Law - Vocabulary and Concepts Flashcards
Advanced Sheets (court reporter)
Advanced Sheets are the cases issued in pamphlet form prior to their publication in the bound volumes.
American Law Reports (2nd’ary) A.L.R.
American Law Reports (2nd’ary) (West) = A.L.R. = provides
- editorial discussion on the topic of law
- reports leading to cases
- summaries of important cases
- cross-reference to West Key No.
- Index to Annotations: Table of Laws, Rules & Regs, and Annotation History Table
Annotations - by atty. generals
Annotations - by atty. generals
- The Atty. General gave an interpretation of part or all of the law.
- Annotations by Atty. Generals have some authority, but…
- Only Persuasive, NOT Precedent Holding.
Annotations - of a case
Annotations - of a case
Case annotations are short paragraphs on how courts have interpreted and applied the statute.
They help you understand how the case is relevant to your case.
What can a person APPEAL?
An appellant can only appeal on “questions of law”, and not questions of facts.
An appellant can only claim the trial judge made errors in application of law principles but not of facts
Everyone has the right to ONE appeal.
Appellate Court (define, and functions)
an Appellate Court hears appeals from the trial courts within its jurisdiction (i.e. within its purview). It can be called Supreme Court, or Court of Appeals, or Supreme Judicial Court. . an Appellate Court usually accepts the facts found (determined) by the trial court. It does not ordinarily consider facts or witnesses or factual events (when, what, where) because all that was done by the trial court. . an Appellate Court is to assess and decide the claim that the trial court committed legal error. Legal errors could be: - Prejudicial rulings: admitting or excluding testimony or evidence - Mistakes in law-application, in selecting and applying rules, insufficient evidence to prove the case - Violation of state or federal constitutional provisions
Appellate Court (names and structure)
The highest court in many states is called the Supreme Court, or the Court of Appeals, or the Supreme Judicial Court. In the federal court system, the highest court is the United States Supreme Court. Then there are intermediate appellate court, or the United States Court of Appeals, which is organized on a regional basis into 12 circuits + 1 Federal Circuit.
Binding Precedent
a Binding Precedent means - - a decision of a court in a prior case controls the decision in future cases with similar facts and issues - for both the deciding court and for all inferior (lower) courts within the same jurisdiction. (remember: within the same jurisdiction) a Binding Precedent is both a norm (should) and a prediction (expected).
Brief (a court brief)
A court brief is a concise outline of an actual court decision
Brief (a lawsuit brief)
embodies the points of law which attorney desires to establish, together with arguments and authorities, upon which to rest his contention
Brief (a court document)
a Brief (in the meaning of a court document) is - a formal written argument - submitted to a court - at a motion, during trial, or on appeal
Brief (of a case)
- A Brief of a case is a summary of the important elements of a published case. It contains - - facts - procedural history - issue - holding - judgement - reasoning.
- Briefing a case means dissecting and summarizing the parts of a case to understand the whole.
Briefing a case - basic steps
Briefing a case - basic steps
- Read the opinion
- Heading
- **Facts **
- **Procedural history **
- Issues
- Judgment
- Holding
- Law / legal principle applied
- Reasoning
- Concurring / Dissenting
- Add’l comments or impression? (your own)
Briefing a case - Comments/Impression
Briefing a case - Comments/Impression
This is YOUR OWN comments / impressions:
- Your reactions and critique of the opinion
- What you like or dislike
- Is the reasoning sound, contradictory, not logical?
- What is the political, economic, social impact?
- Is the decision similar to those in similar cases? (in line with other cases?)
Briefing a case - Concur/Dissent
Briefing a case - Concur/Dissent
A judge may write dissenting opinion OR a separate concurring opinion (if agreeing with the decision, but disagreeing with the logic / reasoning)
***The only thing to summarize in a concurrence or dissent is the RATIONALE of the Justice***
Briefing a case - Decision
Briefing a case - Decision
The DECISION in a Case Brief summarizes
- the rules of law
- how the rules of law applied to the facts
- what conclusion the (appellate) court reached
Use the IRAC method for the DECISION of a Case Brief
IRAC = (Response to) Issue, Rule of law, Analysis of the rationale and how it applied the law to the fact, Conclusion
Briefing a case - Statement of Facts
Briefing a case - Statement of Facts
a. Identify parties, relationship, status
b. Relevant facts to tell what happened that led to the parties suing each other (Why the controversy?)
c. Procedural facts: (1) cause of action (C/A); i.e. what law was broken, (2) relief sought by plaintiff, (3) defense raised by defendant
Briefing a case - Heading
Briefing a case - Heading
a. Case name ( to identify parties)
b. Court name
c. Date of decision
d. Page of number on case book
Briefing a case - Holding
Briefing a case - Holding
Holding is a statement of law = the court’s answer to the appealed issue.
