Kohlberg’s Theory Flashcards
1
Q
What is Kohlbergs’ theory based on?
A
- child’s understanding of gender become more sophisticated with age due to biological maturation - as brain matures so does thinking
- ages are approximate and reflect the fact the transition from stage to stage is gradual
2
Q
What is the Gender identity stage?
A
- at 2 years children can correctly identify themselves as a boy or a girl
- 3 years children can identify other people are boys-girls
- understanding of gender doesn’t stretch beyond sampling labelling, do not view gender as fixed
3
Q
What is the gender stability stage?
A
- at age 4 children realise they will always stay the same gender but cannot apply this logic to others
- confused by external changed in appearance and believe others can change gender
4
Q
What is the gender constancy stage?
A
- at age of 6 children recognises their and other people’s gender is constant
- no longer fooled by changes in outward appearance
- children now begin to seek out gender appropriate role models to identify with and imitate
- once a child has fully developed concept of gender they embark upon a search for evidence which confirms the concept (tendency towards gender stereotyping emerges)
5
Q
What research supports Kohlberg’s theory?
A
- supports the idea stereotyping does begin at age 6
- Damon told children about George who liked to play with dolls and asked them to comment
- 4 yr olds said it was fine, 6 yr olds though it was wrong
6
Q
What is one contradictory research?
A
- Bussey and Bandura found children as young as 4 reported ‘feeling good’ when playing with gender appropriate toys and ‘bad’ about the opposite’
7
Q
What was questioned particularly about the gender constancy stage?
A
- Martin suggested there may be different degrees of gender constancy
- initially children are oriented to the importance of gender (may develop before the age of 6)
- secondly children may be more responsive to gender norms, especially under conditions of conflict e.g choosing appropriate clothes
- constancy may be more gradual than Kohlberg thought