Land Transactions Review Flashcards
Who are the players in a land transaction?
Buyer
Seller
Escrow Agent
Title Insurers
Mortgagee [lends money to a borrower for the purpose of buying real estate]
[deed of trust definitely allows self-help without judicial intervention; most states with mortgagees allow that anyways]
Assignees from Mortgagee
Mortgage Backed Securities [secured by pools of these mortgages]
Brokers [Buyer broker + Seller Broker] each geta commission
Attorneys [In Commercial Real Estate, not typical in Residential]
An attorney representing both parties is more ideal
What is the procedure for land transaction?
1: Contract Formation
2: Closing later
Can a contract specify excusing conditions?
Yes, they may imply them as well.
When can the buyer walk away without having breached the contract and get their down payment back and be excused from the contract?
Mortgage Contingency,
Inspections,
Attorney Review,
Marketable title
What is a Mortgage contingency? What happens?
Buyer’s obligation to try and obtain a mortgage typically.
If Buyer doesn’t try to obtain in good faith buyer can be held in breach of K.
If buyer endeavors in good faith but just can’t that is typically an excusing condition
What are Inspection conditions/contingencies?
Buyer has the right to inspect the premises and walk away if there are some material defects.
Could renegotiate the price with the seller.
Material defect allows you to walk away.
What is Attorney review as an excusing condition?
Parties have the right to have their attorney look over the contract.
If dissatisfied, within 5 days usually, then can walk away from the contract. Attorney gets 5 days from when the contract is created to disaffirm.
Does the attorney need good-faith legal reasons to walk away?
Some cases say yes, others say no.
Attorney is instructed by client to say they are dissatisfied because client found a better deal elsewhere.
How can marketable title be used as an excusing condition?
Zoning, Convenants, Closing, Warranties of Title
Does the zoning have to be perfect for marketable title issues to not exist?
Zoning ordinances do not create marketable title problems ordinarily.
Exceptions:
1. if violations of the laws exist [Lohmeyer case] due to the risk of litigation rather than the presence of the ordinances in and of themselves.
- Where zoning regulations are imposed after the contract is entered into and where they would materially frustrate the buyer’s intended use of the property. Many courts will not enforce the contract.
- Seller knows of relevant zoning laws that would interfere with the buyer’s intended use of the property but informs the buyer such use would be permitted, the courts will refuse to enforce the K.
If the covenants are violated, could that affect marketable title and thus excusing conditions?
Yes, If the covenant says you can’t build a three story house and you have a three story house then that is a problem allowing the buyer to pull out.
What is the timing for marketable title excusing condition
Between contract formed and the closing
Where are warranties of title mentioned?
Could be the contract, usually the deed will specify some as well.
What if the K makes more extravagant promises than the deed does or less extravagant than deed does?
Merger doctrine says that deed’s warranties trump over the K warranties.
What are the different types of deeds?
General warranty deed, Special Warranty Deed, Quick Claim Deeds
What is a general warranty deed?
Broadest.
Assurance that I have good title, nothing else in t
he record that has cluttered the title either
What is a special warranty deed?
I the seller am warranting that I have not done anything to mess up the title. Not warranting that somebody else has not.
What is a quitclaim deed?
Most minimal.
I don’t know whether I own the land or not, insofar as I might conceivably have the title I’m giving the land to you.
I won’t challenge your title, but somebody else could
What is a Present Covenant?
Assurances.
If violated at all it would be immediately on the transfer of the land.
In other words:
It can only be violated at the time of the transfer of ownership of the property.
What are future covenants? Where are they contained?
If somebody makes a claim to title I will protect you against that.
Only violated when someone comes to challenge.
Sometimes contained in Deed, Assurance of Quiet Enjoyment.
What is the duty of quiet enjoyment?
If somebody were to come along 10 years later and try to kick you out and claim they are the owner of the land, I will defend your title of the land against theirs.
Future convenance.
What is the affect of Future vs. Present Covenance?
It affects the statute of limitations.
For Present: SOL starts running immediately upon the transfer. [You have 5 years from transfer].
Future: Only when someone comes in to disturb then there is a violation of the covenants
Does a real estate contract have to be in writing?
Yes, According to Statute of Frauds. MY LEGS. There are exceptions.
Writing that is signed by the party to be charged + has to contain essential terms [typically price + description of the property]
Exceptions: Part-Performance Doctrine, Promissory Estoppel, Duty to Disclose Defects
What is the Part-Performance Doctrine?
When the buyer has moved onto the land and has started to construct a structure on the land. [Universally accepted as Part-Performance]
What is Promissory Estoppel?
If you have a promise and a promisor could reasonably expect reliance + actual substantial reliance then maybe you have to live up to the promise even if there is no writing.
Not all courts have embraced because it is potentially too broad [ Some embrace and some don’t ]
Reliance is common, courts may not feel comfortable creating a judicial exception to a statutory rule that applies in most cases.
Is there a duty on the part of sellers to disclose material defects to the buyer? If yes, can the buyer get tort damages?
Traditional view: No, caveat emptor, except for fraud.
Modern View: Yes
For known, latent defects.
All states say it excuses the contract.
Can the buyer get tort damages? Some states say yes, some say no.
CA excuses the contract + may enable tort damages.
Can a misrepresentation by the Broker excuse the K?
If there is negligent or intentional misrepresentation it can excuse the K.
Not if it is an innocent misrepresentation.
What is risk of loss?
For example something bad happening to the property between time of K and closing.
Who bears the burden of risk of loss?
Traditional View: Risk is put on the buyer AKA they can’t get out of the contract.
Rationale: Equitable ownership idea
Modern View + Statute of Uniform Vendor/Vendee Act:
Risk is on the seller. Rationale: Seller is in possession of the land between the K and the closing. If anyone can do anything it’s the Seller.
What are the remedies for breach of K if the seller breaches?
Specific performance, maybe expectation/restitution/reliance
Why can the buyer receive specific performance?
B/c land is unique