LE4 - Antepartum Flashcards
A 32 y/o G2P2 at 35 weeks gestation presents with painful vaginal bleeding, uterine tenderness, and a rigid abdomen. The fetal heart rate is 100 bpm, and the mother is hypotensive.
Questions:
What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Placenta previa
B. Abruptio placenta
C. Uterine rupture
D. Vasa previa
What is the appropriate management for this patient?
A. Vaginal delivery with expectant management
B. Emergency cesarean delivery
C. Administer tocolytics and observe
D. Administer corticosteroids and delay delivery
B. Abruptio placenta
Rationale: Painful vaginal bleeding, uterine tenderness, and fetal distress are hallmark features of abruptio placenta.
B. Emergency cesarean delivery
Rationale: An emergency cesarean delivery is indicated in severe abruptio placenta with fetal distress to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.
A 29 y/o G1P0 at 30 weeks gestation presents with mild vaginal bleeding and a stable maternal and fetal condition. Ultrasound shows a retroplacental hematoma.
Questions:
What is the most appropriate management in this case?
A. Immediate cesarean delivery
B. Expectant management with close monitoring
C. Administer uterotonics to expedite delivery
D. Perform emergency vaginal delivery
What laboratory test is most critical in monitoring this patient?
A. Complete blood count (CBC)
B. Coagulation studies (PT, PTT, fibrinogen)
C. Renal function tests
D. Liver enzymes
B. Expectant management with close monitoring
Rationale: In stable maternal and fetal conditions before 34 weeks, expectant management aims to prolong pregnancy while closely monitoring for signs of deterioration.
B. Coagulation studies (PT, PTT, fibrinogen)
Rationale: Abruptio placenta increases the risk of consumptive coagulopathy (DIC); coagulation studies are essential for early detection.
A 40 y/o G5P4 with chronic hypertension and a history of placental abruption presents at 28 weeks with recurrent vaginal bleeding and reduced amniotic fluid on ultrasound.
Questions:
What is the term for the co-occurrence of placental abruption and oligohydramnios?
A. Chronic abruption-oligohydramnios sequence
B. Preterm premature rupture of membranes
C. Hydramnios syndrome
D. Fetal growth restriction
What is the recommended management for this patient?
A. Immediate delivery regardless of gestational age
B. Expectant management with corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity
C. Uterine artery embolization
D. Administer tocolytics and continue monitoring
A. Chronic abruption-oligohydramnios sequence
Rationale: This condition occurs when chronic abruption leads to reduced amniotic fluid due to poor placental function.
B. Expectant management with corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity
Rationale: In stable conditions, expectant management with corticosteroids improves fetal outcomes by enhancing lung maturity.
A 35 y/o G3P2 at 37 weeks presents with sudden painful vaginal bleeding and a non-reassuring fetal heart rate. She reports a history of cocaine use during pregnancy.
Questions:
What is the most likely cause of her placental abruption?
A. Hypertension
B. Cocaine use
C. Trauma
D. Placenta previa
What complication is most associated with concealed hemorrhage in abruptio placenta?
A. Uterine rupture
B. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
C. Preterm labor
D. Maternal fever
B. Cocaine use
Rationale: Cocaine use causes vasoconstriction, increasing the risk of placental abruption.
B. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
Rationale: Concealed hemorrhage increases the risk of DIC due to placental thromboplastin entering the maternal circulation.
A 38 y/o G4P3 with preeclampsia presents at 34 weeks gestation with vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. The fetus has died in utero.
Questions:
What is the preferred mode of delivery in this case?
A. Emergency cesarean delivery
B. Vaginal delivery with uterotonics
C. Hysterectomy
D. Expectant management
What is the major risk during delivery in this scenario?
A. Fetal distress
B. Maternal coagulopathy
C. Premature rupture of membranes
D. Infection
B. Vaginal delivery with uterotonics
Rationale: Vaginal delivery is preferred in cases of fetal demise as it reduces maternal morbidity compared to cesarean delivery.
B. Maternal coagulopathy
Rationale: Placental abruption increases the risk of DIC, especially in cases of fetal death, necessitating careful monitoring of coagulation status.
