Knowledge Epistemology Flashcards

1
Q

The 3 types of knowledge

A

Acquaintance, Ability and Propositional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Acquaintance knowledge

A

“Knowing-of”, recognition, familiarity e.g. I know California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ability knowledge

A

“Knowing-how”, how to perform a skill e.g. I know how to speak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Propositional knowledge

A

“Knowing-that”, knowledge of the truth or falsehood of propositions e.g. I know my name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Necessary condition

A

Something which has to be true for something else to follow, but may not be enough on its own e.g. being a man is a necessary condition of being a bachelor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sufficient condition

A

Once achieved, it is enough for something else to follow e.g. being an unmarried man is a sufficient condition of being a bachelor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Jointly sufficiency and individual necessity

A

A collection of things can individually be necessary but not enough for something to follow, and together can be sufficient for that thing to follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tautology

A

Where you can swap a word with its definition in the same sentence and maintain the exact same meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Real essence

A

Something that has a real essence has a real definition, e.g. water, which will always be water molecularly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nominal essence

A

Something with nominal essence has a subjective definition, e.g. weeds, since what is called a weed is dependent on situational and cultural opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Zagzebski on knowledge

A

It has a nominal essence, and probably doesn’t have a real definition. We cannot be sure though, so we should continue to look for one until we are forced to stop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Zagzebski thinks a good definition should avoid being…

A

Circular, Obscure, Negative, Ad Hoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Circular definition

A

A definition that contains the term being defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Obscure definition

A

A definition that is more complicated or confusing than the term being defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negative definition

A

Defining a term by what it isn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ad Hoc definition

A

A definition tailored to counter specific problems rather than a general one

17
Q

Plato’s Tripartite Definition of Knowledge

A

That the conditions of Justified True Belief are individually necessary and jointly sufficient for knowledge

18
Q

K = JTB

A

Knowledge = Justified True Belief

19
Q

How to show a definition is bad

A

Give one counterexample e.g. point to something that is a bachelor but isn’t an unmarried man or something that is an unmarried man but isn’t a bachelor

20
Q

How to disprove Plato’s Definition of Knowledge

A

Either find that one or more of the conditions are not necessary for knowledge or find that the conditions together are not sufficient for knowledge

21
Q

Correspondence theory of truth

A

A belief is only true if what it claims to be the case is actually the case

22
Q

Coherence theory of truth

A

Truth stems from the web of beliefs held by a society to be true.

23
Q

What did Plato think about knowledge and belief

A

Knowledge is infallible and belief is fallible, so they must be two separate things. Knowledge entails going beyond mere belief.