land transfers Flashcards
what is a real estate broker, and what relationship do they have with their clients
aka a real estate agent, represents the interest of either a buyer or a seller in the land sale transaction
they have a fiduciary relationship with the clinet, meaning that they are acting in a posistion of trust with the client
what does the fiducary relathionship entail?
a duty of good fatih (acting in good faith for the interest of the clinet) and a duty of loyalty(acting only in the interest of the client without self dealing)
does the real estate broker have a fiduciary duty with the buyer?
no just the seller; the real estate broker does not have to adhere to the common law rule of good faith and loyalty with the buyer, unless otherwise stated in a contract
what is the purpose of the contract for sale/does it pass title?
IT DOES NOT PASS TITLE; rather it obligates the seller to provide title to the buyer at closing and it obligates the buyer to provide consideration for the tittle to the seller at closing; its an agreement for to transger the land in the future
can you transfer land without a contract or consideration?
yes, that would be considered a gift
what is earnest money and what happens if the buyer backs out/or actually buys the land?
usually a provision in the land sale contract; it represents a deposit on the property that the buyer places with an escrow agent;
if the buyer changes his mind and does not honor his contractual oblication to buy the proeprty, the seller gets the earnest money
if the buyer completes the purchase of the property, the seller gets the earnest money as part of the agreed upon purchase price
what does the closing part of the contract do?
its where both the transfer of the title and the transfer of the money occur; ie execution and delivery of the deed
what is the ‘time for performance’ part of the k
usually says ‘time is of the essense’ ; if a party does not meet any of the specifed deadlines, the k may be terminated
what is the inspection period?
its within the executory period and its when any disclosures should come out; the buyer usually hires an inspection company, and at this state renogtaiom is common/ if no agreement can be reached, the buyer can cancel the contrac without penalty (and get their earnest money back)
what is the executory period
its the period after youve entered the k, but before the closing; lasts about 1-2 months, the buyer is probably getting their financing together, doing inspections/
what is the risk of loss provision and what is the equitable conversion doctrine?
the equitable conversion doctrine is the common law; it says if the property were damaged during the executory period, the buyer would be responsble for that loss
the risk of loss provision places any risk of loss/damages during the exeutory period on the seller
what would happen if a risk of loss provsion were not in a contract?
under common law equitable conversion, if the house were destroyed, in a fire for example, the buyer would still have to buy
This risk of loss provision switches it to prevent the common law doctrine equitable conversion from kicking in
what is absolutely necessary for a contract to transfer real property?
stems from the SOF; must be in wrirting, must identify the parties
Describe the land
Reference the purchase price
State an intent for the seller to transfer title to the buyer at closing
what kind of writing requirement is needed for a valid contract?
any writing will do; and officla k written up by a lawyer, written down without laywer ect
what are the two exceptions to the SOF writing requirements for a contract that would allow a party to enforce an oral agreement wheich would otherwise fail because of the writig requirment?
part performance: an oral k for the sale of land may be enforced when there are acts of partial performance including payment of some of the purchase price, delivery of possion to the buyer, or improvements on the property by the buyer
equitable estopel – an oral k for the sale of land can be enforced when the buyer has reasonably relied on that oral k to his detriment; if failure to perform the k would relsult in unjust enrichment or unconscionable injury
what would a part performance fact patten look like
payment of some of the purchase price
delivery of possession to the buyer or
improvements on the property by the buyer
what is the caveat to the exceptioms to the SOF in terms of enforcing the sale
the oral k needs to be definite enough; a mere ageement to agree is not enough; it must contain all the necessary elements that a written k would have
Lemming v Mogan - alleged oral agreement to partner to purchase houses
Lemming and morgan entered into an oral agreement; lemming was to use his business connections and influence people to locate real estate, help morgan finance to purchase the property; lemming and morgan AGREED to temporarily put title to the property in Morgan’s name and morgan was to transfer one half of his interest in the property to lemming and spilt any proceeds earned. Long story short, morgan refused to transfer the one half interest in the properties and lemming sued for breach of k
Morgan moved for summary judgment because the claim is barred via the SOF
Lemming argues partial performance
Issue: is lemming’s partial performance of holding up his end of the deal enough to survive the strict SOF requirement for transfers of real property
Holding: no
Reasoning
For an oral contract to be enforced based on part performance, it must be CERTAIN AND DEFINITE in all ESSENTIAL particulars
even if a party performs actions towards a contractual end, if there is no actual oral contract in place, the court cannot enforce anything
Hickey v green - woman reneges on oral agreement to sell land
Facts: hickey and green had a discussion about buying a lot and orally agreed to a sale of 15k
Hickey wrote a check of 500; but hickey had left the payee line of the deposit check blank because of uncertainty about which green family member to pay it to
Green held the check, didn’t fill in the name and did not cash or endorse it
Relying of the arrangements with green, hickey advertised their house for sale and sold it so they could move onto the lot
However, green told hickey she no longer intended to sell her property to him but had decided to sell to another person
Hickey told green that he had already sold his house and offered her money for the lot but she refused and they went to court seeking specific performance
Issue: could the court enforce the oral agreement that should have been in writing via equitable estoppel?
