Law of negligence Flashcards
Negligence
A failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances
The law of negligence
Negligence consists of a breach of duty wherein the breach proximally cayses an injury to a party whom the duty is owed. ({ failure of what we didnt do causes harm to someone.)
Four main elements of negligence are
Existence of duty of care
Breach of the duty
Injury resulting from the breach
Proximate cause of the injury by the breach
Duty of CAre
Everyone has a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury to those to whom the duty is owed.
The definitions and degrees of the duties and the consequences of breaching them, constitute the laws of negligence, also known as the law of torts.
Two kinds of torts
Intentional and unintentional
Reasonable PErson
Uses careful and thoughtful behavior has at least some common sense, and is entitled to expect reasonable conduct from others.
avoids endangering others, shies away from follishness, and is entitled.
Not used when judging mentally ill or children.
The purposes of Tort Law
Regulation Deterrence Compensation Dispute resolution Education Prevention
Intentional Tort
Assault, battery, trespass, conversion, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of mental suffering, deceit, intentional interference with contact.
Defences to the intentional torts
Consent, Self-defence, Defence of property, defence of a third person, necessity, legal authority, lack of intention
Unintentional Torts
Unintentional negligence is found when the tortfeasor is presumed not to have intended the resulting injury. The any accident, negligence can occur in the twinkling of an eye and be perpetrated by the most well intentioned people.
Foreseeability and proximate cause
The general rule is that a person is liable for negligence only if the consequences of the act were reasonably forseeable
To succeed in a lawsuit for negligence, a plaintiff must prove on a balance of probabilities that the defendants act, or failure to act, was the proximate cause of the injury.
Voluntary assumption of risk
A person who participates in an activity knowing that injury could result is said to have voluntarily assumed a risk.
For this to occur the following has has sto take place:
The plaintiff :
Knew about the risk
Understood the risk
Had a choice to avoid the risk
Voluntarily assumed the risk
The defendant was not in breach of a statutory duty from which the injuries flowed.
Waivers and disclaimers
Contracts in which one party agrees that he understands the risks, agrees to proceed notwithstanding the risks, and usually agrees not to hold the other party liable in the event of injury.
Vicarious Liability
Employers are responsible for the action of their staff while on the job.
Negligent Misrepresentation
A person may be liable for making negligent statements
Liability may follow if a person negligently gives advice or information knowing the recipient intends to rely on it, and the recipient does rely on it to their detriment