Holding = either positive or negative of the statement of Issues
Holding = not just a Yes or No. May start with a Yes or No, but must explain Reasoning WHY
Briefing a case - Issues
Briefing a case - Issues
- The statement of issue s/b written in ONE SINGLE SENTENCE - usually a YES or NO Question*
- The question s/b phrased as a LEGAL QUESTION because it describe the legal problem the court solved.*
a. Substantive Issues - Law in dispute
- Legally relevant facts (what led to the dispute of law)
b. Procedural issues: Why the appellant claimed the lower court was wrong (ruling on evidence, jury instructions, judgment, etc.)
Briefing a case - Judgment
Briefing a case - Judgment
What is this court’s final decision?
This court’s response to the appellant? Affirm, reverse, reverse w/ instruction, remanded for clarification, etc.?
Briefing a case - Law / Legal Principle
Briefing a case - Law / Legal Principle
Rule of Law / Legal Principle =
- What the court applies to determine the substantive rights of the parties.
- Could be a Statute, a Case Rule, a Regulation, or prior cases’ holdings (common law)
- Can be expressly or implied
Briefing a case - Legal Procedure
Briefing a case - Nature of Case
Briefing a case - Procedural Basis
Briefing a case - Procedural Basis / Nature of Case / Legal Procedure
= a very short statement - ONE SENTENCE - to explain how and why the case is presented before the (appellate?) court.
(you must know the legal procedure really well to do this, but this part of the case brief is of very little importance. However, if the case has enough info to do this, you must do it in a case brief).
Briefing a case - Nature of Case
Briefing a case - Legal Procedure
Briefing a case - Procedural Basis
Briefing a case - Procedural Basis / Nature of Case / Legal Procedure
= a very short statement - ONE SENTENCE - to explain how and why the case is presented before the (appellate?) court.
(you must know the legal procedure really well to do this, but this part of the case brief is of very little importance. However, if the case has enough info to do this, you must do it in a case brief).
Briefing a case - Procedural Basis
Briefing a case - Nature of Case
Briefing a case - Legal Procedure
Briefing a case - Procedural Basis (Nature of Case, Legal Procedure)
= a very short statement - ONE SENTENCE - to explain how and why the case is presented before the (appellate?) court.
(you must know the legal procedure really well to do this, but this part of the case brief is of very little importance. However, if the case has enough info to do this, you must do it in a case brief).
Briefing a case - Procedural History (P/H)
Briefing a case - Procedural History (P/H)
a. Lower court(s)’ decisions
b. Damages awarded
c. Who appealed and why
Briefing a case - Reasoning
Briefing a case - Reasoning
Reasoning =
- the court’s analysis of issues
- the court’s application of law / legal principles to facts
- syllogistic application of rules
- (public) policy arguments to justify the holdings (why the decision was socially desirable)
Briefing a case - stmt of issue
Briefing a case - stmt of issue
- The statement of issue s/b ONE SINGLE short SENTENCE, in form of YES or NO QUESTION.
- To find the main issue, find the main principle of law applied
- There is ONLY ONE MAIN ISSUE for a case
- Sometimes, expressed issue may not be the main / most important
Briefing a case - WRONG stmt of issue
INCORRECT stmt of issue happens when the statement is confined to the facts of the case and does not articulate a legal principle.
CASE
a CASE is any judicial or administrative PROCEEDING in which FACTs of a controversy are PRESENTED in technical legal form for decision-making. The object of such proceeding is to enforce rights and remedy wrongs. In a civil case, the PLAINTIFF is the party (an individual or a group) who initiates the case, and the DEFENDANT is the party (an individual or a group) who responds. In a criminal case, the government (usually a state) initiates the case. For example: a case of breach of contract, a case of car accident, a government prosecuting a crime.
CASE (appellate court)
a CASE is the OPINION and DECISION of an appellate court deciding appeals of a judicial or administrative proceeding. a CASE has 2 functions: 1) it authoritatively decides the particular controversy’s outcome, and 2) it establishes a precedent (or possible precedent) for future controversies with similar facts and issues.