A 28 y/o G1P0 at 32 weeks gestation presents with mild vaginal bleeding, stable vital signs, and a reactive fetal heart rate tracing. The ultrasound shows a retroplacental hematoma.
Questions:
What is the most appropriate management for this patient?
A. Immediate cesarean delivery
B. Induction of labor
C. Expectant management
D. Uterine artery embolization
Why is expectant management appropriate in this scenario?
A. The fetus is preterm, and delaying delivery may benefit fetal outcomes
B. The retroplacental hematoma will resolve without intervention
C. Delivery is contraindicated in cases of stable placental abruption
D. Tocolytics can prevent further abruption
C. Expectant management
Rationale: For stable maternal and fetal conditions before 34 weeks, expectant management aims to prolong pregnancy while monitoring closely for deterioration.
A. The fetus is preterm, and delaying delivery may benefit fetal outcomes
Rationale: Expectant management allows for fetal lung maturation, particularly when corticosteroids are administered, improving neonatal outcomes.
A 35 y/o G3P2 at 35 weeks gestation presents with painful vaginal bleeding, uterine contractions, and a category II fetal heart rate tracing. The mother is hemodynamically stable.
Questions:
What is the recommended management for this patient?
A. Administer tocolytics and delay delivery
B. Vaginal delivery if imminent
C. Emergent cesarean delivery
D. Expectant management with corticosteroids
Why is emergent delivery indicated at this gestational age?
A. The fetus is preterm, and expectant management is contraindicated
B. Late preterm infants have outcomes similar to term infants
C. Tocolysis is contraindicated in placental abruption
D. Vaginal delivery is always contraindicated in placental abruption
C. Emergent cesarean delivery
Rationale: At 35 weeks with fetal compromise, emergent delivery ensures the best outcomes for both the mother and fetus.
B. Late preterm infants have outcomes similar to term infants
Rationale: At 34–36 weeks, late preterm infants have survival rates nearly identical to term infants, especially with antenatal corticosteroids for lung maturity.
A 40 y/o G5P4 at 28 weeks gestation presents with painful vaginal bleeding and uterine tenderness. Fetal monitoring shows a non-reassuring heart rate pattern.
Questions:
What is the next best step in management?
A. Expectant management with close monitoring
B. Administer corticosteroids and delay delivery
C. Emergency cesarean delivery
D. Tocolysis to prolong pregnancy
Why is expectant management not appropriate in this case?
A. The fetus is preterm, and delivery will worsen outcomes
B. Severe abruption requires immediate intervention regardless of gestational age
C. Corticosteroids are contraindicated in preterm pregnancies with bleeding
D. Tocolysis is the only option for prolonging pregnancy
C. Emergency cesarean delivery
Rationale: Non-reassuring fetal status in the context of placental abruption necessitates emergent delivery to prevent further fetal compromise.
B. Severe abruption requires immediate intervention regardless of gestational age
Rationale: Severe placental abruption mandates immediate delivery to address both maternal and fetal risks.
A 25 y/o G2P1 at 30 weeks gestation presents with recurrent vaginal bleeding and reduced amniotic fluid. Both the mother and fetus are stable.
Questions:
What term describes the combination of placental abruption and oligohydramnios in this patient?
A. Chronic abruption-oligohydramnios sequence
B. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
C. Severe placental abruption
D. Hydramnios syndrome
What is the recommended management for this condition?
A. Immediate cesarean delivery
B. Induction of labor
C. Expectant management with corticosteroids
D. Uterine artery embolization
A. Chronic abruption-oligohydramnios sequence
Rationale: This sequence occurs when chronic abruption leads to reduced amniotic fluid due to impaired placental function.
C. Expectant management with corticosteroids
Rationale: In stable maternal and fetal conditions, expectant management allows time for fetal lung maturity while monitoring for complications.
A 38 y/o G4P3 presents at 29 weeks with placental abruption and painful contractions. Fetal monitoring shows a stable heart rate pattern, but the mother develops tachycardia and hypotension.
Questions:
What is the primary indication for expeditious delivery in this patient?
A. Preterm labor
B. Maternal hemodynamic instability
C. Oligohydramnios
D. Stable fetal heart rate
What is the recommended delivery mode in this situation?
