Law and the Holocaust Flashcards
what were the three core concepts of nazi jurisprudence
- volksgemeinschaft
- fuhrerprinzip
- bewegung
examples of anti-jewish legislation
- laws regarding admission to the bar 1933
- laws regarding the overcrowding of german schools 1933
- the first decree of reich citzenship 1935
- law for the protection of german blood and honour
fuller on difference between english law and nazi law
not just that nazi law was immoral - it was enacted differently e.g. retroactively legislation, secret laws etc.
documents relating to the trasition from democracy to dictatorship
- reichstag fire decree 1933
- arrests without warrent or judical review 1933
- the enabling act 1933
- law for the imposition of the death penalty 1933
- law against the formation of new political parties 1933
- oaths of loyality for state officials 1934
what was the fuhrerprinzip
- leader principle
- core concept of NS constitutional law - the leader would articulate the true knowledge and will of the community and bring it to expression through action
what was the volksgmeinischaft
- the people’s community
- ‘blood and soil’ - the ties that held the volk together
- used to assert the legitimacy of the ruling order, discredit fundamental rights and de-legalise the position of the indivdual
what was the bewegung
- this means movement - the method by which the fuhrer knows and articulates the will of the volk
- the idea of dynamic movement is a way of justfying his actions - he is not bound by previous decisons and the law can develop in an ad hoc way
fraser - examples of continuarity from weimar to nazi regime
- sterlisation
- policing
- mass imprisonment of political enemies
penumbra cases
- Hart: when deciding cases of meaning and penumbra there is an element of considering what the law ought to be - the connection between law and morals (vehicle analogy)
- Fuller: questions hart’s penumbra and core analysis of judical interepretation - problems of interpretation are not restricted to the meaning of words - statutes can be difficult to interpret - more complex than hart makes out (?)
David Fraser - was there law?
the nazi period was full of law and all attempts to avoid this are dishonest
rundle - was there law?
- uses fuller’s 8 principles
- divides the period up and says there was no law after the night of the broken glass - total failure
- after 1938 - jews had no agency thus no law
rundle - example of klemperer
- married to an aryan women and escaped perscution many times
- his diaries show what living under nazi law was like
- show that the law intially provided security but after 1930 when the SS took over legal matters, laws began to run out
- rundle says his loss of agency is key
hart v fuller debate
- hart - it was law - legal positivism
- fuller - not law - natural law
hart and fuller - what was the main argument
connection between law and morality
what did hart say about the connection of law and morality?
there is no necessary relationship between a legal system and the ideas of justice and morality - the question of what law is separate from the q of what law should be
q of morality is a separate issue that is not relevant here
1942 - hitler appointed nazi as reich minister of justice
heralded the end of an independant judiciary
1942 guidelines for sentences
forced judges to render their verdicts in line with nazi idealogy or face public removal from their office
who was a jew?
person descended from two jewish grandparents belonging to the jewish religion or married to a jewish person on september 15th 1935 and persons decended from three or four jewish grandparents
oliver lepsius
questions why so many lawyers were prepared to abadon the values of democracy, fundamental rights and the rule of law in favour of a comparitively open and unspecified ideology
how did lepsius describe this period?
as a time of political and intelletual breakdown - however some may think there was a continuarity in legal thinking from the republic to national socialism
the development of law in national socialism
- deconstruction: the decline of the republic
- reconstruction: the build up and process of NS legal principles
delegalisation of the republic
- suspension of consitutional principles
- suspension of social pluralsim
- suspension of federalism
suspension of consitutional principles
- included the suspension of civil rights and a departure from the parliamentary system of government - main stages 1) the reichstag fire decree 2) the enabling act
- the WC remained in tact but the power and the consitution and the binding nature of the state was removed
- fundamental rights were deprived and law making was transferred to the executive