Land use Flashcards

1
Q

an easement is

A

an interest in the land of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

types of easements

A

affirmative
negative: gives holder the rt to prevent a landowner from doing something on his land. ex prevent someone from building a house that blocks light onto his land

easement appurtenant: owner of dominant estate holds the easement

easement in gross: results in a servient but not dominant estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SOF for an easement?

A

it’s an interest in land, so generally yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

creation of easement by implication: prior use

A

implied propr use:

  • severance of title to land held in common ownership
  • existing, apparent, continuous use when they’re held by the same person/ at the time of severence
  • parties intended to continue use after the division of the land bc it’s reasonably necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

quasi-easement

A

existing, apparent, continuous use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

creation of easement by implication: necessity:

A

severence of title to land held in common ownership

strict necessity for easement at the time of severence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

creation of easement by prescription

A
oh ace
open and notorious
hostile
actual
continuous
exclusive (can share w owner though)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

termination of easement by abandonment

A

proof of
intent to abandon
an affirmative act in furtherance of the intent to abandon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

termination of easement by estoppel

A

requires proof of
act or representation in respect to the easement
justifable reliance on that act or rep
damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

license

need a writing?
need consideration?
transferable?
expires when
revokable?
A

priv, usu to do something on someone else’s prop

no writing req
no consid req
not transferable unless the licensor intends
expires on death or conveyance

generally revokable at will, except
license coupled w an interest (A owns pers prop on the land of B; has a priv incidental to the pers prop to come onto the land and recover the prop)

executed license: substantial expenditure of funds in reliance on the promisor’s prom to allow the promisee to use the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

covenant that runs with the land

def

need a writing?

A

a covenant that runs with the land is a promise that attaches to the land. can be a benefit or a burden

need:
this night is practically suicide

touch and concern
notice (followed juris's recording stat) 
intent
privity
SOF writing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

types of privity

A

horizontal privity
rel bt original covenantor and covenantee

vertical privity
rel that exists bt an original party to a running covenant and the successor in interest to the orig party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

equtiable servitude

A

nonpossessory interest in land, where:

it’s a covenant running w the land but P seeks equitable relief
OR
it’s missing an element for a covenenat running w the land

don’t need privity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

owner of 2+ lots sells one. subsequent property owner’s deed doesn’t contain a restriction. seller wants to bind him to the restrictions found in seller’s own deed. files for an injunction forcing the restrix on the new owner

A

implied reciprocal servitude.

ok if:

  • general plan for the subdivision or whatever
  • owner had at least constructive notice of the restrix
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

right to lateral support:

natural conditions on O’s land cause neighboring land to sink. O liable?

O’s excavation causes the adjacent land to sink. O liable?

A

nope

SL if adjacent land would have collapsed in its natural state.
If adjacent land would not have collapsed in its natural state, O is liable for damages resulting from net

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

right to subjacent support:

liable for buildings…

A

existing when subjacent estate severed

liable for damage to subsequently erected buildings only if negligent

17
Q

riparian rights

A

rights in water enjoyed by an owner of land that abuts a navigable natural river/ stream/ lake. extends to the center of the body of water