Law Making Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Bicameral

A

2 Chamber legislature. Houses at the Palace of Westminster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legislature

A

To make a law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

House of Lords (Upper House)

A

760 Members
Mixture of party members appointed for life
Can delay bills but not prevent them
Each law needs Royal Ascent (the Queen’s Approval)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

House of Commons (Lower House)

A

650 elected members
Elections held every 5 years
Members represent parties and PM
Source of all primary legislation and Acts of Parliament
Can override the HOL
Sovereign Power- no higher authority than parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Influences on Parliament

A

Political Influence
Public Opinion
Pressure Groups
Lobbyists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Political Influence

A

Elections
Political parties publishing manifestos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Public Opinion

A

Governments will make changes to law if there is string public opinion about it eg: Abortion Act 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pressure Group

A

A group that campaigns for a specific cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lobbyists

A

An individual who will try to convince politicians to support a specific cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pros of Political Influences

A

Each party has proposals for reform
Know what they wish to do if they are elected as government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cons of Political Influences

A

If a different party is elected they may alter laws which can be costly and open to criticisms eg: Coalition Government of 2010-2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pros of Public Opinion

A

The Uk has a free press meaning the press are able to criticise policy and bring any other issues to the attention of the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cons of Public Opinion

A

Government may respond too quickly to high profile incidences resulting a law to be made without a proper thought process eg: Dangerous Dogs Act was a ‘knee jerk’ reaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pros of Pressure Groups

A

Groups that have large memberships such as National Trust can raise an issue of concern to a large number of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cons of Pressure Groups

A

Can be occasions where 2 pressure groups have conflicting interests and want opposing things eg: fox hunt ban

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pros of Lobbyists

A

Brings issues to the attention of the MPs. This may lead to a debate in parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cons of Lobbyists

A

Professional lobbyists can lead to the abuse of the process. Eg when MPs are paid to ask questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Green Paper

A

When a law is propose the department will issue a Green paper. This is a document outlining the governments proposals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

White Paper

A

Once all these comments have been considered the department may then issue a white paper. This sets out the governments firm proposals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Different types of bills

A

Acts of Parliament/Statutes
Private Members’ Bills
Private Bills
Hybrid Bills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How does a bill become a law

A

First Reading
Second Reading- allows MPs to debate and comment on the bill
Committee Stage- specialist examine the bill
Report Stage- Minister will report back to the house with amendments
Third Reading- last opportunity for debate
Royal Ascent- Bill is approved by the Queen as is published as a law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pros of the legislative process

A

Democratic
Full Reform- acts of parliament can reform whole areas of law at once
Broad Policy
Consultation- allows government to take into consideration subjections and objections to the proposal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Cons of the legislative process

A

Lack of time
Long Process
Complexity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Delegated Legislation

A

Law made by another person or body other than parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Types of Delegated Legislation

A

Order in council- Queen and the Privy Council
Statutory Instrument- Rules and regulations made by ministers in their department
By Laws- laws made by local authorities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Order In Council

A

Privy Council being the Queen the PM and leading government members. They cover:
Bringing acts of parliament into force
Making Law in times on national emergency
Can update existing laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Statutory Instruments

A

Has an enabling act which gives ministers authority to issue declarations eg: Building Regulations (2010) and Police Codes of Practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

How is delegated legislation controlled?

A

Control by parliament
Control by courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Control by courts

A

Ultra Vires is when court deems that DL has 1. Gone beyond the power given by the enabling act 2. The incorrect procedure was used 3. A decision has been made unreasonably eg:

R v. Home Secretary
R v. Swindon NHS Trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Reasons for Delegated Legislation

A

Detailed Law- parliament doesn’t have time to go over all detail
Local Knowledge - impossible for parliament to deal with the local requirements of every city and town

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Pros of delegated legislation

A

Saves parliamentary time
Access to technical expertise
Easy to amend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Cons of delegated legislation

A

Undemocratic
Difficulty wording

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Statutory Interpretation

A

Is the process of interpreting statues. Used by judges to help them interpret the law properly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Reasons we need statutory interpretation

A

Changes in the use of language
Draftsman may use a broad term
Ambiguous words
Archaic language

35
Q

The 3 Rules

A

Literal Rule
Golden Rule
Mischief Rule

36
Q

Literal Rule

A

The words in the statute are given their ordinary meaning. They will read it literally and not deviate eg Berriman Case (1946)

37
Q

Golden Rule

A

Used to prevent inconsistency and absurdity when interpreting and act literally
Has a ‘narrow approach’ eg Adler v. George and
‘wider approach’ eg RE Sigsworth (1935)

38
Q

Mischief Rule

A

This gives judegs more discretion than the literal and golden rule. It allows judges to look at the law before the statute was implemented to see the gap which the act was intended to cover

39
Q

Purposive Approach

A

Judicial consideration to the effect of their interpretation eg R v. Registar the applicant was refused a copy of his birth certificate because he was likely to murder his mother

40
Q

3 Rules surrounding latin terms

A

Ejusdem Generis - general words are interpreted in line with specific words
Expresio Unius - mention of one thing excludes another
Noscitar a sociis- words interpreted in context of the sentence they are used in

41
Q

Intrinsic Aids

A

Are explanations within the act itself that make it clearer eg: Long Title, Short Title and the Prelude

42
Q

Extrinsic Aids

A

External aids such as Hansard (the official record of everything said in parliament. Could only be used after Pepper v. Hart) , Dictionaries (published at the time the act was passed)

43
Q

Pros of extrinsic aids

A

Available for everybody to consult
Online
Can clear up what the original intent was in the bill’s discussion

