L6-7: ESG and Corporate Valuation Flashcards
When talking about ESG, it can mean different things, like…
- ESG investing
- ESG performance
- ESG reporting
→ We can take different perspectives.
What are some approximate terms for ESG?
- Corporate social responsibility (CSR) - does not include governance
- Sustainability
- Stakeholder orientation
- Socially responsible investing (SRI)
What is the impact of ESG on corporate valuation?
Unclear!
Why do firms engage in Environmental and Social activities?
Various sources of pressure have arisen over time to encourage ESG:
- Money flowing into sustainable investment funds
- Shareholders sponsoring ESG-related proxy proposals
- Institutional investor activism (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street)
- Ratings, indices, and lists
- Employee activism
- Third-party activism and NGOs
What are stakeholders?
All constituents with a direct or indirect interest in the corporation, like: customers, suppliers, employees, creditors, trade unions, local communities, and local governments.
What are 7 examples of stakeholder interests?
- sustainability
- reduction in waste or pollution
- higher wages
- workplace equality
- diversity
- affordability and access to products
- being a responsible counterparty or local citizen
What stakeholder interests do we generally refer to?
The most directly relevant issues for each firm - materiality!
Because companies operate in different industries, stakeholder interests vary across corporations.
What does a materiality matrix look like?
Axis 1: impact on financial/company performance
Axis 2: Stakeholder importance.
Along a 45 degree line, the materiality increases
How much do firms invest in ES activities?
Corporate donations: proxy for ES activities. Have been increasing significantly for all channels.
- In the US in 2014, companies donated around $18 billion.
- Other reports provide similar estimates. Fortune Global firms spend around $20 billion a year on CSR activities.
More than 90% of the 250 largest companies in the world now produce annual CSR reports (these are not audited!), even though it implies a cost/investment.
What are the 8 different SRI investment styles?
- Engagement / active ownership
- Full integration
- Negative screening
- Positive screening
- Relative / best-in-class screening
- Overlay / portfolio tilt
- Thematic investment
- Risk factor / risk premium investing
What is engagement/active ownership SRI investment?
The use of shareholder power to influence corporate behavior through direct corporate engagement (communicating with senior management and/or boards), filing or co-filing shareholder proposals, and proxy voting that is directed by ESG guidelines.
What is full integration SRI investment?
Explicit inclusion of ESG factors into traditional financial analysis of individual stocks (e.g. as inputs into cash flow forecasts and/or cost-of-capital estimates).
What is negative screening SRI investment?
The exclusion of certain sectors, companies, or practices from a fund or portfolio on the basis of specific ESG criteria.
What is positive screening SRI investment?
The inclusion of certain sectors, companies, or practices in a fund or portfolio on the basis of specific minimum ESG criteria.
What is relative/best-in-class screening SRI investment?
The investment in sectors, companies, or projects selected for ESG performance relative to industry peers.
What is overlay/portfolio tilt SRI investment?
The use of certain investment strategies or products to change specific aggregate ESG characteristics of a fund or investment portfolio to a desired level (e.g. tilting an investment portfolio toward a desired carbon footprint).
What is thematic investment?
Investment in themes or assets specifically related to ESG factors, such as clean energy, green technology, or sustainable agriculture.
What is risk factor / risk premium investing?
The inclusion of ESG information in the analysis of systematic risks as, for example, in smart beta and factor investment strategies (similar to size, value, momentum, and growth strategies).
What is the legal case on Shareholder vs. Stakeholder view?
Early 1930’s: debate on the purpose of the corporation.
- Berle - Shareholder view: The management of a corporation should be held accountable only to shareholders for their actions (don’t internalize negative externalities).
- Dodd - Stakeholder view: corporations were accountable to both the society in which they operated and their shareholders.
→ Legally, managers should optimize shareholder value, since the cause-effect relationship of negative externalities in unclear/indirect.
Milton Friedman (1970): “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”. The debate is still ongoing.
What can we say about the ExxonMobil Oil Spill?
Easy to connect the cause and the consequences of the environmental risks. Sources say most expensive oil spill in history, and amounts could be quantified (like cleanup costs).
→ We can directly assess the responsibility of ExxonMobil.
But in most cases: not as clear which issues companies should internalize.
What is the Dodge vs. Ford Motor case (1919)?
Lawsuit by shareholders (derivative). Ford lowered price of cars, wanted to employ more, spread benefits to the greatest number of people possible, by reinvesting profits in company.
Court said he had to operate in the interest of shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers. This led to the shareholder supremacy doctrine, i.e. corporate directors must maximize shareholder value.
What is the Shlensky vs Wrigley case (1968)?
About installation of lights for night baseball. Owner of club did not want to, worried it would disturb surrounding neighbourhood. Other argued they were losing money by not playing at night, should be concerned with shareholders instead of neighbourhood.
Court dismissed: decisions should not be disturbed just because a policy chosen by the company may not be the wisest policy available (business judgment rule)
What is the shareholder supremacy doctrine?
Corporate directors must maximise shareholder value
What is the business judgment rule?
Managers’ decisions are protected