A. Expectant management to stabilize maternal condition
B. Vaginal delivery if possible
C. Emergency cesarean delivery
D. Uterine artery embolization
B. Maternal hemodynamic instability
Rationale: Maternal instability is a critical indication for expeditious delivery to prevent further deterioration.
C. Emergency cesarean delivery
Rationale: In the presence of maternal instability, cesarean delivery is preferred for rapid intervention and improved outcomes.
A 29 y/o G2P1 at 32 weeks gestation presents with painless vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound reveals a placenta completely covering the internal cervical os. The mother is stable, and the fetal heart rate is normal.
Questions:
What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Placenta previa (total)
B. Placental abruption
C. Vasa previa
D. Marginal placenta previa
What is the appropriate next step in management for this patient?
A. Emergency cesarean delivery
B. Hospital admission with close monitoring
C. Vaginal delivery with oxytocin augmentation
D. Expectant management at home
A. Placenta previa (total)
Rationale: Total placenta previa is diagnosed when the placenta completely covers the internal os, causing painless bleeding and precluding vaginal delivery.
B. Hospital admission with close monitoring
Rationale: For stable patients with placenta previa, hospital admission and close monitoring are indicated to prolong pregnancy while preparing for delivery in case of severe bleeding.
A 34 y/o G3P2 at 36 weeks gestation with a history of previous cesarean section presents with painless vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound reveals an anterior placenta previa.
Questions:
What is the greatest risk associated with this condition?
A. Preterm labor
B. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)
C. Postpartum hemorrhage
D. Coagulopathy
What is the recommended delivery approach for this patient?
A. Vaginal delivery under close observation
B. Elective cesarean delivery at 37 weeks
C. Expectant management until spontaneous labor
D. Vertical laparotomy and hysterectomy
B. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)
Rationale: Anterior placenta previa in women with a history of cesarean section significantly increases the risk of PAS, which involves abnormal placental invasion.
B. Elective cesarean delivery at 37 weeks
Rationale: Cesarean delivery at 37 weeks is recommended to minimize risks of hemorrhage and preterm complications while ensuring maternal and fetal safety.
A 30 y/o G4P3 at 28 weeks gestation presents with painless vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound reveals a low-lying placenta 1.5 cm from the internal os.
Questions:
How is this condition classified?
A. Complete placenta previa
B. Partial placenta previa
C. Low-lying placenta
D. Marginal previa
What is the best course of action for this patient?
A. Immediate cesarean delivery
B. Expectant management with follow-up ultrasound
C. Induction of labor at 32 weeks
D. Administration of uterotonics
C. Low-lying placenta
Rationale: A low-lying placenta is defined as a placental edge within 2 cm of the internal os but not covering it, as seen in this case.
B. Expectant management with follow-up ultrasound
Rationale: Low-lying placentas may resolve as pregnancy progresses. Follow-up ultrasound at 32 weeks is recommended to reassess placental location.
A 37 y/o G5P4 at 38 weeks gestation presents with profuse painless vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound confirms placenta previa, and the fetus is in cephalic presentation.
Questions:
What is the immediate management for this patient?
A. Attempt vaginal delivery
B. Emergency cesarean delivery
C. Expectant management with corticosteroids
D. Uterine artery embolization
What is the main complication during cesarean delivery in this condition?
A. Uterine rupture
B. Coagulopathy
C. Severe hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy
D. Preterm labor
B. Emergency cesarean delivery
Rationale: In cases of placenta previa with active bleeding near term, cesarean delivery is the safest option for both mother and fetus.
C. Severe hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy
Rationale: Placenta previa significantly increases the risk of severe hemorrhage during cesarean delivery, especially when associated with placenta accreta spectrum.
A 28 y/o G2P1 at 20 weeks gestation is diagnosed with a placenta previa on routine ultrasound. She is asymptomatic and has no bleeding.
Questions:
What is the likelihood that the placenta previa will resolve by term?
A. 10%
B. 30%
C. 50%
D. >90%
What is the next step in monitoring this patient?
A. Reassess at 32 weeks with ultrasound
B. Perform transvaginal ultrasound immediately
C. Plan for cesarean delivery at 37 weeks
D. No further monitoring is needed
D. >90%
Rationale: Most cases of placenta previa diagnosed early in pregnancy resolve due to placental “migration” as the lower uterine segment develops.
