Language change Flashcards

General

1
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and an example (2)

Borrowing

Lexis

A
  1. Taking words from other languages
  2. Karaoke
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Affixation

Lexis

A
  1. Means “to fasten” - attaching either a preffix or suffix to a pre existing word
  2. Microbiology, eco-friendly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Compounds

Lexis

A
  1. Words formed from joining together two other words in their entirety with or without a hyphen
  2. laptop, see-through
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Blending

Lexis

A
  1. When parts of words are chopped off and put together to form a new word
  2. smog = smoke + fog, blog = web + log
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Eponym/Proprietary Names

Lexis

A
  1. When a word is coined from a company name/ the name of the inventor of a product
  2. Hoover, Walkman
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Acronym

Lexis

A
  1. A word made up of the first letters of a phrase, which is pronounced as if it were a usual word
  2. RADAR (Radio Detection And Ranging), TARDIS (Time And Relative Dimension In Space), NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Initialism

Lexis

A
  1. A word made up of the first letters of a phrase, where the letters are individually pronounced
  2. CD, FBI, SAS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Provide a definiton

Coinage/neologism

Lexis

A
  • The creation of completely new words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and an example (2)

Back-formation

Lexis

A
  1. The removal of part of a word
  2. Editor = edit

May change class or meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and an example (2)

Clipping

Lexis

A
  1. A more drastic form of back formation, creating new words by extracting an arbitrary portion of a longer word

Does not change word class or meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and an example (2)

Jargon

Lexis

A
  1. Lexis specific to a particular job or interest. Requires previous knowledge
  2. Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia (fear of long words)

Yep that’s genuine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and an example (2)

Narrowing

Semantics

A
  1. When the meaning of a particular word becomes more specific
  2. meat (used to mean all food)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and an example (2)

Broadening

Semanitcs

A
  1. When a word takes on additional new meanings
  2. Bussiness (used to be someone who is busy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Amelioration

Semantics

A
  1. When the meaning of a word becomes more positive
  2. Pretty (used to mean sly or cunning), wicked (can now mean great)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Pejoration

Semantics

A
  1. When the meaning becomes less favourable/more negative
  2. “Hussy” (used to be housewife)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Provide a definiton (1) and examples (2)

Metaphorical extension/idiomatic usage

Semantics

A
  1. When words acquire new meanings because they have been used metaphorically
  2. Over the moon, under the weather, in the doghouse
17
Q

Einar Haugen’s stages of standardisation

Stage 1

Orthography

A

Selection of an existing language as the basis for the standard

18
Q

Einar Haugen’s stages of standardisation

Stage 2

Orthography

A

Codification involving the reduction in variability and the establishment of ‘norms’

19
Q

Einar Haugen’s stages of standardisation

Stage 3

Orthography

A

Elaboration which ensures the standard can be used for a range of functions

20
Q

Einar Haugen’s stages of standardisation

Stage 4

Orthography

A

Implementation – more texts become available, pride in the standard and the discouragement of alternatives

21
Q

Provide a definition for

Accent Levelling

Phonetics

A

People’s accents converge (become more similar to those around them). Upward convergence is where a person’s accent becomes more ‘upper class’, i.e. in a formal situation, whereas downward convergence is where a person’s accent becomes less received, perhaps as a method of decreasing social class differentiations

22
Q

Provide a definition for

Accent strengthening

Phonetics

A

People’s accents diverge (become less similar to those around them). This has often been considered to be a reflection upon the desire to emphasise differences in dialect and status.

23
Q

Provide the time period of (1) definition for (2) and examples of (3)

Vowel shift

Phonetics

A
  1. 1300-1500
  2. A change in the pronunciation of all long vowel sounds that took place between the Middle English and Early Modern English period.
  3. “Nail and “name have different spellings – they were once pronounced differently, though they are not anymore
24
Q

Provide a defintion for (1) and an example of (2)

Prescriptivism

Standardisation

A
  1. Prescribes how language should be in order to be better or pure; uses criteria of good/bad language, where standard forms are seen as good; draws its model of language from dictionaries, grammar books, etc
    2.rejects non-standard forms (e.g. slang, dialect, etc), language change is seen as decay of a pure form of language to be resisted and challenged, based on the golden age of the past.
25
Q

Provide a definition for/examples of

Descriptivism

Standardisation

A
  • Describes the nature of language variations without judgement; uses criteria of standard/non-standard, or appropriateness in context; draws its model from how language is used by a variety of people in a variety of contexts; recognises importance of a standard form but accepts the many variations to it as legitimate and acceptable; language change is seen as part of the progress of language; believes language is worthy of study and recognition wherever it is used.