Language and Communication Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Is language unique to humans? (nativism vs darwinism)

A

Yes (Nativism) - Animals lack a common universal code of communication, human communication appears to be markedly different than that of any other living creature.

No (Darwinism) - Dog’s still have some understanding of human language and have an ability communicate between each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is symbolic vocal communication?

A

This is how an individual communicates what they want through their voice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the evolutionary advantage of symbolic vocal communication?

A

It is easier to coordinate groups for hunting which helps survival.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Noam Chomsky separate language into?

A
  • Faculty of language in the broad sense

- Faculty of language in the narrow sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is faculty of language in the broad sense?

A

The existence of language in some biological capacity that allows you to master communication without explicit instruction.

Includes:

  • sensory-motor system - physical means to be able to speak via opening your mouth
  • conceptual-intentional system - provides the meaning behind what we are trying to say and the intention behind it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is faculty of language in the narrow sense?

A

It is an abstract linguistic computational system consisting of two structures:

  • Deep structure - abstract level of structural rules used to determine meaning of sentences and structure in which they should be presented.
  • Surface structure - how a sentence is represented, the way an utterance is made and something is written
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is recursion?

A

Rules can be applied more than once in generating sentences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the vervet monkey alarm calls show?

A

They had different calls for different threat levels, telling them whether to head for low bushes, high into the trees or stand up and scan. This behaviour was shown even when there was no threat which shows it is a learned behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Vervet monkey alarm calls - FLB vs FLN?

A

FLB - there is a vocal communication and intention to communicate (just the call elicits a response and it is an acquired skill) which indicated there is a possession of FLB.

FLN - inconclusive as there are only 3 calls with no abstract linguistic computational system. However, we do not know if they can do more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why do monkeys not have the same level of communication as us?

A

Anatomical reasons - humans have a longer oral cavity and lower larynx that allows for production of a greater range of sounds. Also, monkeys do not have voluntary motor control of the larynx in their brains whereas humans do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Nim Chimpsky show us with regard to sign language?

A
  • He mastered the ability to sign 125 words
  • He could make 2 to 4 word utterances
  • Had 20,000 sign combinations (of which 50% were 2 sign combinations)
  • Did not have own initiative as most signs were in response to the trainer and lots were imitations
  • He had the mental capacity of a 1.5 year old human.
  • This showed possession of intent not communication and the difference between deep and surface structure.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did studies into animal communication overall show?

A

There is evidence of FLB not FLN, and really it is just pavlovian conditioning not actual sense of language in the narrow sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can monkeys learn human grammar?

A

In an easy condition - yes, but not in the hard condition which indicates that really they are just good memorisers and do not actually have a FLN capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is language unique to humans? (FLN vs FLB)

A

No - FLB is shared with other species as there is enough evidence to show animals have the intention and motor system available to communicate.

Yes - FLN is unique to humans as animals don’t seem to have the structural and meaningful capacity. However, we still do not know if this behaviour is innate or learned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Paul Broca find about language and the brain?

A

Patients with lesions in the left inferior frontal gyrus had language impairments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Broca-Aphasia?

A

The loss of ability to produce language, difficulty in initiating speech, which is non fluent, laboured and halting.

17
Q

What did Carl Wernicke find?

A

Lesions in the temporo-parietal junction lead to aphasias in language.

18
Q

What is wernicke-aphasia?

A

There are no issues in the expression of language but instead with the meaning behind it, they have no problems with structure in terms of grammar but cannot understand the meaning behind language.

19
Q

How does the Wernicke-Geschwind model work?

A

Written information goes to the angular gyrus where language is changed from graphemes into phonemes, this is then sent to wernickes area to be understood for meaning, then to brocas area to be processed for response, finally then to the motor cortex to be actioned.

20
Q

What do we need to be aware of with the Wernicke-Geschwind model?

A

Neuropsychological evidence - can the model predict:

  • language deficits produced by damage to various parts of the cortex
  • effects of brain surgery
  • electrical brain stimulation on language

Neurocognitive evidence - can the model explain:

  • the contribution of hemispheres
  • brain activity observed in different tasks.
21
Q

What is the problem with brain damage and aphasia?

A

Often lesions damage more than one area so it is difficult to precisely determine what area has been affected with regards to language.

22
Q

How do brain surgery effects contradict the Wernicke-Geschwind model?

A

When Brocas/Wernickes area have been removed there have been immediate effects, but as the brain is plastic they have just learned to use other areas to adapt and use for language so there are no long lasting effects.

23
Q

How has brain stimulation contradicted the wernicke-geschwind model?

A

Some areas dependent on apparently brocas area are seen elsewhere in the brain which shows that language areas are more e widespread in the brain than originally thought.

24
Q

How do the two hemispheres appear to work together in language processing?

A

The left hemisphere - most functions especially with verbal communciation.

The right hemisphere - read and understand numbers and letters, write, prosody of an utterance.

The two hemispheres work together to produce language.

25
Q

What are the three basic assumptions of neurocogntive evidence?

A
  1. Speaking, reading, and understanding recruit underlying basic mechanisms that process phonology, semantics and grammar.
  2. Brain areas that involve language processing may involve other areas too.
  3. Brain areas that involve language processing are small, widely distributed, and highly specialised.
26
Q

What are graphemes?

A

Different ways we can write and ways that written language can be pronounced.

27
Q

How does phonological differentiation work?

A

We are all born with the ability to differentiate between phonemes, but as we get older our culture makes us keep or lose these abilities. For example, Germans cannot differentiate between v and w and Japanese and Chinese children lose the ability to produce l and r sounds.