L3 - Genetic Influences on Antisocial and Violent Behaviours Flashcards
Briefly describe the case of Jeffrey Landrigan
Jeffrey was adopted into a loving middle class professional family, but ended up in a life of crime. He was sentenced to death after committing his second murder. His father, Darrel Hill was locked up in the same prison, after also killing two people. Landrigan’s grandfather was also a career criminal having been shot to death by police, and Landrigan’s great grandfather was a notorious bootlegger (seller of illegal goods)
What are the 3 lines of evidence in behavioural genetics?
- adoption studies
- identical and fraternal twin studies
- identical twins separated at birth
What are the two lines of evidence in molecular genetics?
- XXY
- Candidate genes
What are MZ twins and how much genetic material do they share?
Monozygotic/Identical twins - share virtually 100% of their genes
What are DZ twins and how much genetic material do they share?
Dizygotic/fraternal twins - share about 50% of their genes
What percentage of the population are twins?
2%
What is the proportion of MZ and DZ twins?
DZ/Fraternal - 92%
MZ/Identical - 8%
The variance in antisocial behaviour between MZ and DZ twins can be divided into which elements?
- Genetic factors
- Shared environmental factors
- Non-shared environmental factors
When analysing the variance in ASB between MZ and DZ twins, how do we tell if genes influence the ASB?
If genes do influence ASB, the degree of similarity in ASB between twins that are MZ will be greater than that between twins that are DZ.
Name 3 shared environmental factors
Persoanlity of parents
SES of family
Number of books in the family
Name non shared environmental factors
Friends
School
Birth order (and parenting style for each)
Way the child acts, influencing parenting style
When analysing the variance in ASB between MZ and DZ twins, how do we tell if the environment influences the ASB?
There will be a greater degree of similarity in ASB between DZ twins than MZ twins.
In the twin study design where does error get included? What does this mean for the other factors?
In the non-shared environmental factors - therefore the genetic factors are always underestimated.
Why? If there is more variance assigned to the non-shared, just because it is unknown, there is less being assigned to genetic influence if/when it should be.
What is the range of heritability for ASB?
Ranges between .4 and .5
What is the percentage contribution of the shared environment to ASB?
Between 15 and 20%
What is the percentage contribution of the non-shared environment to ASB?
30%
What is the difference in heritability between reactive and proactive aggression?
Reactive - .39
Proactive - .50
What is the difference in heritability between aggressive and non-aggressive ASB?
.Aggressive - .65
Non-aggressive - .48
What is the difference in contribution of the shared environment between aggressive and non-aggressive ASB?
Shared influence on:
Aggressive - .50
Non-aggressive - .18
Heritability is strongest for which forms of ASB?
Early-onset, persists and occurs across different settings, and involves psychopathic tendencies (CU traits)
What did Viding, Frick and Plomin (2007) study about the heritability of CU traits at early ages?
Looked at 7 year olds’ CU traits. Selected extreme end of the sample to look at heritability of those CU traits. Twin sample included DZ and MZ twins.
What did Viding, Frick and Plomin (2007) find about the heritability of CU traits at early ages?
2/3rds of CU traits at 7 years old is under genetic influence.
How did Viding, Jones, Frick, Moffitt & Plomin, (2009) study the heritability for ASB between a high CU group and low CU group
Of the youths that were in the top 10% for ASB, two subgroups were created based on top 10% for CU traits and bottom 10% for CU traits.
Assessed for heritability of ASB at 7 years and 9 years.
What did Viding, Jones, Frick, Moffitt & Plomin, (2009) find about the heritability for ASB between a high CU group and low CU group
Heritability for ASB in the high CU group was .81 - ASB is mostly explained by genetic influence, for both age groups.
Genetic influence is much lower for group with ASB and low CU traits (.3), for both age groups
No shared influence for high CU group, but a third influence for low CU group, at 7.
So authors seem to have found that, within children with ASB, two different subtypes exist based on their level of callous-unemotional traits, and seem to have distinct/differing etiologies.