L14 - The Neo-Classical Model of Economic Growth Flashcards

1
Q

Why did economic growth dramatic change after the war?

A

In 1952 Moses Abramowitz surveying the theory of economic growth concluded that little progress had been made since the Classical period
This changed dramatically in the in post-war years, partly due to:
- the theoretical stimulus of Keynesian economics
- the western world embarked on a period of sustained growth
- economists increased knowledge of mathematics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some Key National Accounts details?

A
  • Total Output (Q) consists of consumption goods (C) and capital goods (I) so: Q = C + I
  • National Income (Y) earned from productive activity is either spent on consumption goods (C) or saved (S) so: Y = C + I
  • In equilibrium Y= Q and thus S = I
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Production Function?

A
  • A production function can be written as: Y=F(K, N) where Y is output, K is the stock of capital (machines) and N is the supply of labour. The production function defines the technology that translates inputs into output
  • Constant returns to scale is when if all inputs are doubled output doubles.
  • Generally: zY=F(zK, zN), where z can be any positive number. If K and N are both increased by 5% z =1.05 and Y also rises by 5%.
  • If z =1/N then the production function becomes: Y/N=F(K/N, 1) This says that output per worker increases as capital per worker increases, which can be written more easily as y=f(k)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Marginal Product of Capital?

A
  • The Neo-Classical model, like the Classical model before it, focuses on the role of capital – specifically a diminishing marginal product of capital.
  • This says that as more and more capital is employed for a given labour force, the marginal product of the capital (MPK) will eventually decline
  • In other words the production function is non-linear and becomes flatter as more of the variable input in added – as shown by the following diagram
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the Basic Neo-Classical Model of Economic Growth look like?

A
  • With Output per head y=Y/N on the y-axis and Capital per head k=K/N on the x-axis.
  • With a positive gradient curve of y=f(k)
  • the MPK given by slope of production function. Tangents get flatter as k rises showing declining MPK
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is Savings defined in the Neo-classical Growth model?

A
  • It is assumed that savings depends positively on income (Y) then S= sY where s is the average (and marginal) propensity to save and 0 < s < 1
    Dividing through by N gives the expression in per capita terms and replacing y with its equal f(k) gives:
  • S/N = s(Y/N) = sy = sf(k)
  • which says that savings per worker will be fixed proportion of output per worker
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is Investment defined in the Neo-classical Growth model?

A
  • Investment is defined as I = ∆K+dK – new investment (∆K) plus depreciation (dK).
  • To determine the equilibrium value of K/N, the question is how much investment is needed to keep K/N constant? There are 2 factors: the rate of depreciation, d; and the rate of growth of the labour, n
  • If capital depreciates at rate d per period then investment per head must be d x k to stop the K/N from falling
  • If labour grows at rate n per period, then an additional investment of n x k will be needed to keep K/N constant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Equilibrium Savings and Investment?

A
  • Hence (d+n)k is called the required investment to keep K/N constant
    The long-run equilibrium condition is:
  • Δk= i – (d+n)k = 0
  • In equilibrium S = I (and so s = i) which means for a constant K/N we have:
  • sf(k)= (d+n)k
  • This is the equilibrium growth relation where savings and investment are equal. It says that output, capital and labour all grow at rate n as illustrated below
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the Neo-Classical Growth model look like Including Saving and Investment?

A
  • With Output per head y=Y/N on the y-axis and Capital per head k=K/N on the x-axis.
  • With a positive gradient curve of y=f(k)
  • Another positive gradient curve of savings y=sf(k) but it is smaller than the curve y=f(k)
  • a straight diagonal line of Investment that maintains the capital labour ratio, (d+n)k
  • Equilibrium it at the point where y=sf(k) and (d+n)k intercept and the corresponding value for y for the function y=f(k) given the value of k of the equilibrium point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can the Neo-Classical Growth model including Saving and Investment be interpreted on a graph?

A
  • The point E is the steady-state level of output and capital per head. At levels of k to the left of k{1} k is rising; at points to the right of k{1}, k is falling.
    Although output per head is constant the economy’s total output,Y, will be growing at the same rate as the total population, n. This is an important conclusion for the Neo-classical model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can you calculate rates of change of y?

A

equilibrium in the Neo-classical model is a dynamic meaning it is a growth rate not a stationary point:
Y = Y/N –> Output per head
y(hat) = Y(hat)-N(hat)

  • where (hat) is percentage rate of change
  • in the diagram at point y, y(hat) is 0 therefore Y(hat)=N(hat)=n
  • where the rate of growth of output is the same as the rate of growth of the labour force
  • so at equilibrium y is growth at rate n
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can calculate the rate of change on k?

A

k=K/N –> capital stock per head
k(hat)=K(hat)-N(hat)
- where (hat) is percentage rate of change
- in the diagram k(hat)=0 therefore K(hat)=N(hat)=n
- where the rate of growth of capital stock is the same as the rate of growth of the labour force
- so at equilibrium k is growth at rate n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens when there is a rise in the saving rate?

