law reform unit 4 aos2B Flashcards
what are four reasons for law reform
1- community values
2- changing nature of technology
3- protection of community
4- changing exprectations of legal system
what are changing community values
def and examples
def:
changing community values refers to a shift in what the community deems as the ‘norm’ when it comes to belief morals and ethics. These values and beliefs to be a just and fair society should be
examples:
- legal abortion
- same sex marriage
- euthanasia
what is changing nature of technology:
def and examples
def:
changing nature of technology refers to efficient and fast development in technology for commercial purposes, often lead to the law failing to catch up. when this occurs, peoples safety can be put at risk as technology can be used to cause harm.
examples:
- the use of social media among young people
- the use of drones and privacy
- face recognition
what is changing community protection
def
examples
def:
- as society becomes better educated and more informed about the issues and the world around them, individuals are more likely to question the law and require that the law be amended to reflect the current state of play
examples:
- human rights advocacy
- use and treatment of animals for scientific and commercial purposes
what is changing expectations of the legal system
def
examples
def:
- the way people view the role of the law has overtime. in the past the law was seen as a way to regulate behaviour and identify norms. today society expects the law uphold rights, protect them from harm and bring about justice
examples:
- wearing masks
- regulations to protect privacy
what are the methods to influence law reform
x4
what is law reform?
def- means actions taken by individuals or organisations to influence law reform
1- petitions
2- demonstrations
3- use of courts
4- pressure and interests of groups
methods to influence law reform:
1- petitions
what are they and one example
def- formal requests for plmt to introduce or change a law based upon signatures from individuals
examples:
- change.org campaign for making voting centres wheelchair accessible
4 x strengths of petitions
1- easy way of showing support
2- e petitions are quick and easy for ppl to sign
3- mps obligated to sign petitions
4- cheap and easy to organise
4 x weaknesses of petitions
1- mps of plmt must be presented however do not act upon it
2- e petitions could be signed by bots
3- petitions can be ignored easily
4- peititons can take time to gather
methods influence law reform :
2- demonstrations
what are they and one example
def- gathering of a large group in a public place to express disapproval toward a particular law
example:
- school strike for climate change
4 x strengths of demonstrations
1- increase awareness
2- holds govt to account more likely to react
3- gain media attention
4- phyucal demonstrations affect more
4 x weaknesses of demonstrations
1- ppl can get hurt by certain actions
2- cause disruptions
3- leads to misuse of police recources
4- cause anger for communities as daily lives affected
methods influencing law reform
3- courts used
how do ppl do this
rstablishing a precedent through a test case
seeking clarification on phrases in acts
3x strengths of courts used
1- superior courts can set a binding precedent
2- even if case unsucessful= gain attention of community
3- accessible for ppl wanting reform
3x weaknesses of courts used
1- costs and time to bring a case to court
2- individuals must have “standing”
3- plmt can abrogate decision
media and law reform:
traditional media
what is it
4 x featurees
def- mediums often non digital eg newspapers or radios
features:
- high number of audiences
- more trustworthy
- info is more controlled
- limited audience interaction
traditional media
2 x benefits
1- influence law reform through its ability to examine discuss and inform people of legal issues. newspapers and radios = major source + accessed by millions > shape views and attitudes of audience
2- television programs investigate problems in community to inform injustices. this can assist govt to decide if there is sufficient support for change in law