LCDMI memorise (Crime) Flashcards
Consorting Amendment and what it did
2012 Crimes Amendment (consorting and organised crime)- Police can punish people for up to 3 years for consorting
Consorting SMH article 2014 title
‘Motorcycle gang laws overwhelmingly target Indigenous Australians, police watch dog reveals’
Consorting laws 2014 article LECC details
“The LECC (law enforcement conduct commission) found that within the first year of the introduction of the law that 40% of people subjected to it were indigenous”
Consorting (Ombudsmen 2016)
By 2016 the ombudsman found that there was no change instead concluding that the first 100 warnings were wrongfully issued
Search and Seziure Amendment
Law enforcement (powers and responsibilities) Amendment (search powers) Act 2009
Buttrose article title
‘Buttrose charged after cocaine cash raid’ SMH 2009
Buttrose article details
“Raids on his property in Darlinghurst and Paddington uncovered cocaine with a street value of up to 10 million and 1.3 million in cash” - highlights effectiveness of covert searches (use of warrants)
Strip searching article
Community Legal Centre 2021 Article ‘Rethinking Strip searching’
Details of article
“Less than 16.5% of charges result in charges of drug supply”
SMH 2016 ‘The dogs dont work’
“The NSW police force has spent over $66million on their drug detection unit since 2010”
Dogs dont work 2014 stats
of all of the ~15,000 searches conducted in 2014 74% of them resulted in no drugs being found
Covid powers
Civil Defence Emergency Act 2002- gave police the power to prosecute people if they breach rules
Covid article 2021
“Ridiculous: NSW police accused of handing out unfair covid fines and targeting young people”
Terrorism amendment
Terrorism (police powers) amendement (investigative detention) bill 2016
What does the terrorism bill do and what does it remove
People suspected of terrorism can be detained for up to 14 days without charge- this removes the presumption of innocence (impinges on rights)
Reporting Crimes SA BOSCAR stats comparison
2019 was ~ 14,000 and 2023 was ~16,000
Why has there been a shift in states
2022 Affirmative consent bill and Chanel Contos advocating for better education (still isnt good enough- needs more programmes)
Crime stoppers Covid- programme and article
Crime stoppers introduced ‘Strike force Travel stop’ during covid to assist with breaches of rules + SMH 2021 “strike force travel stop has already issued mulitiple $1000 infringement notices” - this was in relation to the illegal marourba party during lockdown
Crime stoppers ‘Dob in a Dealer’ introduced 2016
An anonmyous platform to report methamphetamine and drug related crime
According to the crime stoppers website
Between 2018-2019 there was a 65% increase in drug related reports
Meanwhile a 2019 City Hub article stated in relation to the campagin that
“almost all evidence suggests that further criminalisation of drugs causes harm as it forces drug supply underground leading to more toxic and harmful substances being supplied and suppliers being rewarded due to the risk of supplying” Dr from NSW council of liberties
The aspects of investigating crime and why they are important
The conviction of the accused pertain to the effectiveness of the investigative process:
Gathering evidence
To support the charges in court
Use of technology
To effectively prove all charges
Conduction of Search and Seizure
To ensure all evidence of the crime are accounted for
Use of Warrants
To gather all potential evidence
Evidence Act?
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - All evidence must be obtained lawfully and not obstruct the rights of civilians
Obtaining evidence article on DNA
2020 ABC article discusses how the DNA of the Claremont serial killings was contaminated by scientists
R v Jama 2009
Jama was wrongfully convicted of sexually assault on the sole basis of DNA evidence
Murder of victorian women- accused wasnt sentenced due to inadmissible evidence
“The murder of a woman whos bloodied body was found by her 5 year old son will never be solved due to a “laboratory bungle” that ruined the DNA found in her home”
Use of technology- CCTV
R v Loveridge - CCTV footage captured the fatal punch that killed Thomas Kelly - sentenced to 4 years imprisonment and lead to mandatory sentencing law surrounding crimes of intoxication
Original Bail Act
Bail laws were originally outlined in Bail Act 1978 which enforced strict bail regulations and favoured bail over remand. The issue with this was it let out potential offenders into the community thus risking the safety of society.
Bail Amendment 2013
introduced the ‘Unacceptable risk’ test which outlined if the accused was a risk to society
Man Moris under bail laws 2013
Under the ‘unacceptable risk’ test Man Morris was granted bail after waiting for his trial of accessory to murder of his ex-wife - during this time he committed the lint cafe seige
Man Moris under bail laws 2013- article
SMH article published in december 2013 states under “stronger bail laws this dangerous man would have been kept behind bars”
Further Amendended in 2014
Bail Amendment 2014 Act - introduced the ‘show case’ procedure which made the accused responsible for proving why they should be granted bail
What was wrong with the 2014 Bail Amendment
impeded on the presumption of innocence and the rights of the accused while compromising the interests of the community
Terrorism amendement (investigative detention) bill 2016
Futher amended the bail and remand system - giving police the power to arrest and detain someone suspected of terrosim for up to14 days without charge - impedes on presumption of innocence
Terrorism amendment positives
“giving police the ability to investigate terrorist plots” explained by NSW premier in 2016
The process of detention and interrogation - effective and ineffective
moderately effective components of the criminal investigation process- partially aiding both convictions and aquitals yet failing to entirely respect all rights of suspects
Where is detention and interrogation legislated
Law Enforcement Powers and responsibilities Act 2002 NSW
What does Law Enforcement Powers and responsibilities Act 2002 NSW in relation to detention and interrogation
NSW police force may detain a subject for up to 6 hours and may apply for another 6 - due to these regulations the community is protected and the extension maintains the presumption of innocence
Why isnt detention not entirely effective
juxtaposes the presumption of innocence as it keeps a suspect detained without having sufficient evidence against them n
Case of Mohammed Haneef
Arrested in Brisbane airport in 2007 on the basis of having a connection to the bombing of London airport - he was detained for 12 days before being charged - later the charges were dropped due to lack of evidence
Terrorism (police powers) amendment (investigative detention) Bill 2016
remain uncharged and detained for 14 days on the suspicion of terrorism
Right to silence amendment
Evidence Act 2013 (Evidence of silence) allows jurors to make adverse findings against the alleged criminal who refuses to speak during the investigation but produces evidence in trail - act infringes on the right to silence and the internationall covenant of civil and political rights
Right to silence amendment article
an SMH article 2014 articulaters according to the NSW Council for Civil Liberties “the change is unlikely to have any significant effect on the outcome of criminal trials, instead harming the defence. “
Jury legisalation contained where
Jury Act 1977 - outliens how 12 juries are to be chosen randomly from an electoral roll - meanwhile the amount of exceptions available limit the group to being smaller
Jury ineffectiveness
Jurors may not adhere to the non-bias requirements - as anticipated by the court of criminal appeals rejection of the trial of ‘Hey Dad!’ superstar after “pre-trial publicity prevented him from receiving a fair trial” (SMH 2011)
Jury and media ineffective
Higgins case - the hury in the rape case of Bruce Lehrmann has been discharged without a verdict after a juror accessed information that was not presented in the trial