Lay Magistrates- Ad & Dis Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Advantage 1

A

-Represents a cross-section of society
-Cause: firstly a bench of 3 Mags decide each case and secondly each bench is balanced so have awareness of local issues.
-Example: 2016 data from Judicial Diversity statistics
53% women Magistrates compared to 23% judges
More magistrates come from ethnic minorities (11% mag, 6% judges)
-Consequence: ensures a wide range of view in any case and fair trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Advantage 2

A
  • Cheap
  • Cause: Magistrates are volunteers
  • Example: on average a trial costs £1500 and only £500 with guilty plea, crown court trial costs £1350-2500. To replace Magistrates with judges would cost millions
  • Consequence: saves taxpayers money
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Advantage 3

A
  • Few appeals
  • Cause: suggest Magistrates have correct ideas
  • Example: Mags hear nearly 2m cases a year but only 5-6000 appeals against conviction and sentence
  • Consequence: making correct decisions despite not being legally correct.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disadvantage 1

A
  • Unrepresentative make-up
  • Cause: not particularly representative of society mostly middle aged/class
  • Example: 2016 data Judicial Diversity statistics say 80% over 50, 89% white and majority from a professional background.
  • Consequence: Magistrates may have little in common with D = unfair trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Disadvantage 2

A

-Inconsistent decisions
-Cause: magistrates in different areas sentence differently
-Example: 2010 statistics Ministry of Justice
15% Bedley, 11% Petersborough - Custodial Sentence
5.8% New Forest, 29% SE Hamp - Community Sentence
-Consequence: unfair and sentence depends on location

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Disadvantage 3

A
  • Relying on Court Clerk
  • Cause: not legally trained and have to take advice
  • Example: R v Eccles Justices ex Parte Farrelly - Mags asked legal advisor to retire with them to consider the verdict
  • Consequence: this can lead to a loss of confidence and trust in Magistrates and their decisions and in some cases to Mags decisions being challenged on appeal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly