Law Flashcards

1
Q

What is constitutional law

A

It defines the structure and function of government and the relationship between the government and its’ citizens. It also defines the relative powers of the national and state governments and prohibits from taking certain actions, such as those that infringe on the freedom of religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are the powers of national and state governments limited?

A

By the constitutional guarantee of individual liberties and freedoms enshrined within the constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In what way can constitutional law be considered a process?

A

Constitutional law provides a language and a forum for the debate of important issues. The language of constitutional law begins with begins with the text of the Constitution and expands to the precedents that interpret it and the principles that can be drawn from it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Plessy v Ferguson

A

A court ruling in 1896 that allowed for racial segregation of railroad cars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Brown v Board of Education

A

A court ruling that exercised it’s discretionary adjudication to illustrate the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in educational facilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do we need constitutional law

A

Constitutional law provides a vernacularity and vocabulary and a process for dealing with important issues. It is neither the isolated and exclusively solitary vocabulary nor process, but it has been an important and familiar one for 200 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an originalist interpretation of the Constitution

A

A framework of evaluation that is plagued with the orientation of undergoing the assimilation and incorporation of the incipient intentionality that influenced the authors of the Constitution to devise the amendments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a nonoriginialist interpretation of the constitutional

A

The realization and apprehension of the convoluted and esoteric complexity that characterizes adequately assimilating an understanding and cognizance of the introductory volitional intentionality that characterizes the authors of the Constitution and instead prioritizes the extrapolation and distillation of the principles and precedence that were established via the ideational materialization of the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th amendments?

A

No person may be denied life, liberty and property without due process of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

Marbury v. Madison, 1803, was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

United States v Lopez

A

United States v. Alfonso D. Lopez, was a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Commerce Clause. It was the first case since 1937 in which the Court held that Congress had exceeded its power to legislate under the Commerce Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why was United States v Lopez important?

A

U.S. v. Lopez is a particularly significant case because it marked the first time in half a century that the Court held Congress had overstepped its power under the Commerce Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hamdi v Rumsfeld

A

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Commerce Clause

A

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . . The Commerce Clause gives Congress broad power to regulate interstate commerce and restricts States from impairing interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explicate the two categorically distinct types of rights.

A

The first group of rights is procedural rights. These rights are about the procedures the government must follow; how the government must behave when it acts with respect to an individual or, sometimes, a group.

The second group is substantive rights. These rights define the areas of individual freedom that the government cannot invade regardless of the procedures it follows.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of a procedural right.

A

If you are receiving social security benefits , the government can’t just take them away because some bureaucrat believes you are no longer entitled to them. Before your benefits can be cut off, your constitutional right to due process guarantees that you must receive notice of the governments claim and must have to opportunity to present your arguments about the issue at a hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give an example of a substantive right.

A

If the government wants to force you to attend a Catholic Mass, the constitutional issue is one of substance, not process. Even if the government gives you notice and a hearing, it cannot infringe on your substantive constitutional right to choose your own religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is due process?

A

Due process means that the government must follow fair procedures in taking action with respect to an individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Equal Protection Clause

A

The Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection. Equal protection forces a state to govern impartially—not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective.

20
Q

Regents of the University of California v Bakke

A

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a 1978 Supreme Court case which held that a university’s admissions criteria which used race as a definite and exclusive basis for an admission decision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

21
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

In U.S. constitutional law, when a court finds that a law infringes a fundamental constitutional right, it may apply the strict scrutiny standard to nevertheless hold the law or policy constitutionally valid if the government can demonstrate in court that the law or regulation is necessary to achieve a “compelling state interest”. The government must also demonstrate that the law is “narrowly tailored” to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the “least restrictive means” to achieve the purpose. Failure to show these conditions may result in a judge striking down a law as unconstitutional.

22
Q

Rational Relationship Test

A

In U.S. constitutional law, rational basis review is the normal standard of review that courts apply when considering constitutional questions, including due process or equal protection questions under the Fifth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment.

23
Q

Brandenburg v Ohio

A
24
Q

Stare decisis

A
25
Q

Litigation

A

The legal systems mechanism for resolving disputes between private parties.

26
Q

Civil procedure

A

The body of law that structures the mechanism of litigation.

27
Q

What is the basic process of litigation?

A

Litigation begins with a dispute between two or more people, companies or institutions. Any kind of dispute can initiate this process; an automobile accident, a broken contract, a sexual harassment claim by an employee, a civil rights claim against the government. If the disputants cannot settle their problems themselves, they can hire lawyers to negotiate, threaten, or otherwise try to resolve the dispute. If that doesn’t work either, it’s off to court.

28
Q

Plaintiff

A
29
Q

What is another way to think about litigation?

A

Litigation is a process of authoritative dispute resolution by the government.

30
Q

Civil litigation compared to criminal litigation

A
31
Q

The Law of Civil Procedure

A
32
Q

What were the results of a massive study that gathered statistics about civil litigation?

A

Out of 10,000 bad experiences, the injured party with view themselves as a victim in 1,000 of these cases. Of these people, 700 will complain to the wrongdoer, 300 will let it go. The wrongdoer will reject the claim in 450 of those cases, and the victim will go see a lawyer in about 100 of those cases. The lawyer will file a case in court in 50, and the parties will settle 25-35 of those cases, the court will dispose of most of the rest without trial, and perhaps 2-3 will actually go to trial, and only have of those will be jury trials.

33
Q

What might dissuade a lawyer from taking a particular case?

A

The perception in the deprivation of the profitability of the case

34
Q

Subject matter jurisdiction

A

The jurisdiction that authorizes a court to hear a specific type of case

35
Q

Personal jurisdiction

A

The jurisdiction that materializes the permissibility for a court to authoritatively adjudicate a verdict between two disputatious parties.

36
Q

What was the reasoning for establishing federal courts?

A

Some cases involve important national issues that should be decided by judge of the U.S. government rather any state judge. / A desideration to provide a neutral forum such that a resident that belongs to one state has the potentiality of litigating a resident of another.

37
Q

Federal question jurisdiction

A

The jurisdiction applied to federal courts for hearing cases involving federal law; environmental laws, social security, food and drug administration regulation, and violations of the constitution

38
Q

Diversity jurisdiction

A

A type of jurisdiction that was established to prevent prejudicial discrimination projected in the trajectory of an out-of-state resident from a state judge. Thus, this type of jurisdiction is also applied to the federal government.

39
Q

Conflicts of Law

A
40
Q

Complaint

A
41
Q

Plaintiff

A
42
Q

Defendant

A
43
Q

Judgement

A
44
Q

Default

A
45
Q

Class action

A