Language & the Brain Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is aphasia?

A

uneven patterns of language behaviour following brain damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What impairments do people with Broca’s (expressive) aphasia face?

A

they understand but can’t produce language (orally or written) → lost ability to express grammatical relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What impairments do people with Wernicke’s (receptive) aphasia face?

A

they produce nonsensical language → unable to produce paragrammatic speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Broca’s aphasics have impairments in expressing ____ gestures

A

interactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Wernicke’s aphasics have impairments in expressing ____ gestures

A

referential

those referring to an aspect of the conversation’s content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What impairment do people with conductive aphasia face?

A

they are able to understand and produce speech but can’t repeat what’s heard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is pure word deafness?

A

patients are unable to comprehend language auditorily, although they are still capable of comprehending visual language and producing language in either modality

(due to damaged auditory nerve & loss of corpus callosum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe how Geschwind’s Model of Language Processing describes the path that visual input follows to reach the brain

A

starting at visual regions > angular gyrus > Wernicke’s area (meaning) > Broca’s area (motor commands) via arcuate fasciculus > speech muscles

If only the arcuate fasciculus is damaged, it results in conduction aphasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Broca’s aphasics were believed to lack syntactical knowledge. What evidence disproved this belief?

A

Broca’s patients are unable to activate words quickly enough to use them in normal comprehension. Even though they show automatic spreading activation similar to that of individuals without brain damage, it is slower than normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is functional lateralisation?

A

the tendency for a given psychological function to be served by one hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The right hemisphere uses ____ processing, which involves the activation of ____, while
The left hemisphere uses ____ processing, involving the activation of ____

A

holistic, a single mental representation of a stimulus

relational, at least two distinct representations that are related to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Saygın et al. (2004) examined aphasic patients’ comprehension of visually presented action stimuli in both linguistic and non-linguistic domains. What did they find?

A

Aphasia impairs linguistic (more pronounced) & non-linguistic task performance which correlates with aphasia severity. However, there is no correlation between linguistic & non-linguistic task performance (perhaps this holds only for severe aphasics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which language processes did Saygın et al. (2004) find were particularly impaired in aphasics?

A

conceptual/semantic processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is auditory language lateralised (Gurunandan et al., 2020)?

A

it is bilateral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is language production lateralised (Gurunandan et al., 2020)?

A

it is exclusively left lateralised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is does learning a non-native language affect language production lateralisation (Gurunandan et al., 2020)?

A

it has no effect - it is and remains left lateralised

17
Q

how does increased non-native language profficiency influence lateralisation for reading comprehension, speech comprehension, and language production (Gurunandan et al., 2020)?

A

lateralisation converges (increases) for reading comprehension & speech comprehension, and
diverges (decreases) for comprehension and production

18
Q

Increasing non-native language profficiency ____ lateralisation for ____ and ____ , but not for ____ which remaines left lateralised (Gurunandan et al., 2020)

A

increases
reading
speech comprehension
speech production

19
Q

What is the role of the right hemisphere in language according to the fMRI study by Sollmann et al. (2014)?

A

it integrates, contextualises, and infers meaning from language

20
Q

Sollmann et al. (2014) found right hemisphere cortical regions causally related to single-word production. What other regions did they find?

A

Male- and female-specific language regions, speech-motor control regions, and cortical regions supporting language task performance

21
Q

Which three functional groups can the right hemisphere language regions be divided into (Sollmann et al., 2014)?

A

the no-response-dominant group (trIFG, MTG, anG), the performance-error-dominant group (opIFG, STG), and the hesitation-error-dominant group (MFG, SMG)

22
Q

What are the 4 features of the language network named by Malik-Moraleda et al. (2022)?

A
  1. its location with respect to other systems — perceptual, cognitive and motor—systems;
  2. lateralisation to the LH (in most individuals)
  3. strong functional integration among the different components
  4. selectivity for linguistic processing
23
Q

Why did Malik-Moraleda et al. (2022) use the longer naturalistic cognition paradigms in addition to the language localiser tasks?

A

to examine functional connectivity between regions - these tasks would locate synchronous vs. asynchronous activity among brain regions

24
Q

What conclusion can be drawn from the following graph(Malik-Moraleda et al., 2022)?

A

That there is a modest but identical similarity in language region brain activity between speakers of different languages and speakers of the same language