Law reform Flashcards

1
Q

Changes in community beliefs, values and attitudes

A

Beliefs and values of society and communities shift over time. This can result from people becoming more educated about certain issues or, the increased ability seek out information so that they can be informed. As a result, the law has had to change to reflect the views and values of the society in which it serves to maintain relevance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Changes in technology

A

Technology can evolve and change rapidly increasing the potential for people to be exploited and harmed through its misuse. As a result of increased cyberbullying, scams and other harmful acts with technology, parliament needs to ensure that law reforms regulate the progression of technology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Need for community protection

A

As society grows and becomes more complex, there may be increased instances whereby the community is facing harm. This harm can include physical harm, emotional harm and economic harm. Due to this, law needs to be updated in order to constantly protect the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the methods of petitions + requirements to be presented in parliament

A

Petitions = a document consisting of a collection of signatures from individuals demanding an action or legislative reform that is given to parliament.

  • The petition addresses that House in which its being presented.
  • States the action being requested for legislative change + reason.
  • Contains the details of the person who initiates/organizes the petition.
  • Has at least 1 signature.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe one example of a petition

A

A 2022 petition to place pressure on the commonwealth, state and territory govt. to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14 years. 211 000 signatures by July 2022.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe three strengths of a petition

A
  • Petitions are a convenient and free method of collating support for action, particularly e-petitions.
  • The relevant minister is required to respond to all e-petitions in the petition report, which is tabled every few weeks in parliament.
  • A petition with a hundred of thousands of signatures will be seen to be more representative of the community and therefor fain the attention of parliament due to the nature of representative govt.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe three weaknesses of a petition

A
  • It is ultimately up to the relevant minister to determine if the demands of a petition will be actioned or not.
  • Petitions generally need to be about legislative issues that are on the current agenda for parliament to pay sufficient attention to the petitions demands.
  • Opposing petitions and multiple petitions on the same topic may reduce or dilute the impact of the issue.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the method of a demonstration

A

A large gathering of individuals/groups to protest a law or call for parliament to undertake legislative reform, usually conducted in a public space e.g. steps of parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe one example of a demonstration

A

Australian schools strike for climate 2019 - 350 000 students gathered protesting for the govt. to alter its climate change policy to include a 100% reduction in emissions by 2030.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe three strengths of a demonstration

A
  • Demonstrations have the ability to cause disruption and can be an effective tool for people to have their demands met swiftly, as exemplified by workers’ strikes.
  • Given the representative nature of parliament, parliamentarians should theoretically pay close attention to demonstrations, as a number of their constituents are clearly communicating their desire for change.
  • Demonstrations can alert and educate members of society about social, economic, political and legal injustice and the need for law change and, eventually bring change over time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe three weaknesses of a demonstration

A
  • If a successful demonstration is not immediately followed up by further action, momentum for a cause will often fade.
  • The disruptions caused by demonstrations can often result in negative media attention, particularly if the issue is considered ‘extreme’ by the media and is against politician’s interests.
  • Demonstrations are difficult to organise and are time-consuming, as they require a large mass of people to be in the same place, at the same time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe how courts can be used to influence law reform

A

-Standing - a party must be able to demonstrate that they are sufficiently impacted by the law + issues of the case to have ‘standing’ to bring a case forward.
-Parties must have resources such as time and money to access the courts.
-The court hearing the matter must be able to est. a precedent and therefor must be a superior court or, parties can consider appealing if they have leave.
-The outcome resulting from a case either be codified by parliament or abrogated which can impact whether the precedent remains.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline three strengths of using courts

A
  • Even if a matter is unsuccessful in court, attention may be garnered that can prompt legislative change.
  • Should a challenge in court be successful, a court ruling could result in legislation being declared ultra vires or void.
  • Judges are politically independent and determine the case based on facts and merits of the case rather than for political gain. pressure.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline three limitations of using courts

A
  • Individuals or groups pursuing litigation must hold sufficient standing, whilst also establishing enough evidence to not only bring the case to court but also to have an outcome that is in their favour.
  • Except for the high court disputed involving interpretation of the constitution, a judge-made law can be abrogated by parliament.
  • Judges are unelected, and their decisions and comments may not necessarily represent the community.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Masson V Parsons

A

-male donated sperm to friend + believed he would be involved in the childs life.
- Ms Parsons attempted to relocate with child and partner to New Zealand when Mr Masson took matter to court in order to have child remain in Australia.
-case went all the way to the High Court where the term ‘parent’ was interpreted and he was given parental rights.
-precedent = sperm donor who has been actively involved in the childs life is considered a parent and has parental rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe traditional media

