Landmarks Flashcards
Zhang 2005 NEJM
Comparison medical vs surgical management for early pregnancy failure
70% success miso D3, 84% miso D8
97% success ERPOC
No difference in acceptability
RCT
652 participants
800mcg PV miso
Faults: unblinded, didnt include heavy bleeding, anembryonic overrepresented, one country
SPIN 2010 Blood
LMWH and aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss
Aspirin 75mg + LMWH 40mg + Monitoring VS monitoring alone
294 participants. RCT.
No improvement in unexplained pregnancy loss (both ~20%)
Faults: unblinded, no definition pregnancy loss, looked at 2 rather than 3 previous miscarriages
ALIFE 2010 Kandoorp, NEJM
Aspirin + heparin live birth rate
Aspirin 80mg + LMWH vs Aspirin vs Placebo
NO difference in live birth rate (both ~55%)
RCT
Faults: 2 rather than 3 mc, only 85% adherence, use of LMWH not blinded
Million Women 2003 Lancet
effect of HRT on breast ca incidence + mortality
COHORT study, breast cancer and HRT
Women recruited from breast screening, UK, 50-64
After 10 years of HRT: breast cancer +5/1000 E, +19/1000 E+P (6/1000 @ 5years for E+P)
Tibolone also increased risk of breast cancer
Past users at time of randomisation were not at increased risk of breast cancer
WHI E+P 2002 JAMA
Risks benefits HRT on 1 (CHD + Breast Ca)
RCT
CHD +7 (*)
Breast ca +8
Stroke +8, PE +8
Total extra risk events: 19 per 10 000 woman years
DECREASED: colon -6, hip # -5.
WHI E only 2004 JAMA
NO difference: CHD, breast ca, mortality
INcrease: Stroke, DVT
Decrease: hip #
SROM related landmarks (4)
TERMPROM: IOL vs expectant, no change NN sepsis or CS, reduces chorio RR 0.5
PPROMPT: increases RDS + CS, no reduce NN sepsis
ORACLE: erythromycin improved (death, CLD, uss)
ORACLE FU: no diff in diff abx
PTB related (3)
PROGESTERONE @ risk PTB: RR 0.5 (100mg PV)
PROGESTERONE SHORT CX <15mm: RR 0.5
MGS04 Neuro: CP RR 0.68, Gross motor RR 0.61
STEROIDS (3)
L8 preterm: RR0.8, less severe resp
ASTECS (elCS >37): less SCBU RR 0.46
ACTORDS (repeat <32): Less RDS + morbidity
DIABETES (2)
HAPO: increased BSL increase adverse (LGA, CS< hypoG, C peptide)
ACHOIS: Rx GDM RR perinatal morbid (NND,birth injury) RR 0.33
PET (3)
CLASP: no change in PET/SGA, but less PTB
HYPITAT: IOL>36,improved mat outcome RR 0.71
MAGPIE: RR 0.42 for eclamptic seizures
DELIVERY (4)
ARRIVE: IOL 39-39+4, reduce CS rate, no change NN perimort
TRUFFLE: survival highest for DV w no A wave change
TERM BREECH: less perinatal mort RR 0.23, morbid RR 0.36
CS TWINS: CS does not alter NN death/serious morbid mort if leading ceph
WOMAN: less death from bleeding if within 3 hours RR 0.8
Markov model
Simulates large hypothetical cohorts of patients that are followed through the model over time
Ovarian conservation at time of hysterectomy for benign disease
Chosen because women may enter or exit various health states after surgery
Ovarian conservation at time of hysterectomy for benign disease
Markov model
40-80yo
4 strategies: oophorectomy with or without oestrogen replacement, conservation with or without estrogen replacement
Primary outcome: survival to age 80, ovarian, CHD, hip fracture, breast cancer, stroke
Results
<55 removal caused 8.58% increase in all cause mortality by age 89
<59 = 3.92% increase
Retaining ovaries until at least 65 has long term survival benefits for women at average risk ovarian cancer