbaum & Schmidt’s 3 forces?

A
  • Leader forces: The personality, values and preferences of the leader and beliefs the leader has about the level of confidence in subordinates and degree of employee participation needed.
  • Follower forces: Degree to which followers have a need for independence, a tolerance for ambiguity, knowledge of the problem and expectations about involvement.
  • Situation forces: The complexity of the problem, the importance of the decision, time pressure to make the decision, the norms of the organisation, and the effectiveness of those groups in team working (i.e. solving problems and resolving conflicts themselves).
20
Q

What are the implications of contingency theories?

A

Diagnosing the situation before they act to identify what kind of leadership style would be the best ‘fit’ for the situation. Adapting their style to suit the situation. In other words, leaders need to be like a ‘chameleon’ and be able to change their leadership style to fit their setting.

21
Q

What is Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership theory?

A

Proposed that leaders should determine the most effective leadership style for the contingencies of the type of situation they face.
They specifically focused on how ‘ready’ the followers were to ‘lead’ themselves (e.g. make decisions and have a sense of direction).

22
Q

What is follower readiness?

A
  • Hersey and Blanchard (1977) highlighted the need to consider the stage of development (or ‘readiness’) of the followers, which they broke down into “ability” and “willingness”.
  • “Ability” refers to how competent the followers are in doing their tasks.
  • Ask: do followers have the ability to do the job to the required standard?
  • “Willingness” refers to how confident and committed followers are in getting on with the job themselves. Followers might be competent at their job (i.e. have ability), but be not willing to ‘lead’ themselves.
  • Ask: do followers have the confidence to make decisions themselves and the commitment to achieving the organisation’s aims or goals?
23
Q

What are the 4 permutations of follower ‘readiness?

A

R1: Unable and unwilling
R2: Unable but willing
R3: Able but unwilling
R4: Able and willing

24
Q

What are Hershey and Blanchards leader behaviour dimensions?

A
  • Directive behaviour: This is the degree to which the leader directs the behaviour of followers by instructing them on how to complete tasks.
  • Supportive behaviour: This is the degree to which the leader gives social consideration and emotional support to followers.
25
Q

What are the components of Hersey-Blanchard’s model?

A
  • S1 Telling: Instruct and direct followers about what tasks to do and how to do them.
  • S2 Selling: Persuade, reassure and encourage followers to do the tasks you ask them to and how you want them to do it.
  • S3 Participating: Involve and consult with followers about what tasks to do and how to do them.
  • S4 Delegating: Empower and trust followers to have full responsibility to decide what to do and how to do it.
26
Q

What are the implications of situational leadership theory?

A
  • Leaders need to adapt their style between teams they lead according to the degree of ‘follower readiness’ in those teams.
  • Leaders also need to change their leadership style over time as teams (or team members) develop their ability and/or willingness.
27
Q

What is transformational leadership?

A
  • The theory focused on the skills and abilities the leader displayed (without assuming they were genetically inherited traits). Importantly, the theory also tried to identify the effects of leaders on followers. An example is Nelson Mandella.
  • Historian James MacGregor Burns was the first to use the term ‘transforming’ in his 1978 book Leadership.
  • Burns (1978) reviewed the great political, military, social and
    intellectual leaders of history to establish what made them so influential.
  • The issues is that its mostly observable and is difficult to measure.
28
Q

What is the difference between transformational vs transactional leadership?

A
  • Transformational leaders inspire followers to have emotional attachments to the common goal/values and work passionately towards it.
  • Transactional leaders gain compliance from followers, but no emotional attachment or passion.
29
Q

What are the 4 I’s of transformational leaders?

A

Bass & Riggio (2006) claimed that four elements characterise the effects of transformational leaders on followers:

  • Idealised influence
  • Intellectual stimulation
  • Inspirational motivation
  • Individualised consideration
30
Q

What is the dark side of transformational leadership?

A
  • Tourish (2013) argues that transformational leadership actually incentivises leaders toward hubris, narcissism and poor decision making, with often disastrous and even lethal effects for followers in cases such as the Jonestown or Heaven’s Gate cults and corporate fraud of Enron.
  • Tourish points to studies which show how a sense of being powerful
    inclines people to hypocrisy, cheating, risky behaviour and a sense of entitlement.
31
Q

What is destructive leadership?

A
  • ‘Petty tyrants’ (Ashforth, 1994);
  • ‘Toxic leadership’ (Benson & Hogan, 2008; Whicker, 1996);
  • ‘Destructive leadership’ (Einarsen, Aasland, & Skogstad, 2007);
32
Q

What is bad leadership?

A

There is a tendency to present leaders as heroes in Western management texts. This ignores the darker side of leadership.

33
Q

What is the toxic triangle?

A

1.Destructive leaders: Charisma
2. Susceptible followers: Conformers and colluders
3. Conductive environments: Instability

34
Q

What are the leadership theories in practice?

A
  • Cazier and McInnis studied 192 CEOs who had been brought in from outside between 1993 and 2005.
  • They discovered that companies usually recruit CEOs from companies that have done well in the past, and that they usually give them a big pay increase.
  • However, the pay increase is negatively correlated with the future performance of the firm that does the hiring.
  • In other words: the more dazzling the outside recruit, the worse
    they perform in their new role.