Landlord-Tenant Law Flashcards
What are the for leasehold (nonfreehold estates)?
- Tenancy for Years (aka Estate for Years or Term of Years)
- Periodic Tenancy
- Tenancy at Will
- Tenancy at Sufferance
What is a tenancy for years (aka estate for years or term of years)?
- This is a lease for a fixed period of time; doesn’t mean has to endure quite literally years.
- When you know the termination date from the start, you have a tenancy for years.
- Because the term of years states from the outset when it will terminate no notice is needed to terminate.
- A term of years greater than one year must be in writing to be enforceable because of the Statute of Frauds.
What is a periodic tenancy?
- This is a lease which continues for sucessive (continuous) intervals until L or T give notice to terminate.
- The periodic tenancy can be created expressly. For example, L conveys to T from month-to-month or year-to-year, or week-to-week.
- Can also arise by implication.
What are the three ways that a periodic tenancy arises by implication?
- Land is leased with no mention of duration, but provision is made for the payment of rent at set intervals.
- Ex: T rents an apartment from L, beginning June 1. Nothing is said about duration. T pays rent each
month. T is an implied month-to-month periodic tenant.
- Ex: T rents an apartment from L, beginning June 1. Nothing is said about duration. T pays rent each
- An oral term of years in violation of the Statute of Frauds creates an implied periodic tenancy measured by the way rent is tendered.
- Ex: L and T negotiate on the telephone for a commercial lease. They orally agree on a five-year
lease with rent at $1,000 a month. Not a tenancy for years because violations SoF.
- Ex: L and T negotiate on the telephone for a commercial lease. They orally agree on a five-year
- The holdover: In a residential lease, if L elects to hold over a T who has wrongfully stayed on past the conclusion of the original lease, an implied periodic tenancy arises, measured by the way rent is now tendered.
- T holds over after the expiration of her one-year lease, but sends another month’s rent check to L,
who cashes it. By cashing it, L creates an implied month-to-month periodic tenancy.
- T holds over after the expiration of her one-year lease, but sends another month’s rent check to L,
How is a periodic tenancy terminated?
Usually written notice must be given. At common law, at least equal to the period itself unless otherwise agreed.
- Thus, in a month-to-month periodic tenancy: one months notice.
- In a week-to-week periodic tenancy: one week notice.
The one exception:
- If the tenancy is from year-to-year or greater: 6 months notice.
- In VA, 3 months notice.
Note 1: By private agreement, the parties may lengthen or shorten these common-law prescribed notice provisions.
Note 2: The periodic tenancy must end at the conclusion of a natural lease period.
What is a tenancy at will? Can a tenancy at will be terminated?
- This is a tenancy for no fixed duration. For example, “To T for as long as L or T desires.”
- Must expressly agree. Unless the parties expressly agree to a tenancy at will, the payment of regular rent will cause a court as an implied periodic tenancy.
- The tenancy at will may be terminated by either party at anytime BUT a reasonable demand to vacate is usually needed.
What is a tenancy at sufferance? How is a tenancy at sufferance terminated?
It is created when T has wrongfully held over, past the expiration of the lease. We give this wrongdoer a leasehold estate (the tenancy at sufferance), to **permit L to recover rent. **
The tenancy at sufferance lasts only until L either evicts T or elects to hold T to a new tenancy.
In regards to T’s duties, what is T’s responsibility/liability to third parties?
T is responsible for keeping the premises in good repair.
T is liable for injuries sustained by third parties T invited, even where L promised to make the repairs.
What is T’s duty to repair when the lease is silent?
- The standard: T must maintain the premises and make ordinary repairs.
- T must not commit waste.
- Volunary waste - overt destruction; T intentionally or negligently damages the leased premises; Exploit minerals on property unless provided that T may do so or land previously used as such.
- Permisive waste - Neglect; When T fails to make ordinary repairs to keep leased premises in the same condition as at the commensement of lease term; excluding ordinary wear an tear.
- Ameliorative waste - changes that increase value.
NOTE: Absent a specific covenant in the lease, a T who fails to repair ordinary wear and tear commits no waste. A T has no duty to repair ordinary wear and tear unless covenanted to do so.
In regards to T’s duty to repair, what is the law of fixtures? What is considered a fixture?
When a tenant removes a fixture, she commits voluntary waste.
A fixture is a once movable chattel that, by virtue of its annexation to realty, objectively shows the intent to permanently improve the realty.
Common examples: Heating systems, custom storm windows, furnance, certain lighting installations.
T MUST NOT REMOVE, NO MATTER THAT SHE INSTALLED IT.
FIXTURES PASS WITH OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND.
How do you tell when a tenant installation qualifies as a fixture?
a. Express agreement controls/ is binding
b. In the absence of agreement, T may remove a chattel that she has installed so long as removal wont cause substantial harm to the premises.
* If removal will cause substantial damage, then in objective judgment T has shown the intent to install a fixture. The fixture stays put or renders T liable for voluntary waste. T’s subject judgment is irrelevant.
What is T’s duty to repair when T has expressly covenanted in the lease to maintain the property in good condition for the duration of the lease?
At common law, historically:
- T was liable for any loss to the property, including loss due to force of nature; T would be liable for restoration of premises or reconstruction.
Today, the majority view/VA Rule:
- T may end the lease when the premises are destroyed w/o T’s fault.
What are L’s options if T breaches his duty to pay rent while T is in possession?
The landlord’s only options are to evict through the courts or continue the relationship and sue for rent.
If the landlord moves to evict, she is nonetheless entitled rent from the tenant until the tenant, who is now a tenant at sufferance, vacates.
LANDLORD MUST NOT ENGAGE IN SELF-HELP, such as changing the locks, forcibly removing T, removing T’s possessions.
Self-help is flatly outlawed, and is punishable civily and criminally.
What are L’s options if T breaches his duty to pay rent but T is out of possession? For example, T wrongfully vacates with time left on a term of years lease…
Remember S I R:
i) Surrender:
- L could choose to treat T’s abandonment as an implicit offer of surrender which L accepts.
- What is surrender? T shows by words or actions that she wants to give up the lease.
- If the unexpired term is greater than one year, surrender must be in writing to meet the SoF; doesn’t matter that T did not receive notice, just mail to T’s last known address.
ii) Ignore the abandonment and hold T responsible for unpaid rent, just as if T was still there. This option is available only in a minority of states.
iii) Re-let the premises on the wrongdoer tenant’s behalf, and hold him or her liable for any deficiancy.
* Majority rule: L must at least try to re-let (mitigation of damages).
What are the landlord’s duties?
- Duty to deliver possession
- The implied covenant of quiet enjoyment
- The implied warranty of habitability