Case research - no citation
Case research - no citation
- Know the name? –> look up internet sources, LexisNexis, Westlaw
- Khow the jurisdiction? –> look up Table of Case or Digest in that jurisdiction, e.g. U.S.Supreme Court Digest, State Digest, Regional Digest
- Know the names of parties? –> look up Defendant-Plaintiff Table
- Recent case? --> Look up advance sheets or Case Alert, online sources
- Famous case name (but not known jurisdiction)? –> Look up Shepard’s cases, Cases by popular names, etc.
- Two or more cases same name? –> different stages of appeals –> need citation for each court’s opinion.
Citation - legal (books to use?)
Citation - legal authority
ALWD: Association of Legal Writing Directors
Bluebook: The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation
Maroon book: University of Chicago Manual of Legal Citation
Citation - parallel
Citation - parallel
Citations to the same case appearing in different reporters are known as “parallel citations”
We should give all the citations to a case.
To find parallel citations, use
- Shephard’s Citations
- West’s Nat’l Reporter Bluebook
- LexisNexis
- WestLaw
Citation or Cite
of a case
Citation or Cite of a case
Citation (cite) is a shorthand guide to location of the legal materials.
Citation includes: volume, page, name of reporter, year case decided,(sometimes also) court name.
Citation perches along (appears next to) the case name.
Eeach reporter has an accepted abbreviation.
Citing a Statute (State)
Citing a Statute (State)
Cal.Civ.Code §1942.5 = California Civil Code at Section 1942.5
Cal.Civ.Code §1942.5 (West 1985) = California Civil Code at Section 1942.5, published by West in 1985 (copyright date)
Cal.Civ.Code §1942.5 (West Supp. 2010) = California Civil Code at Section 1942.5, published by West in 2010 in Pocket Parts
1970 Cal. Stat.ch. 1280 §5 p. 2316 = California Session 1970, Statute, Chapter 1280, Section 5, page 2316.
Citing a Statute (U.S.)
Citing a Statute (U.S.)
42 U.S.C. §3601 = Title 42, United States Code at Section 3601 (this is the Fair Housing Act of the Civil Rights Act of 1968)
42 U.S.C.A. §3601 = Title 42, United States Code Annotated at Section 3601
42 U.S.C.S. §3601 = Title 42, United States Code Service at Section 3601
42 U.S.C.A. §3601 (West 2006) = Title 42, United States Code Annotated at Section 3601 (Westlaw 2006 edition)
82 Stat. 81 = Volume 82, of Statutes at Large, page 81 (usually for recent cases, not yet published to U.S.Code)
Pub. L. No. 90-284 = 284th Act, of 90th Congress (usually earliest appearance / as a Slip Law)
in Civil Case, you need ___________ to win?
in Civil case, we need PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE to win.
(Preponderance = superior in weight or force or numbers, i.e. very strong) [pri-PON-der-uh nt]
CIVIL Law (as opposed to Criminal Law)
CIVIL Law covers actions between PRIVATE PARTIES. Sometimes the government can be a party in a civil law suit, but mostly for non-criminal reasons.
the Civil Law system
(define)
The civil law system is used in many countries rather than the U.S., England and England’s former colonies.
The main difference between the Civil Law system and the Common Law system is that, in the Civil Law system, the judge’s decisions in cases do not become precedents and cases do not accumulate into case law.
(The Socialist Law system is similar to the Civil Law system but Marxist conceptions).
Difference between Civl and Criminal cases
If there is a possibility of JAIL or Imprisonment, the case is likely CRIMINAL. Exception: Civil contempt when a person refused to answer questions directed by a court legislature can also lead to imprisonment.
**COMMON LAW **
(2 different concepts)
- Common Law = adopted English common law
- Common Law = accumulation (collection) of court decisions
(in contrast to statutory law = the acts passed by the legislatures).
Two basic Common Law Doctrines (concise)
Res Judicata & Stare Decisis
Two basic Common Law Doctrines (detail)
Res Judicata: . a thing which has been adjudicated, a particular claim is finalized by a court (including appeals) with jurisdiction over the claim and the parties. . the court’s judgement is final; the parties cannot re-litigate. This doctrine of res judicata bars endless re-litigation; and is strictly applied by the court.
Stare Decisis: . stand by the decision, uphold the previous rulings or precedent for future cases with similar facts and issues in the same or inferior courts within a particular jurisdiction. . provide justice by CONSISTENT, COHERENT, AND PREDICTABLE treatment of like cases