Lawsons Rules Flashcards

1
Q

Consent

A
  1. The π (legal and reasonably capable of consent)
  2. By words or conduct have made the ∆ reasonably understand that the
  3. π freely and knowingly consents to expose themselves to ∆ conduct, ∆ will bear no liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Negligence

A
  1. Duty
  2. Breach
  3. Causation
  4. Damages [Compensatory]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negligent conduct creates.. .

A

A

  1. Reasonably foreseeable
  2. Unreasonable risk of harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is a risk unreasonable?

A

When its magnitude and probablity outweighs the burden of avoidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trespass to chattel

A

1) Unauthorized
2) Intermeddling, w/ chattel
3) Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intent

A

1) Purpose

2) Substantially certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Transferred Intent

A

if different IT against same person, the same IT against

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Recaption

A

Privilege to use minimum force against actual wrongdoer that has taken by fraud or with constructive or actual force. Requires fresh pursuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assault

A

1) Reasonable apprehension of
2) Imminent
3) Harmful or offensive contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False Imprisonment

A

1) Intentionally cause
2) complete confinement
3) that the π is aware of
4) by the boundaries of ∆ making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defense to intention tort involving personal injuries

A

1) Express consent
a) mistake
b) fraud
c) duress
2) Implied consent
a) Emergency
b) athletic competition
c) mutual consent to combat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self Defense (3)

A
  1. Reasonable force
  2. Reasonably believes
  3. Even if reasonably mistaken
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The usual standard of care (3)

A
  1. The care expected of a reasonable person
  2. Of ordinary precedence
  3. Under the circumstance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Professional Standard of Care (3)

A
  1. To utilize the skill and judgment of a member of that
  2. Profession (specialty) in good standing
  3. In the same circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Informed consent

A

• Full disclosure of all material risks incident to treatment must be made
○ Materiality standard - risks, nature, alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common law negligence

A

If act has been found to be negligent, and ∆ commits act, then negligent as a matter of law. (E.g. railroad x-ing)

17
Q

Statutory Tort

A

Statutes explicitly provides that a person harmed by specific conduct is entitled to relief

18
Q

Negligence per se

A
  1. The unexcused
  2. violation of a statute enacted to protect
  3. a class of persons of which the plaintiff is a member
  4. from the type of harm the plaintiff suffered
  5. is negligent per se
  6. Unless the court concludes with good reason application would be inappropriate
19
Q

Res Ipsa Locquitor (2)

A

Even without specifying what the ∆ did negligently, the π may proceed if

  1. This type of accident does not ordinarily occur (>50%)in the absence of negligence, and
  2. ∆ was in exclusive control
  3. π did not in any way cause harm
20
Q

Cause in Fact (2)

A

1) But-for rule

2) Substantial-factor test (Material)

21
Q

Failure To Act

A

One does not have a duty to intervene in a situation created by someone else

22
Q

Duty to warn

A

If patient poses serious danger of violence, doctor bears duty to warn (especially if you have a narrow class of people). Also, infectious diseases, prescription medication

23
Q

Privileges (defenses to intentional torts) [8]

A
  1. Consent
  2. Self
  3. Others
  4. Property
  5. Recovery
  6. Necessity
  7. Law
  8. Discipline
24
Q

Recovery of Property (2)

A
  1. Recapture

2. Shopkeeper’s privilege

25
Public necessity (5)
1. Privileged to intentionally invade 2. Property interests of another 3. By use of reasonable force to avert 4. A reasonably apparent threat 5. To the entire (or substantial part) of the community
26
Private Necessity (5)
1. Limited privilege to intentionally invade 2. Property interests of another 3. By use of reasonable force to avert 4. A reasonably apparent threat 5. To one's own person or property
27
Exception to informed consent (1)
Risks that ought to be known by everyone or are already known
28
Burden of Proof for CIF
More likely than not
29
Common carriers and inn keepers
liable for slight negligence
30
Duty of care of property owner to invitee (3)
1) inspect property, 2) discover danger 3) protect invitee
31
Evidence for Res Ipsa Loquitor
Circumstantial
32
Concurrent tortfeasors contributing to an individual injury
When the tortious acts of two or more defendants are each a factual cause of an indivisible injury to the plaintiff, the defendants are jointly and severally liable
33
Contributory negligence is not a defense to
an intentional tort, gross negligence, or recklessness.
34
In the vast majority of modified comparative-fault jurisdictions, if the plaintiff and the defendant are found to __________, then the _________
1. be equally at fault | 2. plaintiff recovers 50% of his total damage