A

This type of media began during the 19th century in the forms of newspapers + radio broadcast. Traditional media is less interactive and tends to deliver information to users through a linear - sender - message - receiver model. E.g. print newspapers, print magazines, broadcast radio, television.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe social media/new media

A

This type of media began during the 20th and 21st century through digital technology. It includes social media platforms, podcasts, livestreams, virtual reality etc. New media is based around user interaction whereby users don’t just receive the information, they can interact with content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline three roles the media has in influencing law reform

A
  1. Informing and raising awareness - by providing people with information, the media allows audiences to be aware and to know about issues in society, politics, legal changes, international matters.
  2. Assessing levels of community support - the media can assist parliament, govt. , NGOs gauge the level of public support/interest towards a particular issue to influence legislative change.
  3. Influencing community opinion on a change in the law - the media can provide audiences with different perspectives, opinions and facts which can lead them to change their stance on issue and support/limit support from influencing legislative change.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Outline three strengths of the media in influencing law reform

A
  • Traditional media such as newspapers, television documentaries and radio operates under professional journalistic codes. Therefore, stories and news provided by these mediums will have undergone fact-checking to ensure that materials are accurate.
  • Social media, due to its interactive element can allow individuals and special interest groups direct access to MPs and political parties to raise the need for law reform.
  • The govt. is fearful of negative representation in the media, in particular mediums in traditional media that are considered more ‘reputable’ and therefore will feel more pressure to reform the law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Outline three limitations of the media in influencing law reform

A
  • Traditional media such as newspapers, television stations and radio stations are heavily concentrated in their ownership. This means that they are owned by very individuals, for example 82% of Australia’s print media is owned by two companies. This can influence the way information is portrayed to the audience as there can be a high degree of bias due to limited perspective of the owners.
  • Social media does not require its users to uphold professional code of conduct when sharing information. As a result ‘news’ shared is not fact-checked resulting in fake news.
  • The use of algorithms can influence what people are reading. By predicting what users are likely to stop and read, social media can target them with news stories that only provides a narrow perspective on the issue and limit the number of opinions they are exposed to.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Explain what VLRC is

A

Is a statutory and formal law reform body. This means it was established through the passing of legislation (Victorian Law Reform Commission Act 2000 (Vic)) with the purpose of recommending law reform to Victorian parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Outline two of VLRC’s purposes

A
  • Members of parliament often lack the time, resources and at time, expertise to undertake thorough investigation of an issue. As a result, parliament may delegate this function to formal law reform bodies to conduct its own investigations and make recommendations for changes in the law.
  • When making recommendations to parliament, VLRC should aim to provide parliament with impartial and independent advice and recommendation for change.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Describe two roles of the VLRC

A
  • Receive and analyse the Victorian Attorney-General’s terms of reference - terms of reference contains information about the scope of the inquiry, the particular policy or issue being investigated, the final report due date.
  • Investigate minor community legal issues - The VLRC has the power to investigate and provide recommendations to the Victorian Attorney - General about minor issues within broader society without a terms of reference. It may conduct such research and investigations as long as it does not require a significant amount of resources.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Four steps outlining the process undertaken by VLRC to conduct law reform

A
  1. project is initiated - the VLRC will receive a terms of reference form the Vic Attorney-General outlining the scope of the project or the VLRC will begin its own community law reform project.
  2. Consultations and submissions - A consultations paper providing contextual information and investigatory questions is published, alongside a call for community submissions. Extensive consultations are held with experts, affected parties and those who have a special interest in the matter. Additionally, submissions from the community are received and reviewed.
  3. Govt. response and changes to the law - The Vic govt. has the option to implement the recommendations and make amendments to the law. However, it is not obliged to do so and there is no timeline in which action must be taken.
  4. Report - The commission prepares a report, including the suggested recommendations for law reform, and presents it to the Vic Attorney-General.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Outline four strengths of VLRC in influencing law reform

A
  • As the terms of reference are received from the Victorian Attorney-General, who is a member of parliament and is an official advisor to the govt. the subsequent recommendations are more likely to be considered and adopted by parliament.
  • VLRC can independently initiate projects and investigate matters concerning minor community legal issues without a terms of reference from the Victorian Attorney-General. This enables it to provide recommendations for law reform in areas that are specific to the needs of certain groups and communities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Outline four limitations of the VLRC in influencing law reform

A
  • The govt. is not obliges to consider or implement any of the recommendations provided by the VLRC.
  • Projects can be costly. Given the amount of resources available and funding provided, cost factors may limit the scope of VLRC investigations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Reasons VLRC began this enquiry

A

Based upon the 13th person rule, this prohibits any support person being present thereby indirectly excluding jurors with communication disabilities from serving. Ppl with disabilities make up approximately 10% of the overall population, and by excluding those with communication difficulties, juries cannot truly uphold the representative nature of society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Process - when did it begin, name two groups that they spoke to, how many submissions

A
  • March 2020
  • Juries Victoria + blind citizens of Australia
  • 14 Submissions from stakeholders + held 29 consultations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Recommendations - how many, outline 2 recommendations

A
  • 53 recommendations
  • Making relevant, physical adjustments available in the jury process, such as Auslan interpreters, support persons, hearing loops and braille material.
  • Disability awareness training required for judges, lawyers and court staff who work with juries.
30
Q

Outline the impact of law reform

A

Final report tabled in May 2023 and no action so far.

31
Q

Definition for royal commissions

A

The most formal inquiry process into an issue of public concern. Crown’s representation (Governor-General) must issue a letter patent allowing the commission to proceed. Statutory authority - Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) and Inquiries Act 2014 (Vic).

32
Q

Outline four features of royal commissions

A
  • They can occur on Commonwealth or State levels.
  • They are established through the executive branch of govt. - therefore it is the govt. that generally initiates royal commissions.
  • They have investigatory powers (to summon or compel ppl to attend hearings, give evidence under oath and be subject to cross examinations)
33
Q

Examples of when royal commissions may be initiated

A

Something bad has occurred e.g. abuse in youth detention

34
Q

Outline four strengths of royal commissions

A
  • Able to comprehensively investigate a particular incident, area of policy, or social, legal or political issue in their research. Therefore, they can provide insightful recommendations for law reform that accurately and adequately addresses the issue at hand.
  • Independent of the govt. meaning their investigations are not influenced by political biases.
  • Hearings are often public, and submissions can be made by the community, providing an indirect way for the public to influence law reform and put their concerns before parliament.
35
Q

Outline four limitations of royal commissions

A
  • As they are the highest form of inquiry, they are only established in rare and exceptional circumstances.
  • Can be very expensive because of the resources required, such as staff and the use of experts. For example, robodebt commissions given a budget of $30 million.
  • The govt. is not obliged to follow the suggested recommendations, meaning the inquiry could be considered a waste of time and money.
36
Q

Reasons for Disability Royal Commission

A

Established in April 2019 in response to community concerns about widespread reports of violence agains, and the neglect, abuse and exploitation of people with disability.

37
Q

When did disability commission occur

A

April 2019

38
Q

How long did disability commission take

A

2019 - September 2023

39
Q

How much did disability commission cost

A

$527.9 million

40
Q

Who did disability commissions speak and consult with

A

7,944 submissions received
17,824 phone enquiries
1,785 private sessions held.

experiences in conditions such as schools, workplaces, jails + detention centres, secure disability and mental health facilities, group homes or boarding houses, family homes, hospitals.

41
Q

What were the disability commissions recommendations

A

222 recommendations
- Introduction of an Australian Disability Rights Act to strengthen protection of the rights of ppl with disability and meet Australia’s obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

42
Q

What has been impact of disability commission

A

Prior to the publication of the final report, parliamnet had begun work on steadily amending legislative changes to the disability space. This included passing the Disability and Inclusion Act 2023 (Cth) to embed more explicit human-rights based regulations towards the treatment of people with disability and are progressively considering the 222 other recommendations.

43
Q

Reasons for constitutional reform

To change Australia’s political structure

A

There have been referendums held and proposed to change the political structures that currently exist in Australia.
- 1999 referendum on making Australia a republic

44
Q

Reasons for constitutional reform

To protect express/individual rights

A

Australia has 5 express rights. There have been calls to add additional rights to the constitution or, for Australia to adopt a bill of rights.
- 1988 referendum held to extend express right freedom of religion to ‘Australians [could] follow their own religious beliefs subject to the laws which govern us all’. This failed as many believed it was aimed at abolishing religion.

45
Q

Reasons for constitutional reform

To recognise the rights of First Nations people

A

When the constitution was first drafted it was deemed acceptable not to recognise Australia’s First Nations people. There have been three referendums with regards to the rights of FNP
- 1999 an additional proposal to the Republic referendum for FNP to be included in the constitutions preamble.

46
Q

Reasons for constitutional reform

To change Commonwealth law making powers

A

To permanently amend the division of powers, the constitution would have to be changed.
- 1911 Govt. proposed to extend its powers through giving it sole power over trade and commerce, control over corporations, wages and conditions of labour. The referendum failed with an overall 60% no vote.

47
Q

Outline the referendum process

A
  1. A bill with the proposed change to the constitution is introduced
  2. The bill is passed (by absolute majority) by both houses of parliament
  3. Information is given to voters explaining the proposed change
  4. All eligible voters cote other ‘yes’ or ‘no’ in the referendum
  5. A double majority is achieved
  6. Royal assent is given
  7. The constitution is changed
48
Q

Definitions of Approval of Commonwealth Houses

A
  • A member of parliament introducing a constitution alteration bill to either houses
  • The bill must normally be passed by an absolute majority of votes in both houses
  • If an absolute majority is achieved in the Senate within 2-6 months of the bill passing through LH, the proposal must be submitted to voters
49
Q
A
50
Q

Definition of double majority requirement

A
  • The majority of voters in Australia’s population voting ‘yes’
  • A majority of voters in a majority of states voting yes for the change. Minimum of voters across 4 states must vote ‘yes’ in favour of the change.
51
Q

Three strengths of referendum process

A
  • Section 128 of the constitution gives voters in Australia the power to reject changes to the constitution after such changes have been approved by the Cth parliament. This empowers voters to approve or reject changes to the constitution that politicians proposed.
52
Q

Three weaknesses of referendum process

A
  • Referendums can be extremely expensive. For example, the 1999 referendum cost $66,820,894 according to the Australian Electoral Commission. This discourages prime ministers from wanting to hold a referendum and change the constitution due to its expense.
53
Q

Three factors that may impact the success of a referendum

A
  • Bipartisan support
  • How informed/educated voters are about the proposal
  • The nature of the proposal
  • The willingness of voters to seek change
54
Q

Details of the 1999 referendum

A
  • 45.13% of electors voting ‘yes’ to becoming a republic. Two questions in one - confusing nature of the proposal.
55
Q

Describe momentum in the lead up to the referendum

A
  • 1965 freedom ride - 15 day bus ride of uni students involved a bus stopping in several NSW towns to draw attention to issues of segregation + living conditions of FNP
  • 1966 wave hill walk-off - 200 Gurinjdi employees + families went on strike regarding increasing wages + fairer land rights
56
Q

Identify the proposal that was posed to the ppl to vote on and its impacts

A

Removal of part of S51 (xxvi) that suggested Cth could make laws with respect to ppl of any other race ‘other than the Aboriginal in any state’. Completely removing S127 (incl. in census)

57
Q

Outline the results of the referendum inc. double majority requirement

A

WA - 80.9%
SA - 86.3%
Tas - 90.2%
Vic - 94.7%
NSW - 91.5%
QLD - 89.2%

58
Q

Outline three significance of the referendum

A
  • Power to legislate on FNP issues became a concurrent power.
  • Since Cth could now legislate on FNP it increased ability to promote equality such as social welfare.
  • Allowed Cth to override discriminatory policies such as those in QLD in 1975 that treated FNP differently from others e.g. determining where they lived and worked.
59
Q

Describe momentum on issue in the lead up to the 2023 referendum

A
  • Between 23 - 26 May 2017, a National Constitutional Convention was held at Uluru to discuss what recognition of FNP within our constitution should look like. On the final day of the convention, the Uluru Statement from the Heart was declared. This document contained broad objectives for an entrenched Indigenous ‘voice’ within out constitution.
60
Q

Who initiated 2023 referendum

A

Anthony Albanese

61
Q

Which political party supported 2023 referendum

A

Labor party, Greens and Jacqui Lambie network.

62
Q

When did the 2023 referendum bill pass parliament

A

June 2023

63
Q

What were the questions on the 2023 referendum

A

‘A proposed law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve of this alteration’

64
Q

Reasons for ‘yes’ vote in 2023 referendum

A

Gave rights and increased ability for FNP to influence their own laws.

65
Q

Reasons for ‘no’ vote in 2023 referendum

A

Legal risks and potential challenges due to the unknown nature of the voice.

66
Q

Results of 2023 referendum

A

‘yes’ vote = 39.9%
Victoria = highest yes vote with 45.85% followed by Tasmania + NSW on 41%

67
Q

Significance of 2023 referendum

A
  • Lack of bipartisan support. Votes were closely tied to the position of the two main political parties and, of the 8 successful referendums that have passed, all had bipartisan support.
  • Some ppl may have voted no because they did not believe the change went far enough to recognise the FNP.
68
Q

Ways in which Australian ppl can contribute to further change

A
  • people driven change
69
Q

Ways in which Australian ppl may be limited in contributing to future change

A
  • Understanding of political reform
70
Q

Future constitutional reforms - republic referendum - 3 arguments for and 3 against

A

For
- Australia should have an Australian as head of state, not a British king or queen
- An independent country deserves to elect its own head of state
Against
- Australians should maintain the status quo
- Changing Australia to become a republic would require 69 changes to the constitution.