L5: Financial Globalisation and Capital Flows Flashcards
why do financial and trade globalisation go together even if financial globalization ≠ trade globalization?
countries that liberalise trade in goods also liberalise financial markets to foreign investment but different in some dimensions even if it happens simultaneously across countries
measure of financial globalisation
extent of the openness in cross-border financial transactions
financial globalisation tends to be something of developed countries and not developing countries
de jure financial openness measures
what are the restrictions to international capital movements?
institutional measures of countries led by policies which make it harder or easier for domestic residents to buy foreign assets and vice versa
variety of measures like tariffs in trade which countries can put in place to limit the extent of the trade of financial assets across borders (e.g. capital controls, taxes on foreign investments, etc.)
de facto financial openness measures
how much financial trade in assets?
measuring amount of trade and financial assets between countries
flows vs. stocks
flows as the value of assets traded for a given year
stocks as the value of assets held in a given year (cumulative flows)
measures of financial globalisation: stocks
international financial integration measure = (domestic assets held by foreigners + foreign assets held by domestic agents)/GDP
measures of financial globalisation: flows
inflows/GDP -> net purchases of domestic assets by foreign investors
outflows/GDP -> net purchase of foreign assets by domestic investors
flows as a less good measure since they are potentially volatile and not smooth
the first financial globalisation
world capital markets integrated at the end of the 19th century with European investors holding significant fraction of wealth abroad
capital outflows mostly to the “new world” in the form of portfolio investment which was driven by investment banks which became large (e.g. Barclays, Lloyds, etc.)
causes of the first financial globalisation
no clear shipping cost to transport financial assets but various barriers to trade that eventually fell
transportation and communication: information
- easier for people to go and look at potential investment opportunities
global UK banks
- development of the financial sector in the UK where they became much more global
Solow growth model
US as the new world vs. Europe as the old world (most advanced at the time)
much more capital at the end of the 19th century in the UK because they went through the first industrial revolution
Solow tells us returns to capital in the US must be high because there is little capital so return to capital must be high
so capital flows from capital-abundant countries (Europe) to capital-scarce ones (US)
European capital chased European labour and vice versa: both migrated to the new world where returns are high
what does the production function show?
yt = At(kt)^a
- the better the technology, the more you produce
- At as an efficiency parameter (TFP)
concave graphs which means returns to capital are decreasing
- when you increase capital, you increase output much more when you have less capital than when you have more capital
marginal productivity of capital (MPK)
additional unit of output per unit of capital (returns on capital)
derivative of the production function with respect to k
returns on capital fall as k (amount of capital) increases
what happened when the US and UK traded financial assets during the first financial globalisation? (with reference to MPK graph)
decreasing returns on aggregate for MPK which intersect on the graph with the world interest rate (horizontal line)
when UK and US trade, US has more capital to begin with
- starts with US under autarky where returns to capital are higher than in the UK since they have less capital
when trade opens, capital accumulates in the US so MPK in the US decreases
- returns are higher in the US so people want to go there and there are increasing amounts of capital employed in the US
- capital moves towards the US up until the point where returns are equalised (with the UK) and at that point, it is no longer profitable to send massive amounts of capital to the US
Washington consensus
collection of loosely articulated ideas at the beginning of the 1990s to modernise, reform, deregulate and open economies since countries would benefit from integrating financially with the rest of the world
suggested by the Solow model and potential benefits of financial globalisation which allow capital to move when returns are the highest
expected gains from financial integration
trade gains
- countries borrow since they have high capital returns and finance investments in return
- pay back later with the benefits from high returns of capital
intemporal trade gains
- capital flows from capital-rich to capital-poor countries
- more investment in capital-poor countries so they reach steady-state in Solow quicker
- positive effect on growth