L8 - The Influence Of Early Attachment On Childhood & Adult Relationships Flashcards
Internal working model
- Described as schema for what relationships should entail
- Comes from baby’s first attachment
-‘’operable’’ model of self and attachment partner, based on their joint attachment history – it is operable because it is used to predict the behaviour of other people in the future.
What is the affect of the first attachment
- form a mental representation of it - quality is crucial as acts as template for future
- Loving first attachment= functional relationships
- Bad first relationship= struggle to form relationships/ inappropriate behaviour
- Bowlby predicated there would be continuities between early attachment and later social emotional behaviour (continuity hypothesis)
Support for continuity if early attachment & later social/emotional behaviour
- numerous longitudinal studies - Prior & Glaser (2006) provide summary:
- Secure attachment is associated with positive outcomes such as less emotional dependence, ambition and interpersonal harmony
- Avoidant attachment is linked with aggressiveness, and generally negative effect
- Resistant attachment is associated with greater anxiety and withdrawn behaviour
Influence of attachment on childhood relationships studies
Sroufe et al. (2005)
Myron-Wilson & Smith (1998)
Sroufe et al. (2005)
- Minnesota child parent study
- found continuity between early attachment and later emotional/social behaviour
- Individuals who were classified as securely attached in infancy were highest rated for social competence later in childhood, were less isolated and more popular, and more empathetic
- This can be explained in terms of the internal working model because securely attached infants have higher expectations that others are friendly and trusting, and this would enable easier relationships with others
Myron-Wilson & Smith (1998)
- assessed attachment type and bullying involvement using standard questionnaires in 196 children aged 7 – 11 from London
- Securely attached children were unlikely to be involved in bullying
- Insecure-avoidant attached children were the most likely to be victims of bullying (act like they don’t care, leads to them being bullied)
- insecure-resistant attached children were the most likely to be bullies (helps them make friends & cling to them)
- This may be because insecure attached children did not have a strong internal working model due to the type of attachment they had with the primary caregiver
Evaluation of early attachment on childhood relationships (Strength)
- supporting research from both the Minnesota study and Myron-Wilson and Smith’s study.
- Minnesota study is longitudinal - follows same children throughout their life. So conclusions drawn from this study on the impact of the internal working model on childhood friendships is strong.
E.g. if a child has poor relationships with their friends, then this can be followed and traced back to find the cause of this? Was it due to a poor internal working model during the forming of their first attachment?
Evaluation of early attachment on childhood relationships (weakness)
- a problem with some research on the impact of early attachment on childhood friendships is that the methodology used is flawed
E.g. Myron-Wilson and Smith study, they used standard questionnaires to assess attachment type and school friendships – the questionnaire itself may be a victim of social desirability bias as many participants may pretend that they have a secure attachment – to portray themselves in a positive light whereas in reality they may not have had a secure attachment. - Also, many participants could have lied about the bullying either pretending to be victims or not being bullied.
- This means that we should be cautious in making judgements about the impact of early attachment on childhood friendships.
The influence of attachments on adult relationships – the role of the internal working model
Studied by Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Hazan & Shaver (1987) aim & hypothesis
- explore the possibility that attachment theory offers a perspective on adult romantic love and to create a framework for understanding love, loneliness and grief at different points in the life cycle
Predicted that: - correlation between adults’ attachment styles and the type of parenting they received
- Adults with different attachment styles will display different characteristic mental models (internal representations) of themselves and their major social- interaction partners
Hazan & Shaver (1987) procedure
- placed a ‘Love Quiz’ in an American small-town newspaper (Rocky Mountain News)
- The quiz asked questions about current attachment experiences and about attachment history to identify current and childhood attachment types.
- The questionnaire also asked about attitudes towards love – an assessment of the internal working model.
Hazan & Shaver (1987) samples
Sample 1 - analysed 620 responses, 205 from men and 415 from women between 14-82 years of age.
Of the sample, 91% were heterosexual, 42% were married, 28% were divorced or widowed, 9% were living in with their partner and 31% were dating (some fitted more than one category)
Sample 2 – 108 students (38 men and 70 women) who answered additional items focussing more on the ‘self’ side of the mental model (as opposed to their partner), as well as items measuring loneliness.
Findings (data)
Securely attached - 56% (both) - find easy getting close to others, don’t worry about getting close to someone/abandonment
Insecure-avoidant - 23% (sample 1), 25% (sample 2) - uncomfortable being close to others, feels nervous, hard to depend on others, feel uncomfortable being intimate
Insecure resistant- 19% (sample 1), 20% (sample 2) - reel tuant to get close as they want, worry that partner doesn’t love them, wants to merge completely with person - desire scares others
General findings
- securely attached described the most important love relationships they ever had as ‘happy, friendly and trusting’. These pps had longer lasting relationships and if they married were not likely to divorce.
- if securely attached they believed in lasting love, trusted others, and fount themselves as likeable
- insecure avoidant - more doubtful about existence/durability of love, said didn’t need love partners to be happy, also revealed jealousy & fear of inatimacy
- both insecure types vulnerable to loneliness - insecure-resistant (sample 2) - most vulnerable
Hazan & Shaver (1987) conclusion
- % of adults in diff attachment types match those of children in strange situation studies
- correlation between adults’ attachment style and their memories of parenting styles they received is similar to Ainsworth’s findings, where children’ attachment styles were correlated with the degree of sensitivity shown by mothers.
- Adults mental models differ according to attachment styles. Securely attached are more positive and optimistic about themselves and (potential) love partners, compared with either insecurely attached types.