KHRUSHCHEV Flashcards
What was collective leadership?
Group of politicians took over after Stalin’s death, though the leadership was collective, meaning no one should stand out, there was a clear competition between Krushchev (First Party Secretary) and Malenkov (PM).
Who was Malenkov? Why might he have had an advantage?
MALENKOV – PRIME MINISTER
- was the most obvious successor
Who was Beria?
MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR AND HEAD OF THE SECRET POLICE (ARRESTED IN JUNE)
Who was Molotov?
MOLOTOV- FOREIGN MINISTER
What position did Khrushchev have? But what advantage did he have?
Krushchev (First Party Secretary) -> only member of the collective leadership that didn’t have a top job in gov, but was only one in the Secretariat and Presidium – secure power base to exploit.
State the 4 stages of Khrushchev’s establishment of power
REMOVAL OF BERIA
MELENKOV OUTMANEOUVERED
THE 20TH PARTY CONGESS
THE DEFEAT OF THE ANTI-PARTY GROUP
How was Beria removed? (4)
Khrushchev takes lead at the Presidum meeting on 26th June 1953 – Khrushchev and Malenkov accuse Beria of many crimes – arrested
His disgrace endorsed by Cent Com (with KH as dom figure) and was blamed for excesses of Stalinism. Beria labelled ‘an enemy of the state’ in Pavrada ad executed
How was Malenkov outmanoeuvred? (5)
- Kh had economic measures that were favourable to peasants (lower taxes etc) – bad harvest in 1953 Malenkov’s policies blamed. Kh saw himself as an ‘agricultural expert’ – launched Virgin Land schemes early 1954 to end grain shortage. Got more support from party as his policies gained momentum and given role of First Party Secretary in Sep
- Kh asserts supremacy of party bureaucracy over Secret police – the KGB as this point – and the council of ministers
- Malenkov was unstable, Kh made ties with heavy industry, planners and military men and could count on party support – e.g Molotov
- Malenkov resigns as PM in Feb 1955, Bulganin (approved by Kh, and not a threat) replaces him
When did Malenkov resign? Who replaced him?
Malenkov resigns as PM in Feb 1955, Bulganin (approved by Kh, and not a threat) replaces him
What was destalinisation?
Destalinisation was the process of undermining Stalin’s policies and improving the living standards of the Soviet people
What were the motives for destalinisation (3)
- liberate party officials from fear of repression so that the party could become an efficient mechanism
- to build support in all sectors of party and society that supported his ideas of reform and Leninist renewal - and undermine those who opposed
- address Stalin’s crimes to control radical debate
When was the 20th Party Congress? Why is it labelled a ‘key turning point’?
Feb 1956
- Khrushchev made his ‘secret speech’ denouncing Stalin and his policies
Key aspects of the ‘Secret Speech’
- attacked the ‘cult of personality’
- suggested that Stalin might have been implicated in the murder of Kirov
- role of the NKVD in purges - particularly focusing on Order 00447 - exaggerated numbers (5k shot - claimed 8k< shot)
- criticised the Leningrad affair and the Doctors’ Plot
- Ignored advice of the party and oncomings of war - ‘Stalin took no notice of these warnings’
Immediate impacts of the ‘Secret Speech’ (5)
- Hosking - ‘revealed a blood-stained torture chamber’
- read by 20mil people
- Party thrown into confusion - why had no one said anything sooner?
- Stalin labelled an ‘enemy of the people’
- Freeing of political prisoners - 7k rehabilitated within 3 years
Immediate consequences of the Secret Speech outside of the USSR (3)
- de-stabilising impact
- Polish strikes - change in gov
- Hungarian Uprising Oct 1956
What was the Hungarian Uprising? How was it dealt with?
- Full uprising Oct 1956 provoked by Secret Speech made them realise their mistreatment
- Soviet troops demanded them to leave - Hungarian PM denounces the Warsaw Pact and announces Hungarian neutrality
- Crushed uprising - 20k casualties
What/When was the Warsaw Pact? How did it impact Khrushchev?
Warsaw Pact - 1955 military alliance of eastern communist states in response to WG admission into NATO
The turbulence it caused (i.e Hungarian Uprising) along with the implications of the SS strengthened the position of those in the Presidium who were against de-stalinisation
What were the long-term consequences of the Secret Speech? (3)
Figes - ‘it was the beginning of the end’
- colleagues never forgave him for the chaos caused by the speech, nor did the soviet system ever truly recover
- readmission of Molotov 1984 highlights Party’s hostility to Kh
What was the ‘Anti-Party’ Group? How did they attack Khrushchev?
- Molotov, Malenkov and other opposers to Kh secret speech - unrest caused undermined credibility, unity and strength of the international communist movement
- Also used the fact that the Presidium were annoyed at the abolition of central economic ministries - lost power and Kh becoming too ‘assertive’
How did Khrushchev deal with the Anti-Party Group? (3)
- Kh assembled Cent Com quickly (base support) and Zhukov (head of army and KGB) - labelled the opponents as the ‘Anti-Party Group’ and accused them of factionalism
- Similar to Stalin but they were not purged - gave Kh the chance to highlight the break from Stalinist years
Impacts of the 22nd Party Congress 1961
Leningrad renamed Volgograd, his body removed from the Mausoleum
How can Khrushchev’s rise to power be compared to Stalin’s rise? (3)
- both were underestimated but used cunning tactics to outmanoeuvre rivals
- both exploited links to Party Secretariat to create a power base and have advantage in Central Committee and Presidium (Kh - often placed former colleges in key positions to build support among regional Party organisations - Moscow, Ukrainian Party Organisations)
- Ready to change/implement polices to undermine rivals - the starting of Virgin Land Schemes
What policies where implemented after the Secret Speech to change the Soviet System of government?
DEMOCRATISATION OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
DECENTRALISATION OF CONTROL
DEMOCRATISATION OF THE PARTY: (2)
- From 1954-1964 membership of the communist party increased to 11mil
- New Party Programme 1961 - communism complete and increase of real income by 250% by 1980
DECENTRALISATION OF CONTROL: (2)
- Transferred power from Soviet Cent gov to 15 republics of USSR
- 1957 Sovnarkhozy created - regional councils in charge of economic development (similar to Gosplan? caused opposition)
Why/When was Zhukov removed (3)? What impact did this have? (1)
- Had been essential in rise to power but started to become more assertive - introduced military reforms without consulting Party = threat
- Was dismissed and replaced with Malinovsky (pliable) - more freedom and action between 1957-60 but Kh became more authoritarian and arrogant
What were Khrushchev’s aims for the economy? (4)
- compete against America - particularly in Space Race
- expansion of chemical industry and produce more fertilisers for agriculture
- consumer goods and living standards
- focus on agriculture and high biological yields
When was the 7YP?
1959-65
What did the 7YP entail? (4)
- more investment in oil, natural gas
- investment in east Urals
- focus on space race
- used incentives rather than fear
Impacts of the 7YP (2)
- 1957 - Sputnik launched into space
- space race successful but draining on the economy - 1963-64 saw lowest growth rates since 5YPs