A
  • This is captured on the chart by s rise in the sf(k) line, as s rises from s{1} to s{2}.
  • Gross investment will now exceed required investment and the capital stock will increase until k reaches k{2}. - While k is between k{1} and k{2} average labour productivity will be increasing, so the growth of Y will be exceeding that of N. Once equilibrium is reached Y/N is again constant
  • Thus savings alone cannot permanently raise the growth rate, because of the diminishing marginal product of capital
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happens to the Growth Rate of Labour during a increase in the Savings Rate?

A
  • growth rate has not permanently increased only temporarily
  • during the time between the original capital stock per head k{1} to the new capital stock per head k{2} there will be a jump in the growth rate because savings is higher than investment so as investment rises to meet it, but it will come back down once we reach k{2}
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the summary of the Neo-Classical Growth model including Saving and Investment?

A
  • The Neo-classical growth model says that economic growth is dependent on technical progress – which raises the productivity
  • A rise in the savings rate will only lead to a temporary rise in the growth rate as the K/N ratio rises to the new equilibrium – where production is more capital intensive. Once this level is reached the economy grows at rate n, as before
  • The model suggests convergence in Y/N over time with poor countries (or regions) growing faster than rich countries (or regions)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are two shocks that could affect the Neo-Classical growth Model?

A
  • savings shock

- technical process shock

17
Q

What is a Technical Progress Shock?

A
  • Technical progress is an improvement in knowledge that enables a higher output to be produced from existing resources
  • A technical improvement shifts up the whole production function (and hence also the savings function) to give a higher level of average labour productivity (Y/N)
  • If technology continues to improve the production function will continue to shift out and aggregate output will continue to grow over time
18
Q

What does a Technical Progress Shock look like on the Neo-Classical Growth model?

A
  • This has caused a change in the production function
  • A technical Progress Shock move y=f{1}(k) up to y=f{2}(k) which also increased the saving function from i=sf{1}(k) to i=sf{2}(k)
  • both having at equilibrium was at k{2} and to y{2}
  • the increase in Output head is much more than with a shock to savings
  • technical shock is said to be continuous so y with be rising continuously as well as k
19
Q

What is a Summary of the shocks that can occur in the Neo-Classical growth model?

A
  • The Neo-classical growth model says that economic growth is dependent on technical progress – which raises the productivity –> but become more capital intensive
  • A rise in the savings rate will only lead to a temporary rise in the growth rate as the K/N ratio rises to the new equilibrium – where production is more capital intensive. Once this level is reached the economy grows at rate n, as before
  • The model suggests convergence in Y/N over time with poor countries (or regions) growing faster than rich countries (or regions)
20
Q

What is the Framework for the Sources of Growth?

A

-The production function: Y=AF(K, N), where Y is output, A is technical progress, K is the capital stock and N the level of labour inputs.
- In terms of changes this can be written as:
ΔY = F(K, N)ΔA+F{K}ΔK+F{N}ΔN
-where F{K} and F{N} are the marginal product of capital (MPK) and the marginal product of labour (MPN) respectively
Divide through by Y: ΔY/Y = F(K, N)ΔA/Y+F{K}ΔK/Y+F{N}ΔN/Y
Multiply the first RHS term top and bottom by K and the second RHS term top and bottom by N, which gives:

ΔY/Y = ΔA/A+((F{K}xK)/Y)ΔK/K+(F{N}xN/Y)ΔN/N

21
Q

What do the terms in the framework for the sources of growth mean?

A
The term (F{K} x K) equals total capital income (income per unit times the number of units) and the term(F{K}xK)/Y equals capital share of total output
Similarly for labour. If labour is paid a real wage equal to its marginal product then total labour income is   (F{N} x N) and (F{N} x N) /Y equals labour share of total income 
-As there are only two terms in the production function then the shares of capital and labour income must sum to one. Let capital share be α and labour’s share be (1-α)
22
Q

What can the framework for the sources of growth be simplified to?

A

ΔY/Y = ΔA/A+αΔK/K+(1-α)ΔN/N

This says that the growth of the economy depends upon

  • the rate of technical progress
  • the rate of growth of the capital stock weighted by the share of capital in income and
  • the rate of growth of the labour force weighted by the share of labour in total income
23
Q

What is Total Factor Productivity?

A
  • Rewriting the equation in terms of ΔA/A we can redefine ΔA/A as total factor productivity (TFP). That is, all growth not accounted for by labour and capital, such as entrepreneurship, or the legal environment
  • ΔA/A = ΔY/Y-αΔK/K-(1-α)ΔN/N
24
Q

What is some Empirical Analysis of Factor Shares?

A
  • Factors shares have remained largely constant over a long period of time in both the UK and the US (and indeed in other developed countries) so from the data α = 0.3 and hence (1 - α ) = 0.7.
    A table can be drawn up showing the contributions to UK economic growth from Angus Maddison (1991)
25
Q

What are some comments that can be made about the table showing the contributions to UK economic growth from Angus Maddison (1991)?

A
  • The negative value of labour inputs reflects the shorter working hours in the post-war world
  • Madison’s calculations assume constant returns to scale, but economic growth is most likely characterised by increasing returns to scale
  • The TFP calculation is not possible to do if there are increasing returns to scale – so Madison may have underestimated the effect of TFP on growth