Law Flashcards
Special damages
Compensation to cover the financial losses and expenses incurred as a result of an accident.
Aims to put you back in financial position that would’ve been before the accident
General damages
Compensation awarded for pain, suffering and loss of amenity means the inability to complete activities either temporarily or permanently
An award to compensate you for actual injuries suffered
The three track system
The court will allocate the case to one of three tracks for the hearing
County courts hear all cases
High court hears some fast track and most multi track cases
Small claims track
Small claims track - simple claims no more than £5k informal hearing
Limited grounds for appeal
Fast track
Streamlined procedure
Claims up to £5k to £25k
Multi track
Flexible procedure over £25,000 high value complex claims
Disadvantages of going to court
Delay , preliminary stages add to the length of ease ADR may be quicker
Expensive
Inequality of power / richer businesses may be able to afford better lawyers
Civil court heirarchy
Supreme Court ^ Court of appeal ^ High court ^ County court
When should ADR be used
Typically cheaper and faster then resorting to courts. Considered as a
efficient method of achieving an outcome
Arbitration
Involves the process in which the dispute is resolved by the decision of an arbitrator
Runs a tribunal process and decisions are binding
Advantage : quicker
Disadvantage: can be expensive
Conciliation
Generally used for employment situations. Conciliator will discuss the issues and try to help both parties reach an agreement. Often providing their own opinion at help form a settlement.
Advantage: cheaper than taking dispute to court , conciliator is usually legal expert
Disadvantage: no decision is guaranteed at the end
Mediation
When an impartial person or mediator trained in dealing with difficult discussions between 2 opposing sides acts like a referee in a dispute.
Advantage: private , cost efficient, control
Disadvantage: no certainty in resolving dispute.
Foreseeable harm
Foreseeability asks whether a person could or should reasonably have foreseen the harms that resulted from their actions.
If resulting harms were foreseeable, a defendant might successfully prove that they were not liable.
The doctrine of Precedent in hierarchy
Precedent is the system where judges follow the decisions made in cases previous cases.
When a judge decides a case they have to justify their decision, they do so by stating the relevant law and applying it to the facts of the case before the court , this mean that lawyers use decided cases to work out the law and the law can be applied to the facts of a new case.
Negotiation
A direct discussion between two parties to find a solution to their dispute.
Advantage: completely private, quick and informal
Disadvantage: involving solicitor may be costly, may not come to agreement