Law and Justice Flashcards
What is law?
- Law refers to the system of rules enacted and enforced by governmental institutions
What is justice?
- Justice is fairness, equality and even handedness. This means treating like cases in a like manner
What did Plato argue about justice?
- Plato saw justice as harmony between different classes or sectors of society
- Justice is an overarching virtue between individuals in society
What did Aristotle argue about justice?
- Aristotle argued the need for proportionality and achieving a middle way
What did Aquinas argue?
- Aquinas argued that justice governs relationships, dealing with people as they deserve
What are the three theories of justice?
- Distributive Justice
- Utilitarianism Justice
- Social Justice
What is distributive justice?
- The fair allocation of benefits and responsibilities of life
What did Aristotle argue about distributive justice?
- Aristotle argues that justice is how individuals deal with each other and how the state makes and enforces laws
- He stressed the need for proportionality
- Justice will apply differently to different situations. A distributive state will share out wealth based on merit and must allocate resources on the basis of people’s needs would be unjust
What did Thomas Aquinas argue about distributive justice?
- Justice governs our relationships with people
- The willingness to treat people as they deserve
- The end result of justice is the common good for individuals and society
- Due proportion is that people receive what they are due in accordance of merit and rank. It would be wrong to pay workers an equal amount
What did Karl Marx argue about distributive justice?
- ‘Each according to his ability, to each according to his need’
- Each will maximise their contribution by making full use of their abilities
- Each will receive according to their needs irrespective of their personal contribution
- However, Aristotle argued that the model is unjust as it could give the greatest reward to those who are least productive
What did Chaim Perelman argue about distributive justice?
- Did a study of justice ‘De La Justice 1944’
- Justice cannot be studied logically as it is dependent on subjective values
- He studied six different understandings of justice
What are the 6 different understandings of justice according to Chaim Perelman?
- To each according to his merits = Treated in the way they deserve
- To each according to his needs = Consistent with democracy
- To each according to his works = Based on contribution to society
- To each equality = Fair allocation of scarce resources
- To each according to rank = Superior officers or older people get more resources
- To each according to his legal entitlement = Rights-based system
What is utilitarianism?
- Maximising happiness is the object of justice
What did Jeremy Bentham argue about utilitarianism justice?
- He was a social reformer who argued that the more an action increases overall happiness, the more valuable it is
- They are interested in the outcome rather than the act
- This means that the interest of an individual may be sacrificed for the greater community happiness
What did John Stuart Mill argue about utilitarianism justice?
- Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness
- He focussed on the quality of the happiness
- Justice includes respect for people, property and rights
- Punishment may bring happiness however the punishment was also evil and can only be justified where it brings benefits
What is social justice?
- This is the ability people have to realise their own potential, everyone must have equal rights regardless of their place in society
What does John Rawls argue about social justice?
- Rawls argued two basic principles that justice is fairness
- Each person would have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others
- Social and economic inequalities may exist but only where they benefit the least advantaged members of society and provided all positions are open to everyone
What does Robert Nozick argue about social justice?
- He argues the entitlement theory of justice
1. This is the principle of acquisition which is dealing with how property is acquired
2. A principle of justice in transfer such as property changing hands
3. A principle of rectification of injustice which is dealing with injustices arising from the transfer of property under the two principles - If someone gains property according to these principles, they are entitled to it and if not, the third provides a remedy
What is procedural justice?
-
What is corrective justice?
What is substantive justice?