L8 - Experimental design Flashcards
Objective of an experiment
To determine a causal link between two or more variables.
» stronger evidence than exploratory or descriptive designs because of the control made possible by causal research designs.
2 pathways of the experiment design
The “Between” or “Within” subjects approach.
‘Between’ subjects experiment design
Multiple samples - only one single condition
> Pros: Require less time.
> Cons: the need to ensure the comparability of results regarding the differences in demographic.
‘Within’ subjects experiment design
One sample - multiple single conditions
> Pros: Not require above examination of demographics consistency; Higher detection of effects as no possibility of extraneous subject variable; Ongoing record of subject’s behaviour over time
> Cons: Potential bias; Cannot get many subjects.
Three approaches for analyzing sample data that are based on the number of variables?
Univariate, Bivariate and Multivariate
Univariate data analysis
- The type of data in which analysis are made only based on one variable.
- Variables are examined individually and in isolation with no interactions examination.
Bivariate data analysis
- Analysis based on two variables per observation simultaneously.
- Cross tabulation technique enables exploration of relationships between 2 variables.
Multivariate data analysis
- Analysis based on three or more variables per observation.
- It is used for explanatory purposes.
- Advanced data analysis techniques like ANOVA, Regression modeling, and more.
ANOVA (analysis of variance)
Analyses and compares the variances of datasets to conclude whether the distribution of variance between different data sets in similar, demonstrating a relationship between data or not.
1-way ANOVA
1 dependent variable and only 1 factor regardless of the amount of conditions.
Ex: 1 factor = colour; 3 conditions = blue, yellow and red.
2-way ANOVA
1 dependent variable and 2 factors in it.
Ex: Colour = blue, yellow, red; Length = short, medium, long)
Social desirability bias
The participants’ tendency to describe themselves in favourable terms by adhering to socio-cultural sanctioned norms.
Motive of socially desirable responding
- To obtain approval by responding in a culturally appropriate and acceptable manner.
- To portray themselves in a more positive light when answering sensitive topics.
- To impress the questioner, an unwillingness to admit certain behaviour or attitudes, or an attempt to influence the outcome of a study.
The drivers of Social desirability bias (Fisher, 1998)
- This includes: Impression management, Self-deception, Level of involvement, Extrinsic benefit, Intrinsic benefit, Social norm influence.
- It depends on the particular sets of circumstances.
Indirect questioning (Fisher, 1998)
It is a projective technique that asks respondents to answer structured questions from the perspective of another person or group.
It assumes that respondents project their unconscious biases into ambiguous response situations and reveal their true feelings; or giving information about situations based on fact rather than opinion and so they respond behind “a facade of impersonality”.