LAW OF THE SEA 3 Flashcards
Which ones are the main straits and chanells?
- Bosporus Strait
- Strait of Gibraltar
- Bering Strait
- Strait of Magellan
- Strait of Hormuz
- Strait of Messina
- Bab-el Mendeb Strait
- Strait of Malacc.
- Suez Canal
- Panama Canal
Which is the definition of “Strait”
A ‘strait’ is a narrow stretch of sea connecting two extensive areas of sea (or a narrow passage connecting two sections of the high seas). Regulated under UNCLOS III.
What is the biggest legal problem that appears with the creation of straits as a subject?
Disappearance of high seas corridors when the breadth of the Territorial Sea expanded from 3/6 to 12 miles making most of the international Straits become part of the Territorial Sea of Straits states. Disappearance of high seas corridors.
Doctrine clash when classifying straits as subjects and its solution?
Straits States wanted to stick to the regime of innocent passage vs Maritime States, which claimed for freedom of navigation.
SOLUTION: Regime of ‘transit passage’ result of negotiations and compromise
Why is the The Corfu Channel Case important?
It illustrates strait law before UNCLOS III Three separate events involving Royal Navy ships in the Channel of Corfu which took place in 1946:
- Royal Navy ships came under fire from Albanian fortifications.
- Royal Navy ships striking mines.
- Royal Navy conducted mineclearing operations in the Corfu Channel, but in Albanian territorial waters, and Albania complained about them to the United Nations.
Albania was to pay £844,000 to the United Kingdom. “in the opinion of the Court, States in time of peace have a right to send their war ships through straits used for international navigation between the two parts of the high seas without the previous authorization of a coastal State, provided that the passage is innocent.
UNCLOS I and the Geneva Convention strait regulation
Article 16 (4) of Geneva convention made passages between high seas and territorial waters to be also considered as straits.
Competition for UNCLOS III
The maritime powers wishing to freely navigate through straits vs Straits States who were concerned to protect its security and other interests in their territorial waters.
Interest of maritime states on UNCLOS III negotiations
- Maintaining high seas status in corridors in between 116 straits by limiting aquisition of waters (avoid coastal states getting 12 miles) so freedom of navigation in high seas (art 87) prevailed.
Interest of coastal states on UNCLOS III negotiations
-Taking out the free navigation passages in between the striaits by claiming the 12 miles of territorial waters.
-Exceptions: Indonesia and Malaysia agreed that the Straits of Malacca and Singapore are not international straits, while fully recognizing their use for international shipping in accordance with the principle of innocent passage. Singapure followed.
What is the compromise formula for regulation of straits under UNCLOS III?
The ‘transit passage” regime: Acceptance of this regime made it possible for the Conference to reach agreement on 12 nautical miles as a maximum breadth of the territorial sea.
Which ones are the 4 regulatory categories for straits as adopted in part 3 of UNCLOS III?
Part III of the Convention (Articles 34 to 45) deals with
“Straits Used for International Navigation:
– 1. Straits governed by long-standing special conventions;
– 2. Straits with central corridors of high seas or EEZ;
– 3. Straits subject to the regime of innocent passage;
– 4. Straits subject to the regime of transit passage
Regulation of Straits governed by long-standing special conventions
Article 35 (c): The straits regime laid down in Part III of the
Convention does not affect “the legal regime in straits in which
passage is regulated in whole or in part by long-standing international conventions in force specifically relating to such
straits.”
Ex: Bosphorus and Dardanelles by Montreux Convention (1936)
It gives the Republic of Turkey control over warships entering the straits but guarantees the free passage of civilian vessels in peacetime.
Regulation of Straits with central corridors of high seas or EEZ
Article 36: Part III does not apply to straits through which there is a high seas route, or a route through an EEZ, of similar convenience with respect to its navigational and hydrographical characteristics.
Florida Strait between USA and Cuba would be
an example.
This situation will normally be possible in a strait wider than 24 miles. regime of innocent passage will apply to those parts of the strait which lie within the territorial sea limits and the regime of freedom of navigation.
Regulation of Straits subject to the regime of innocent passage
Article 45(1) (b), the regime of innocent passage applies in straits connecting a part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone and the territorial sea of a foreign State. And there shall be no suspension of innocent passage through them (Article 45 (2)
Ex: Straits of Tiran between Egypt Sinai and Saudi Arabia
Exception of Messina on Regulation of Straits subject to the regime of innocent passage.
First, under Article 38 (1), a strait formed by an island of a State bordering the strait and its mainland, where there exists seaward of the island a route of similar convenience through high seas or EEZ, is entirely excluded from the ‘transit passage’ regime.
Regulation of Straits subject to the regime of transit passage
Article 37: The regime of transit passage applies to straits which are used for international navigation between one part of the high seas or an EEZ and another part of the high seas or an EEZ.
But 2 conditions:
- The geographical condition is that the strait connects one part of the high seas or an EEZ and another part of the high seas or an EEZ.
- The functional condition is that the strait is ‘used for international navigation’.
Ex: Straits of Malacca and Singapore
These two criteria are taken (and adapted) from the
judgment of the ICJ in the Corfu Channel case.