44
Q

Cons of extrinsic aids

A

Statements made in debate may not be clear
Can be costly and a waste of legal personnel time

45
Q

Reports by law reform agencies

A

Law reform bodies such as the law commission publish reports where they highlight gaps or anomalies in the law. Permitted by Black-Clamson case

46
Q

Pros of reports

A

Problems in the current law are identified

47
Q

Cons of reports

A

Law commission reports are only available for limited areas of law

48
Q

Effects of EU Law on statutory interpretation

A

Courts must follow strict procedure to make sure that it is interpreted in line with EU Law

49
Q

Effects of Human Rights Act 1998 on statutory interpretation

A

Legislation must be read and given effects in a way which is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights

50
Q

Menadoza v. Ghaidan (2002)

A

Human Rights act overturned the decision of the rent

51
Q

Stare Decisis

A

Where you stand with the binding decision of the court

52
Q

Ratio Decidendi

A

The judgment itself in the case

53
Q

Obiter Dicta

A

The non-binding judge’s suggestions used going forward

54
Q

Where does judicial precedent fit into the court hierarchy?

A

The basic rule is that a court must follow the precedents of a higher court but are not bound to follow the ones in the lower courts

55
Q

Outline of Hierarchy

A

European Court of Justice
Supreme Court
Court Of Appeal
Divisional Courts

All other courts criminal and civil have no power to create precedents

56
Q

Exceptions to the rule

A

When the cases of human rights are involved. The courts cannot act in ways incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Must follow judgments and decisions of the EC of HR

57
Q

London Street Tramways v. London County Council (1898)

A

House of Lords decide they are bound by their own previous decisions

58
Q

Practice Statement (1966)

A

House of Lords will depart from their own previous decision when ‘it is right to do so’

59
Q

Conway v. Rimmer (1968)

A

First use of the practice statement

60
Q

R v. Shivpuri (1986)

A

First use of practice statement in criminal case

61
Q

Pepper v. Hart

A

Allows courts to use Hansard in statutory interpretation

62
Q

Richards v. Rickards (1989)

A

When a past decision has been made by mistake, per incuriam.

63
Q

Pros of the literal rule

A

.The literally rule follows the words that the democratically elected parliament has used

.The literal rule should make the law more certain as it is interpreted exactly

64
Q

Cons of the literal rule

A

.Assumes that very Act is perfectly drafted

.Words may have more than one meaning making the Act unclear

65
Q

Pros of the golden rule

A

.Where there is a problem with using the literal rule it provides an ‘escape route’

.The fact it’s used in limited situations prevents judges from making new law

.Allows judges to choose a more sensible meaning

66
Q

Cons of the golden rule

A

.It is very limited in use and used in rare occasions

67
Q

Pros of the mischief rule

A

.Promotes the purpose of the law as it allows judges to look back at the gap in the law which the Act was designed to cover eg Smith v. Hughes

.This approach is more likely to produce a ‘just’ result by making judges interpret the law in the way parliament intended

68
Q

Cons of the mischief rule

A

.Risk of judicial law making
.Use of mischief rule may lead to uncertainty
.Not as wide as purposive approach

69
Q

Pros of the purposive approach

A

.Leads to justice in individual cases
.Gives judges more discretion than using the literal meanings of words and create absurd situations

70
Q

Cons of the purposive approach

A

.Judges refuse to follow the clear words of Parliament
.Difficult to discover the intention of parliament
.Leads to uncertainty in the law

71
Q

Main reasons for law reform

A

.The law needs to adapt to changes in society
.We need law reform to clear up confused law

.The government has ultimate control of the law reform agenda but there are other influences too:
-Pressure Groups
-Law Commission
-Judgments

72
Q

The Law Commission as a body

A

Was set up as a permanent body in 1965. The chairman is a high court judge and he is assisted by four other qualified lawyers that serve as Law Commissioners.

The Law Commission focuses on:
-Keep under review all of the law
-Development and reform of law
-Codification which is writing down proposals for new law or clarifying old ones
-Repealing obscure or no longer relevant laws

73
Q

Codification

A

.Is bringing together all the law on one topic into one complete code of law
-The Draft Criminal Code incorporated the main general principle of criminal law but has never been implement by government

74
Q

Consolidation

A

.Is combining the law from several acts of parliament into one act of parliament
-Consolidation makes the law easier to understand and more accessible
-Needed because there might be several parts of different statues that spell put entire law

75
Q

Repeal

A

.Is where certain areas of law go out of date and need to be cancelled
-Repeal is the process of cancelling out an act of parliament. It can only be achieved by a vote in parliament. An example of this is the Great Repeal Bill.

76
Q

Advantage of reform through the law commission

A

.Research by legal experts
.Non-political
.Consultation before finalising proposals
.Whole areas of law can be considered

77
Q

Disadvantages of reform through the Law Commission

A

.Parliament can be slow at enacting Law Commission Reports
.Lack of parliamentary time

78
Q

Royal Commissions

A

.Are temporary committees set up to investigate changes in the law in one specific area.
-Have sometimes led to changes in the law
-Can only make recommendations

79
Q

Review by judges

A

.Judges can sometimes be asked to lead an investigation into specific area of law
-Woolf Committee on civil justice
-Lord Briggs 2015 on ODR

80
Q

Advantages of Royal Commissions

A

Focus of one are of Law
The use of experts

81
Q

Disadvantages of Royal Commissions

A

They can only make recommendations and this may not always be put into effect

82
Q

Advantages of review by judges

A

They bring in the experience of the legal system and courts
Business people bring in experience from a different perspective

83
Q

Disadvantages of review by judges

A

Takes up the judges time in the courts
Business people may not understand the system