Lay & Expert Testimony Flashcards
Lay Opinion - General Rule
If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is:
- Rationally based on the witness’ perception
- Helpful to clearly understand the witness’ testimony or to determine a fact in issue; and
- Not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge
Sample areas lay opinion okay
Usually see handwriting or voice
- Identity
- Handwriting
- Value, weight, measure, quantity
- Time, distance, velocity
- Size, age, strength
- Can estimate a car’s speed
- Heat, cold
- Sickness, health
- Disposition
- Anger, fear, calm, excitement
- Intoxication – alcohol, smell of marijuana, but not whether you think someone is under influence of a certain drug
Expert Opinion
(what makes you so smart - ex. Marisa Tomei clip)
A witness is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion of otherwise if:
(a) The expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;
(b) Testimony is based on sufficient facts or data
(c) Testimony is product of reliable principles and methods; and
(d) The expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case
When can expert testify
If what the expert says will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue
What is basis for expert opinion:
An expert may base on opinion on facts/data in case that expert has been made aware of or personally observed
o Learns by listening at trial
- Expert can sit in on trial and learn facts while listening to testimony
- Information made known to an expert
o Rely on data by experts within the field, regardless of facts mentioned at trial
o Can rely on hearsay data – statements made by other people/witnesses
- Subject to judge’s discretion
Expert Opinion - Opinion on ultimate issue
General Rule: not automatically objectionable
• An opinion is not objectionable just because it embraces an ultimate issue
- Cannot speak to whether person criminally insane at the time committed offense. Can speak to person lacking ability to know difference between right/wrong, and jury can infer that person was insane.
Expert Opinion Presentation
Ask expert to explain background, training, experience. Give opinion relevant to case. How did you form that opinion, base it on?
Scientific Evidence (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals)
2 requirements for scientific evidence
(1) Reliability: Considered reliable within the community
o 1. Can it be tested o 2. Publication, peer review o 3. Known or potential rate of error o 4. Standards governing the technique’s operation o 5. General acceptance
• Want solid foundational principles that people in industry rely on
(2) Evidence must fit the case
- Relevant
- Must bear sufficiently on the points in issue to aid the jury in its fact finding task
Modern science in the courtroom
Allow:
o Battered child syndrome
o Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome
o Rape trauma syndrome
o Battered woman syndrome
o DNA