Kin209 Midterm 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Causal claims

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Post-positivism

A

Based on the notion that there is a single reality, or a single objective truth that is waiting to be discovered through research.

Key defining features:
Determinism: causes determine effects (use of experimentation)
Reductionism: ideas can be reduced to small, discrete, and testable set (ie variables that comprise hypotheses and research questions)
Empirical observation and measurement: knowledge is based on careful observation and measurement
Theory testing: theories are tested corroborated, or refined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Determinism and causality defined

A

Determinism: the philosophical doctrine that assumes that every event has causes
-events are determined, or caused to happen; they are not ‘free’ in any other way
-injury prevention vs “accidents”
Causality: the principle that everything has a cause
-the relation of cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Causation

A

Effects can be the result of multiple causes

To claim causation:

1) covariation (correlation) between variables;
2) the relationship is not found to be the result of some third variable (isolation)
3) effects follow causes (temporal precedence)
4) the manipulation of a cause will result in the manipulation of an effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three criteria for establishing causation between Variable A and B

A
covariance (correlation): the study's show that as A changes, B changes (high levels correlate with high, vice versa)
temporal precedence (cause & effect): the study's method ensures that A comes first in time, before B
internal validity: the study's method ensures that there are no plausible alternative explanations for the change in B; A is the only thing that changed. 
(accounts for a third variable (C) or confounder that implies that manipulation of A will affect B)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Goals of science revisited

A

1) describe: using language to describe results that are scientifically a reflection of relationships should be avoided
- this is the way things are, cannot claim causation
2) explain-causation, how
3) predict-causation, why

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describing the type of claims

A
causal:
-affects
-leads to
-reduces
-has an effect on
-experimental study
Association claim:
-associated 
-related to
-linked to
-correlated
frequency claim
-counts: x number of, x percent of, x-y per day
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Frequency claims

A

Describe a particular rate or degree of a single variable
-how many, how often? (40% of Canadian adults are physically active)
Involve only ONE measured variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Association Claims (Morling)

A

Argue that one level of a variable is likely associated with a particular level of another variable
-involve at least two measured variables (unlike frequency claims that focus on one)
Variables that are associated are CORRELATED
-positive
-negative
-zero
No attempt to manipulate, control, or interfere with variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Correlation does NOT equal causation

A

Ice cream and shark attacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Making predictions based on associations (Morling)

A
  • some association claims are useful because they help us make predictions
  • the stronger the association between the two variables, the more accurate the prediction
  • both positive and negative associations can help us make predictions, but zero association cannot
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causal claims (Morling)

A

One of the variables is responsible for changing the other (cause and effect)
-one measured variable (DV)
-one manipulated variable (IV)
Typically takes the form of an experimental design
-experimental group, control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mediator (MacKinnon)

A

-A third variable that is intermediate in the causal chain relating X and Y
In a mediation model, the IV causes the mediator which then causes the DV
-X,Y,Z
-no relationship between x and y without

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moderator (MacKinnon)

A

A variable that changes the sign or strength of the effect of an IV on a DV

  • typically an interaction such that the effect of the IV on the DV depends on the level of the moderator variable
  • effect modifiers (gender)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mediators and moderators

A

mediating variable explains the relationship between two or more other variables
environment->behaviour->health
moderator enhances or modifies the relationship between two or more other variables
behaviour->Health
SES
-with whom will you conduct your intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Confounder

A

A variable that changes the relationship between an independent variable (IV) and dependant variable (DV) because it is related to both the IV and the DV

Though it explains/helps understand the relationship between X and Y because it is related to both, a confounder is not part of the causal mediation process
(smoking is related to cancer and alcoholism is related to both, but alcohol is not part of the causal chain between smoking and cancer)

17
Q

a couple more confounder

A

germs, bad smells, disease

18
Q

Internal and external validity

A
19
Q

validity buffet

A
Validity of quantitative research designs
-internal validity
-external validity
Validity of measures
-content validity
-statistical validity
20
Q

Internal validity

A
  • The ability to claim that any changes in an outcome (DV) is the result of a treatment or intervention (manipulation of IV), and not a result of other factors related to the sample, the measures, research techniques, or other potential threats
  • Can the outcome be attributed to only the intervention or could something else have caused it? (consider: confounding variables)
21
Q

Threats to internal validity

A
Threats to the experimental procedure:
-testing
-instrument accuracy
Threats to treatment or manipulation
-diffusion of treatment
-halo effect (researcher bias)
Threats to the participants:
-maturation
-history
-regression (to the mean)
-selection bias (volunteers)
-experimental drop-out
-placebo effect
-Hawthorne effect (act in favourable ways because they are being observed)
22
Q

Threats to experimental procedure

A

Testing: participants may become familiar with the test, which could influence future performance (VO2, pedometer)
Instrument accuracy: Measures must be valid and reliable, in good working order, and strive to be free of calibration error, inappropriate use, difference in collection technique, etc.

23
Q

Threats to treatment or manipulation

A

Diffusion of treatment: participants in one group talk about their experiences with participants in another group
Halo effect: when researchers have some expectation about the performance of a participant and are in a position to assess performance, their knowledge of experimental conditions could influence their judgement on outcomes or could influence the way they respond to participants (blinded vs double blinded)

24
Q

Threats related to the participants

A

Maturation: change may naturally happen to participants over time via growth, learning, or maturation
History: events other than the experimental treatment impact of the study (covid with school research)
Regression: extreme scores have a tendency to regress back toward the mean. Scores that naturally change in the direction of the mean (extreme highs and lows)

25
Q

Threats related to the participants

A

Selection bias: when random assignment is not used, there is the potential that groups will be biased on one or more characteristics. Who volunteers for a study may also introduce selection bias
Experimental drop out (mortality): people leaving a study for any reason. Researchers will compare those who dropped out with those who completed the study to see if there are any predictors
Placebo: may react in way they think they should act
Hawthorne: act in favourable ways because they are being watched

26
Q

Minimizing threats to internal validity

A

Identify potential threats to internal validity and design studies to minimize threats (eg consider procedures, treatment, or manipulation of variables, participant characteristics)

  • control group (maturation and history)
  • random assignment (selection bias)
  • validated measures
  • double-blind procedures (participant and researchers both don’t know)
  • identify potential confounding factors (literature reviews)
27
Q

External validity

A

How well the results generalize to, or represent, people or contexts besides those in the original study
-can you generalize the findings?
-this has to do with how the sample was chosen from the population
Example: You study the effect of social support on confidence and among olympic athletes
-would your results generalize to all athletes?

28
Q

External threats to validity

A

Selection x treatment interaction:
-when the unique characteristics of study participants make the treatments effective only for them, generalizability is limited only to very similar groups
-further research might be needed to generalize to other groups
Setting x treatment interaction:
-when studies new conducted in highly controlled environments, it is difficult to know if the same outcomes would be found in a real world setting
-studies with more “real world” procedures can be conducted to investigate this issue
History x treatment interaction:
-when considering timing of an intervention, it is possible that in the past or in the future, the same results might not be expected
-studies are replicated with new info and tech/equipment/procedures to see if findings are still supported (phones tracking steps)

29
Q

Internal/External diagram explanation

A

truth in the study- internal validity (super high may not reflect real world)
truth in real life- external validity