Lawyer Liability Flashcards
R1.6 counseling client to engage in crime/fraud
rule: a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, BUT a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct w a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law
R8.3 reporting professional misconduct (2 rules one exception)
(a) a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of these Rules that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty/trustworthiness/fitness, shall inform the appropriate professional authority
(b) a lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to that judge’s honesty/trustworthiness/fitness, shall inform the appropriate professional authority
(c) exception – this rule does not require of disclosure of confidential info (R1.6) or information gained by a lawyer/judge while participating in an approved lawyers assistance program
• however, a lawyer should encourage a client to consent to disclosure of R1.6 info where prosecution would not substantially prejudice the client’s interests
R8.4 7 types of misconduct
(a) violate or attempt to violate these Rules; knowingly assist/induce another to do so; or do so through the acts of another
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty/trustworthiness/fitness
• can include private conduct that indicates a lack of characteristics relevant to law practice: violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, serious interference with admin of justice, etc.
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty/fraud/deceit/misrepresentation
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the admin of justice
• like showing up late to court or filing documents late with the court
(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a gov’t agency/official or to achieve results by means that violate these Rules/other law
(f) knowingly assist a judge/judicial officer in conduct that is violative of applicable rules of judicial conduct/other law
(g) engage in conduct that the lawyer knows/reasonably should know is harassment/discrim on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender ID, marital status, or socioeconomic status in conduct related to the practice of law
o R5.1: Responsibilities of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Lawyers
(a) duty to furnish internal policies
• lawyer managers shall make reasonable efforts to set up systems to prevent ethical problems – these include procedures to check for conflicts of interest, manage client funds, and provide CLE in legal ethics
• for small firms of experienced lawyers, informal supervision and periodic review may suffice, while more elaborate measures are needed in larger firms
• **applies to any legal service organization (not just firms)
(b) duty of supervision
• a lawyer with direct supervisory authority over another lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to ensure the other lawyer conforms to these Rules
• if a subordinate lawyer commits an ethical violation, the supervising lawyer is not responsible if the supervisor did not direct or know about it (but the violation could reveal a breach of the supervisor’s duty under R5.1(b) to make reasonable efforts to prevent violations)
(c) a lawyer shall be responsible for another lawyer’s violation of these Rules if:
• (1) the lawyer orders or, with knowledge of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved, or
o **not limited to partner/manager!
o i.e. a lawyer cannot avoid responsibility by ordering another lawyer to do the prohibited act
• (2) the lawyer is a partner/manager in the firm or has direct supervisory authority over the other lawyer, and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided/mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action
o supervisory authority is a question of fact
o appropriate remedial action depends on the immediacy of that lawyer’s involvement and the seriousness of the misconduct
o R5.2: Responsibilities of a Subordinate Lawyer
(a) a lawyer is bound by these Rules notwithstanding that the lawyer acted at the discretion of another person
• even so, that fact may be relevant in determining whether a lawyer had the knowledge required to render conduct a violation of the Rules (ex – if a subordinate filed a frivolous pleading at the direction of a supervisor, the subordinate would not be guilty of a professional violation unless the subordinate knew of the document’s frivolous character)
(b) a subordinate lawyer does not violate these Rules if that lawyer acts in accordance w a supervisory lawyer’s reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty