Law of Torts Flashcards

1
Q

What is tort

A

A tort is a civil wrong where obligations are imposed by law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What may a party who commits tort be liable to pay

A

If a party commits a tort, they may be liable to pay damages to the injured party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are examples of tort

A

Examples of tort are:
- Negligence
- Nuisance
- Tort of Deceit
- Defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is negligence

A

Failure to exercise reasonable care, leading to harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is nuisance

A

Unlawful interference with a person’s enjoyment of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who does public nuisance affect

A

Public Nuisance: Affects the general public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who does private nuisance affect

A

Private Nuisance: Affects an individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is tort of deceit

A

Tort of Deceit – Fraudulent misrepresentation causing financial loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is defamation

A

Defamation – Damaging a person’s reputation through false statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is libel

A

Libel: Defamation in permanent form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is slander

A

Slander: Defamation in spoken or temporary form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are time limit for claims under the Limitations Act 1980

A

Under the Limitation Act 1980, claims for negligence must be made within three years from the date of damage or knowledge of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When does negligence occur

A

Negligence occurs when a person fails to take reasonable care, resulting in harm to another party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What elements must be proven to establish negligence

A

To establish negligence, three elements must be proven:
- Duty of Care
- Breach of Duty
- Causation & Damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What do courts apply if no precedent for duty of care has been established

A

If no precedent exists, courts apply the Caparo v Dickman (1990) 3-Stage Test:
- Reasonable Foreseeability
- Proximity
- Fair, Just & Reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) establish

A

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) established the modern principle of duty of care

17
Q

What did Lord Atkin introduce

A

Lord Atkin introduced the “neighbour principle”

18
Q

What is the neighbour principle

A

neighbour principle means individuals must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that could harm others who are closely affected by their actions

19
Q

When does a breach of duty occur

A

A breach of duty occurs when a defendant fails to meet the required standard of care expected in a given situation

20
Q

What objective test is the standard of care based on

A

The standard of care is based on an objective test:
- What a reasonable person would do in similar circumstances
- If the defendant has special skills, they are held to the standard of a reasonably competent person in that profession

21
Q

What do courts assess when determining if a duty was breached

A

When determining if a duty was breached, courts assess the following risk factors:
- Probability of Harm
- Seriousness of Harm
- Precautions Taken
- If the defendant’s actions had significant social benefit, this may justify a lower standard of care

22
Q

What legal principles can a claimant rely on to prove a breach of duty

A

They can rely on two key legal principles:
- Section 11 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968
- Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur (“The Thing Speaks for Itself”)

23
Q

What does Section 11 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968 state

A

Section 11 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968 states a criminal conviction can be used as evidence in a civil claim

24
Q

When is the Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur used

A

Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur is used when direct evidence of negligence is unavailable

25
What does the Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur mean
The Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur means the claimant only needs to show that the accident would not have happened without negligence
26
What is pure economic loss
Pure economic loss is financial loss not linked to physical injury or property damage
27
When is pure economic loss recoverable in negligence
Pure economic loss is not usually recoverable in negligence unless there is: - A contractual relationship between the parties - A special relationship where a duty of care is owed
28
What happened in Ross v Caunters (1980)
Ross v Caunters (1980) – Solicitors owe a duty of care to intended beneficiaries under a will
29
What happened in Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964)
Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964) – A duty of care exists for negligent misstatements where there is a special relationship
30
31
32
What are the different general defences in tort
General Defences in Tort: - Contributory Negligence (Partial Defence) - Consent (Volenti Non Fit Injuria) – Complete Defence - Illegality – Complete Defence
32
What does partial defence reduce
Reduces (but does not eliminate) the damages awarded to the claimant
33
What is contributory negligence governed by
Governed by the Law Reform Act 1945
34
Can a claimant recover damages if they were engaging in illegal activities
A claimant cannot recover damages if they were injured while engaging in illegal activity
35
What can consumers can sue for harm caused by defective products under:
Consumers can sue for harm caused by defective products under: - Contract law - Tort law - Consumer Protection Act 1987
36
What does the Rylands v Fletcher Rule mean defendants might argue
Rylands v Fletcher Rule – Defendants may argue they had no control over the hazardous escape or that it was caused by an unforeseeable event
37
What is the private nuisance defence
The private nuisance defence is a defendant may argue the claimant was being overly sensitive or that the nuisance was reasonable
38
What is the trespass to land defence
Trespass to Land – A defendant may argue they had lawful authority to enter