A. Reassess at 32 weeks with ultrasound
Rationale: Follow-up ultrasound at 32 weeks is the standard approach to monitor placental position and plan delivery accordingly.
A 35 y/o G4P3 at 36 weeks gestation presents with painless vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound reveals a placenta completely covering the internal cervical os.
Questions:
How is this condition classified?
A. Low-lying placenta
B. Marginal placenta previa
C. Partial placenta previa
D. Complete placenta previa
What is the recommended mode of delivery for this patient?
A. Vaginal delivery with close monitoring
B. Elective cesarean delivery at 37 weeks
C. Expectant management until labor begins
D. Emergency cesarean hysterectomy
D. Complete placenta previa
Rationale: Complete placenta previa is diagnosed when the placenta entirely covers the internal cervical os, preventing vaginal delivery.
B. Elective cesarean delivery at 37 weeks
Rationale: Cesarean delivery is recommended to prevent complications such as severe bleeding during labor, especially for complete placenta previa.
A 28 y/o G2P1 at 34 weeks gestation is diagnosed with a placenta partially covering the internal os. The mother is stable, and the fetal heart rate is reassuring.
Questions:
What is the classification of this condition?
A. Complete placenta previa
B. Partial placenta previa
C. Low-lying placenta
D. Marginal placenta previa
What surgical approach is preferred if cesarean delivery is needed in this patient?
A. Low transverse hysterotomy
B. Vertical uterine incision
C. Vertical laparotomy incision
D. Uterine artery embolization
B. Partial placenta previa
Rationale: Partial placenta previa occurs when the placenta partially covers the internal cervical os, posing complications for vaginal delivery.
A. Low transverse hysterotomy
Rationale: A low transverse hysterotomy is typically the preferred surgical approach unless the placenta is anterior, requiring alternative incisions.
A 30 y/o G1P0 at 29 weeks gestation is diagnosed with a placenta located 1.8 cm from the internal cervical os. She has had no bleeding episodes so far.
Questions:
How is this condition classified?
A. Complete placenta previa
B. Partial placenta previa
C. Low-lying placenta
D. Marginal placenta previa
What is the next step in managing this patient?
A. Expectant management with follow-up ultrasound at 32 weeks
B. Immediate cesarean delivery
C. Induction of labor at 34 weeks
D. Administer uterotonics to expedite delivery
C. Low-lying placenta
Rationale: A low-lying placenta is defined as a placental edge within 2 cm of the internal cervical os but not covering it, as seen in this case.
A. Expectant management with follow-up ultrasound at 32 weeks
Rationale: Low-lying placentas may resolve due to placental “migration.” Ultrasound at 32 weeks can re-evaluate placental position.
A 38 y/o G5P4 presents at 37 weeks with significant painless vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound reveals an anterior placenta previa completely covering the internal os.
Questions:
What is a major surgical risk if a cesarean delivery is performed?
A. Uterine rupture
B. Fetal distress
C. Severe hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy
D. Preterm labor
What surgical incision is preferred to minimize complications if the placenta is anterior?
A. Vertical laparotomy incision
B. Vertical uterine incision
C. Low transverse hysterotomy
D. Midline episiotomy
C. Severe hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy
Rationale: Placenta previa, particularly with an anterior location, increases the risk of severe bleeding during cesarean delivery, sometimes requiring hysterectomy.
B. Vertical uterine incision
Rationale: A vertical uterine incision avoids cutting through the anterior placenta, reducing the risk of excessive bleeding and fetal complications.
A 25 y/o G3P2 at 20 weeks gestation is diagnosed with a low-lying placenta on routine ultrasound. She has no symptoms or risk factors for placental abnormalities.
Questions:
What is the likelihood that this condition will resolve by term?
A. 10%
B. 30%
C. 50%
D. >90%
When should the next ultrasound assessment be performed?
A. At 24 weeks
B. At 28 weeks
C. At 32 weeks
D. No further ultrasound is needed
D. >90%
Rationale: Most cases of low-lying placenta diagnosed early in pregnancy resolve due to placental “migration” as the lower uterine segment develops.
C. At 32 weeks
Rationale: Follow-up ultrasound at 32 weeks is recommended to assess whether the placenta has moved away from the internal cervical os.