Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does the judiciary do?

A

Third branch of government, essential element of the separation of powers, as well as rule of law.

  • Checks & balances parliament through interpreting statute law.
  • High Court = interprets constitutional law.
  • Checks & balances executive - by ruling on the lawfulness of government administration & policy.
  • Creates common law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Expectations of Parliament - Law-making…

A

1) Participatory and responsive to public opinions.
2) Generally reflective of majority views.
3) Equitable (incorporate the rights of individuals and groups).
4) Directly accountable to society (elections).
5) Dynamic (open to change).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Expectations of Courts - Law-making…

A

1) Independent and not swayed by community (or parliamentary) pressures - independent of judiciary seen as one of the hallmarks of a democratic society.
2) Authoritative and consistent (decisions based on established authorities and legal traditions) and subject to appeal when this is doubt.
3) Equitable (recognise and individuals or groups right to due process and a fair trial).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why does Australia have a court hierarchy?

A

1) Allows cases to be allocated to an appropriate court based on complexity, seriousness of the case, and amount being claimed.
2) Consistency: greater consistency in judgements because lower courts must follow binding precedents set by higher courts.
3) Appeals: decisions of courts are not final - if there was a flaw in the original trial individuals have the opportunity to have their case re-heard in a higher court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Criminal Law? Give examples.

A

Criminal law is actions regarded as anti-social and dangerous to the community. Such actions are prohibited by statutes and prosecuted and punished by government.

E.g. Murder, robbery, rape, drink driving, trespassing…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Civil Law? Give examples.

A

Civil law is the body of law that regulated the ordinary private relationships in a community. These disputes can be adjudicated by civil courts.

E.g. divorce, contract disputes, property boundaries, defamation…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a summary offence?

A

A simple or minor criminal offence, heard through criminal summons in the Magistrates Court - drunk and disorderly & traffic offences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is indictable offence?

A

A serious criminal offence that is heard in District or Supreme Court. Generally heard by judge and jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is statutory interpretation?

A

The way that courts interpret and apply law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the reasons for statutory interpretation?

A

1) Word meanings
2) Time and changing circumstances
3) Drafting errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Word meanings…

A

Homonyms are same word with different meanings.

E.g. ‘Right’ - opposite of ‘left’ and ‘wrong’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Time and changing circumstances…

A

Old laws are written in the language of their time. Remain a law until amended or repealed by parliament.
Language can go out of date - meanings change over time.
- Keeps old laws up to date.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Drafting error…

A

Mistakes are made despite the precision of statutory construction and detailed processes of law-making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is In Futuro?

A

Latin for ‘in the future’.
Parliament write laws in ways that can take into account future situations.

Parliament leaves it to the courts to interpret statutes to fit new and evolving times. Why laws are written in broad general terms - allows laws to be flexible and adaptable to changing technologies and social values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the methods of statutory interpretation?

A

1) Maxims - ensure consistency.
2) Rules - declare the law.
3) Acts Interpretation Acts - passed by parliament which provide guidance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are maxims?

A

Maxims are rules of conduct. They are similar to ‘conventions’. They are unwritten rules that guide legal professionals in their work.

Types of maxims:

1) Ejusdem generis
2) Noscitur a sociis
3) Expressio unis est exclusio alterius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Ejusdem generis?

A

Latin for ‘of the same kind’.
Applied to a list of words where a general word appears after a list of specific words of a similar case. This allows courts to decide on a case by case basis id other things are of the same category.

E.g. The Disability Discrimination Act (1992) - states “For the purpose of this Act, an assistance animal is a dog or other animal trained to assist the person with a disability…” Parliament created a category of assistance animals, with dog as the example, but has allowed for future change in the use of animals and for the courts to add meaning to the law without changing the wording.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Noscitur a sociis?

A

Latin for ‘by the company it keeps - to know a thing by it associates.’
i.e. look at the surrounding words for its context.

E.g. The work ‘disability’ when alone can mean many thing - medial, legal (bankruptcy), less able to perform, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Expressio unis est exclusion aterius?

A

Latin for ‘express mention of one excludes all others’.
Parliament may list a series of specific things in a class/category.
Unlike general terms allowing for ejusdem generis, the use of specific terms without a general term following prevents courts from expanding the class/category.

E.g. Taxi Act of WA (1994) - explicitly refers to a taxi vehicle capable of carrying up to 4 passengers - therefore, vehicles such as minibuses or buses do not come under this law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the three main rules of statutory interpretation?

A

1) Literal rule
2) Golden rule
3) Purpose (mischief) rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the literal rule?

