King Lear critics: AO5 Flashcards
Paul Delany
MARXIST CRITICISM
Paul Delany offers a Marxist approach to King Lear in his essay ‘King Lear and the Decline of Feudalism’ . He suggests that the tragedy is that of a traditional feudal society (represented by Lear and his subjects, who put great store in their beliefs and ceremonies) being challenged by a more modern outlook that is rational and individualistic and has no respect for their values (represented by Edmund, Goneril and Regan). In a sense this social change represents progress, but it also entails the destruction of much that is valuable.
Samuel Coleridge on Kent
Complete works of Samuel Coleridge
“Kent is, perhaps, the nearest to perfect goodness in all Shakespeare’s character’s, and yet the most individualised” - he is loyal and selfless
“His passionate affection for and fidelity to Lear act on our feelings in Lear’s own favour: virtue itself seems to be in company with him”
Arnoid Kettle on Kent
“Kent has an ultimate failure to cope with the situation - he is unable to hole Lear within the bound of sanity”
Martha Burns on Goneril and Regan
“It is all too easy to dismiss Regan and Goneril as mere emblems of female evil… when women are just as obsessed with power as with men, they are called evil rather than formidable. Regan and Goneril are formidable.
George Orwell on social criticism
“(King Lear), contains a great deal of veiled social criticism. It is all uttered either by the Fool, by Edgar when he is pretending to be mad, or by Lear during his bouts of madness.”
Swinburne on pity and mercy in King Lear
‘Pity and mercy are words without meaning’
Arnold Kettle in general
“In king Lear Shakespeare reveals, from the very start, a society in turmoil”
“Lear is a world in which the old order is decadent and the new people unprincipled”
he sums up King Lear a conflict between “those who accept the old order (Lear, Gloucester, Kent, Albany)” and “the new people, the individualists (Goneril, Regan, Edmund, Cornwall)
Nahum Tate in general
In 1681 felt the ending was too gloomy and so devised a happier ending where Lear does not die and there is romance between Edgar and Cordelia.
Joseph Wharton in general
Objected to the Gloucester subplot as being unlikely and distracting and felt Gloucester’s blinding was too horrid to be exhibited on stage. He also found Goneril and Regan’s savagery too diabolical to be credited.
Samuel Johnson on Gloucester eyes
“The extrusion of Gloucester’s eyes… seems an act too horrid to be endured in dramatic exhibition, and such as must always compel the mind to relieve it’s distress by incredulity.”
D.J. Enright in general
“The principle characters are not those who act, but those who suffer”
LC Knights in general
“the play is a microcosm of the human race”
Harold Bloom on “unaccommodated man”
Believed the “decent from Monarch to ‘unaccommodated man’ thus conveys most potently man’s fragility, fallibility and fatality”
The phrase ‘unaccommodated man’ of which this was its first recorded use in the English language, is also evidence of Lear’s madness, for he speaks in prose of the unaccommodated man “the unaccommodated man like a bare, forked animal that thou art”, and therefore a contrast to his earlier speech in blank verse and iambic pentameter. Lear thus, is no longer “every inch a king”.
Cunningham in general
there is hope Gloucester will find “insight through blindness” and Lear “wisdom through madness in the play’s twinned key moral provocations.”
Elton on Cordelia’s death and Gloucester’s blindness
Elton says that Cordelia’s death and Gloucester’s blindness “are the actions of an upside-down providence in an apparently deranged universe”
William R Elton on the last act
“the last act shatters the foundations of faith itself”
Leo Tolstoy on the subject of the play
“the subject of the play is renunciation” (the rejecting of something)
Jan Kolt on the play in general
“King Lear is about the disintegration of the world”
J Harrison on “nothing will come of nothing”
“Lear replies “Nothing will come of nothing.” He is wrong - from this one word “nothing” begins the whole devastating tragedy”