Holding: yes
Reasoning
The hickeys relied on greens oral promise, moved rapidly to make their sale without any obtaining any memo of the terms of what appears to have been intended to be a quick cash sale of the lot
The hickeys were bound in their contract to sell their house because the check written to them satisfied the SOF and they cashed it,unlike the one they wrote to green where the payee line was blank and green did not cash it
in the hickey case, why did the check hickey write to green not pass SOF, but the one written to green by the buyer of his house did?
the one hickey wrote failed because he left the payee line blank, while the other check written to him for payment of his hold house was all the way filled out
if there is a problem with the title, what kind of fact pattern is it?
marketable title fact pattern
if there is a problem with the physical structure, what kind of fact pattern is it?
duty to disclose fact pattern
what do all land sale ks have, eitehr expliclty or implidedly?
covenant of marketable title aka covenant of merchantable title
what does the covenant of marketable title do
it obligates the seller to convey title that is reasonably free from doubt that there is better title to the property; Does Not have to be good/perfect but it must @ least be marketable – unless otherwise contracted for
is good/perfect title the same as marketable title?
no! that is a higher standard that is not required unless contracted for
what does the presence of substantial defect in title allow a buyer to do?
it allows them to terminate the contract for sale under the covenant of marketable title in the sales contract
can the covenant of marketable title be waived?
yes! the parties can contract to make the promise of title more or less stringent than marketable title
Ex: a buyer may require the seller to convey perfect title, a seller may promise only insurable title, which means a state of title that a title company would insure, or a seller may even disclaim any promise regarding the state of the title
what are three circumstances that defects would BREACH the covenant of marketable title
- A problem in the chain of title - a missing link in the history of title transfers
2.Undisclosed encumbrances - an undisclosed easement, covenant, or mortgage - Violation of zoning ordinances - noncompliance with local laws dictating building specifications or land use
which substantial defect in title is this?
Ex: the seller enters a k with the buyer for the sale of land. The seller can trace her title only back five years to the previous owner but not before then. A search at the county record office reveals that some other third party holds tilted to the property –
A problem in the chain of title - a missing link in the history of title transfers
so the seller is in violation of the covenant of marketable tile because she cant trace her title to the land back to the root of the title
which substantial defect in title is this?
Jon has granted his neighbor an easement to cross his property. Jon then enters into a k to sell his property to fran WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE EASEMENT. This
Undisclosed encumbrances - an undisclosed easement, covenant, or mortgage
This BREACHES the covenant of marketable title, and fran can rescind the contract.
which substantial defect in title is this?
P entered a K to sell his gas station with D. soon after, p discover that the gas station violated the zoning ordinance because the area was zoned RESIDENTIAL rather than commercial.
Violation of zoning ordinances - noncompliance with local laws dictating building specifications or land use
P can terminate the K as a breach of the covenant of marketable title
is title gained by AP marketable?
it can be; an adverse possessor must be able to show, by clear and convincing evidence , that he has gained title ‘that his title by adverse possession is not subject to any reasonable doubt’
what does perfect title require (given that it was contracted for?)
it requires not just marketabilty, but also that every link in the chain of title a seller presents the buyer at closing be of record
Lohmeyer v bower - contract made for sale of home that violates zoning ordinances;
Facts: p contracted to purchase property, but after execution of the agreement, it came to his attention that the house on the real estate had been placed there in VIOLATION of a zoning ordinance
The house on the lot was only one story high but the regulations required that all houses be two stories, it was situated too close to the border of a neighboring lot
He wanted to be released from the agreement,and said had he had known of the violation he would have never bought the property
Issue: is zoning violating a breach of marketable title
Holding: the VIOLATION of the zoning ordinance make such title doubtful and unmerchantable
Reasoning
A marketable title to real estate is one which is free from reasonable doubt, and a title is doubtful and unmarketable if it exposes the party holding it to the hazard of litigation
It is the presently existing violation of one of these restrictions that constitutes such encumbrance in and of itself , not the mere presence of the zoning ordinance
what is the common law approach to duty to disclose
caveat emptor
Buyer beware; the seller has no duty to disclose
minority of jurisdictions still follow this
what are the three exceptions to the common law approach of duty to disclose (buyer beware; seller has no duty to disclose)
- Seller must disclose if he has made an AFFIRMATIVE MISREPRESENTATION
- The seller must disclose if he has a FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP (or some sort of relationship of trust) with the buyer
- The seller must disclose if he has taken AFFIRMATIVE STEPS TO CONCEAL THE CONDITION
what happens if the seller disclosed the defects prior to the buyer entering the k
the buyer cant rescind because of the defects
what does it mean that the duty to disclose continues after passing the deed?
it means that if the seller fails to disclsoe and they are obligated to do so, the buyer can sell on the sale contract, NOT THE DEED