A

A rule for statutory interpretation in which the courts apply the standard dictionary definition of a work in a statutes.
i.e. the courts use the ordinary meaning of the language within the statute - Act is read literally.

E.g. GST Act define taxi travel. In Uber B.V. vs Commissioner of Taxation of Commonwealth of Australia (2017) - the Federal Court read the GST Act literally giving the works of ‘taxi travel’ their literal/ordinary meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the golden rule?

A

A rule of statutory interpretation in which the court seeks alternative meanings of a word in a statute if the literal meaning results in absurd or unjust outcomes.

E.g. Taxicab once meant ‘one horse vehicle for hire’. If courts use literal interpretation of this word, there would be no taxis or Ubers on our roads despite there being thousands of motorised vehicles for hire.
Definition no longer relevant - golden rule used to help statutes keep up with changing society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the purpose rule?

A

A rule for statutory interpretation which the court seeks the original purpose of the statute.

i. e. the mischief it was meant to prevent.
- courts may refer to the Hansard to seek purpose of the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Purpose rule - extraneous sources…

A

Dictionaries, specialised legal dictionaries, other Acts, Hansards, and documentary sources may be used to assist in the search of purposive interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Purpose rule - extraneous sources…

A

Dictionaries, specialised legal dictionaries, other Acts, Hansards, and documentary sources may be used to assist in the search of purposive interpretation.

16
Q

Acts Interpretation Acts…

A

Judges have always had some degree of judicial discretion when interpreting statutes. Judicial discretion is the freedom of a judge to decide an appropriate outcome for a particular case within the bounds of the law.

17
Q

Conservative/literal judges…

A

Rely heavily on literal interpretations of statutes.
i.e. the law says what it means and means what it says.

These judges are reluctant to change the meaning of statutes through interpretation - they believe this is the task/role of the parliament as the legislative branch.

These interpretations are predictable and consistent = upholding the rule of law; however, they may not be fair.

18
Q

Activist judges…

A

More likely to use their discretion in order to keep the statute updates and in with social, economic, technological, and cultural change.

These judges more readily use the golden and purpose rules.

Judges know that parliamentary statutes are superior to common law decisions and their interpretation can be overridden at any time.

Activist interpretation is less predictable and consistent, which is not good for the rule of law; however, they are more likely to be fair.

19
Q

What is the Plain English Laws.

A

An approach in reforming statutory construction through using plain English instead of legal jargon.

Laws are now written in plain English, making them more accessible and readable, this makes it easier for lawyers and ordinary people to understand statutes - good for uphold rule of law & courts can decipher the meaning of law more easily if it is written in ordinary language.

20
Q

What is Acts Interpretation Acts?

A

Second approach by passing Acts known as Acts Interpretation Acts.

Are statutes that force judges to interpret other statutes according to a law made by parliament. They are a firm attempt by parliament to limit judicial discretion in statutory interpretation.

Rule of law and parliament supremacy means judges are legally bound to follow Act Interpretation Acts when interpreting other statutes.

21
Q

What is the common law legal system?

A

Judgements are developed over time based on previous judgements of the courts.
These form precedents that are binding on lower courts in the hierarchy.

Used in: Great Britain, Australia, USA.

21
Q

What is the civil law legal system?

A

Laws are codified in a written collection of laws that must be followed by judges.

Used in: Indonesia, France, Germany, Brazil.

22
Q

How does common law work?

A

1) An overarching principle that underpins the entire system.
2) A doctrine that is applied by courts in every case.
3) A court hierarchy within these operate.

23
Q

Stare decisis: the overarching principle…

A

Stare decisis that is Latin for ‘to stand on what has been decided.’
Basis of doctrine of precedent, that judges should abide by past judgements.

Ensures judicial decisions are similar for similar circumstances.

Results in fairness, predictability, predictability, consistency, but also flexibility if a court is convinced that no similar cases exists. New judgement becomes part of case law - also allows law to adapt to new circumstances.

24
Q

What is a precedent?

A

A judge made decision that stands as an example/guide for future decisions in cases of similar factual circumstances.

25
Q

What is ratio decidendi?

A

Latin for ‘reason for deciding’.
Judges must explain their judicial reasoning - enhanced the openness and transparency of court proceedings.

The Ratio is the reason/core principles underlying a court judgement and is the critical component of precedent.
The judge must decide if the reasoning of a past case applies - if not stare decisis applies. If not, the judge can create a new ratio decidendi.

26
Q

What is O biter dicta?

A

Latin for ‘sayings by the way’.
Judges comments on other cases illustrate and clarify their judgements.
The Obicter is not binding, but may influence subsequent decisions.

27
Q

What is the doctrine of precedent?

A

The doctrine of precedent requires a ranked court hierarchy to operated within. The three essential elements that allow the doctrine to operate include:

1) Ratio decidendi of judges in higher courts may create new common law through appeals.
2) Precedents of higher courts bind lower courts within the same hierarchy,
3) Higher courts may be persuaded by the ratio decideni and obiter dicta of lower or equivalent courts.

28
Q

What is the court hierarchy?

A

Depending of what level a court is will determine how a precedent applies.

1) SUPERIOR COURTS: High Court, Federal Court + state and territory, Supreme Courts. These hear the most serious & complex cases, also have appellate jurisdiction.
2) INTERMEDIATE COURTS: District/Country courts of each state/territory. Hear serious cases & have appellate jurisdiction.
3) INFERIOR COURTS: state and territory magistrates courts. Hear summary cases and have no appellate jurisdiction.

29
Q

What is a binding precedent?

A

Decision of a higher court that must be followed by a lower court in the same hierarchy.

30
Q

What is a persuasive precedent?

A

A precedent that may be used by a court in reaching a judgement but they are not bound to follow it. Courts at the same level are not required to follow the precedent, but may be influenced by it.

31
Q

What are the precedent principles?

A

1) Precedents are exclusively set by superior courts.
2) All lower courts are bound by the decisions of higher courts in the same hierarchy.
3) Decisions by courts at same level are not binding.
4) Decisions of courts provide legal principles upon which precedents are created.

32
Q

What is justice?

A

Justice is society’s concept of fairness. Justice requires that legal processes are based on consistent rules applied in an unbiased manner and that individual laws are based on prevailing social values and fundamental human rights.

33
Q

What are the 4 key principles of natural justice?

A

1) Impartial adjudication
2) Hearing both parties
3) Evidence based decisions
4) Open trials to deliver public confidence.

33
Q

What are legal rights?

A

Both parties to a trial have legal rights, including the right to a fair trial. The accused has additional legal rights to increase their protection.

E.g. Golden thread of justice - innocent until proven guilty.

34
Q

What is the adversarial trial system?

A

Based on the assumption that the truth is best discovered by a contest between the parties in a dispute. Competition brings out the best evidence & argument before an impartial adjudicator

35
Q

What is the inquisitorial system?

A

Based on the assumption that the truth is best discovered through inquiry by an expert impartial adjudicator.

36
Q

Alternative dispute resolution includes…

A

1) Negotiation
2) Mediation
3) Conciliation
4) Arbitration

37
Q

What is negotiation?

A

Involves disputing parties talking to each other until a resolution is agreed.
They may agree to differ, to compromise or to reach consensus.
Only parties are directly involved.

38
Q

What is mediation?

A

Mediators = trained in dispute resolution techniques.
Involves a mediator as a neutral and impartial third party acting between parties.
Assist parties in finding common ground.
Useful when relationship has been deteriorated - families.

39
Q

What is conciliation?

A

Neutral and impartial 3rd party assists disputing parties to find agreement.
More active that mediators.
Seek optimal solution.
Used between employees and employers.

40
Q

What is arbitration?

A

More rule based & procedural.

Involves strict rules and procedures that both parties must adhere during process.

40
Q

What is the standard of proof?

A

The degree of certainty required to demonstrate that the defendant committed a civil wrong or a crime.

  • Civil dispute: balance of probabilities.
  • Criminal dispute: beyond reasonable doubt.
41
Q

Burden/Onus of proof…

A

This is placed on the person who makes a legal claim.

i.e. the plaintiff (civil) or prosecution (criminal) - they are required to substantiate their claim with evidence.

42
Q

What is a remedy?

A

The orders made by a court in a civil dispute to compensate a successful plaintiff for the wrong committed against them by the defendant.

43
Q

What is a sanction?

A

The sentences applied by the courts to a person who has been found guilty of an offence. Sanctions include fines, community service orders and imprisonment.

44
Q

What is the plaintiff?

A

The person who brings an action in a civil case, generally to seek damages from another person who has wronged them.

45
Q

What is the prosecution?

A

The legal counsel who presents the evidence against the accused. This is done on behalf of the State by the Department of Public Prosecutions.

45
Q

What is the defendant?

A

The person, company or organisation that defends a civil action. Also a person charged with a criminal offence. Known as the accused.

45
Q

What is beyond reasonable doubt?

A

The standard of proof required in a criminal case. The prosecution must provide evidence to show that there is no plausible explanation of the case other than the guilt of the accused.

46
Q

What is balance of probabilities?

A

This is the standard of proof required in a civil dispute. The likelihood of one party’s version of events being more probable to have occurred than not