Key Terms Flashcards

Part Three (20 points; 5 points each) will consist of brief (about two- to three- sentence) identification of key terms. From a list of six terms on the exam, you will be asked to define four. You will provide a brief definition and indicate the significance of each item for the interpretation of the NT. These terms will be drawn from the list appended below. Example: Muratorian Canon. Named after the Italian librarian who discovered the text in 1740, this fragment may be one of the earliest

1
Q

Apocalypse

A

A literary work usually written in the first person. A genre of ancient Jewish and Jewish Christian writing. The genre uses a lot of symbolism to paint a picture of current reality and future salvation. The book of Revelation tells us that it is the “revelation of Jesus Christ”. Common themes in this type of writing is the battle between good and evil, and divine intervention where God ultimately wins. There are also themes of judgment day, and the resurrection of the dead. Basically, themes of eschatology and deliverance, and the battle of good and evil. You need to understand this in reading a document because you are expected to approach it a certain way.

A type of writing that has a prominence of angels and demons and supernatural as it relates to humans and the expectation of a final judgment and resurrection of the dead.

Characteristics:

  1. heavenly journeys
  2. historical sketches
  3. pseudonymity
  4. bizarre symbolic images
  5. violent repetitions and non-linear narratives
  6. triumphalist motivations
  7. exhortatory function

a) Apocalypse: “A genre of revelatory literature with a narrative framework, in which a revelation is mediated by an otherworldly being to a human recipient, disclosing a transcendent reality which is both temporal, insofar as it envisage eschatological salvation, and spatial, insofar as it involves another, supernatural world” (John J. Collins)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Apocalyptic

A

A worldview where there is a prominence of supernatural beings (angels and demons) and their influence on human affairs and the final judgment on nations and human beings.

In Paul’s writing, he believes that there are two ages; the present age, and the age to come. Paul believed that the second age, the age of the spirit, had been inaugurated by Jesus. The spirit of God has invaded the world. This is important to Paul because it means that the new creation is in the works. It is here. He says that circumcision and uncircumcision don’t matter, because the age of the spirit is here. The old categories of separating peoples is been obliterated. The world shattering power of the gospel is at stake when the circumcision group is requiring Gentiles to be cut. The new way to look at the world is spirit and flesh.

In Romans 8, Paul says that there is nothing that can keep us away from the love of Christ. No powers, no demons, nothing. This is a very apocalyptic was of thinking. So is Colossians 1:15-23.

Paul doesn’t tell use when these powers came to be, only that they exist and that Jesus has destroyed them on the cross.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“Catholic” Epistles

A

Catholic, or general, Epistles, are those whose who’s audience is the church in general. They lack a specific audience, or it’s general. They address problems that are happening within the church and provide more information than you would get besides Paul (in other words, Paul isn’t our only glimpse at the early church). The authorship of some of these letters is disputed.

Examples: 
1 and 2 Peter
Jude
1, 2,  and 3 John
James
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Christ-Hymn

A

In Colossians 1:15-23, we have a potential hymn. It talks about the supremacy of Christ in creation and reconciliation. Basically, there is very high Christology found in some of these hymns.

Other potential hymns:
Hebrews 1:14
Philippians 2:6-11
I Tim 3:16

Themes: incarnation, death, and resurrection. Gloryfication of Christ at the cross. Preeminence of Christ in creation, Jesus is above powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Collection for the Saints

A

In 1 Cor 16, Paul says, “Now concerning the collection for the saints: you should follow the directions I gave to the churches of Galatia. 2 On the first day of every week, each of you is to put aside and save whatever extra you earn, so that collections need not be taken when I come. 3 And when I arrive, I will send any whom you approve with letters to take your gift to Jerusalem”.

14 your present abundance and their need, so that their abundance may be for your need, in order that there may be a fair balance. 2 Corinthians

It looks like he was collecting money for the Jerusalem church.

i) Material Relief (2 Cor 8:14; Rom 15:26)

The people were suffering, and he wanted to help. This is not an insignificant project. Also suggests that he is trying to work or establish some sort of equality between the Gentiles and Jewish believers. Wants a fair redistribution between the churches.

ii) Unity and Koinōnia

It is an attempt to establish unity through giving. Serves to reestablish solidarity between the Gentiles mission of Paul, and what was happening with the leaders in the Jerusalem church. Acknowledges in Romans 15 that it might be rejected. In Acts, this offering is NEVER mentioned. The author of Luke-Acts is keenly aware of economic issues, but doesn’t mention in. So maybe it wasn’t accepted.

The collection is also an act of worship. And act of worship that is a thanksgiving to God (I or II Cor 9:6-15). He never gives them thanksgiving, he gives the thanks to God. Part of it is because he doesn’t want them to see themselves as Patrons to him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Corinthian Letters

A

We know from the letters, that Paul founded the church. We know of at least 4 letters to the church, and we only have 2 of them. If we had them, this would be the flow:

Letter A: He tells them in 1 Corinthians 5 that he had written to them to not associate with sexual idolaters.

Corinthians respond and send a delegation to Paul. This might be where they ask Paul about sexual relations between husband and wives, virgins, food to idols, spiritual gifts, and the collection for the saints.

1 Corinthians: Paul says that a delegation from Chloe’s people told them about their quarrels. This might be where he finds out about the guy sleeping with his stepmom. Paul answers their questions about things they’ve asked him about.

The Letter of Tears: This letter was written in response to the conflict that erupts after Paul makes a surprise visit to collect more money. Paul is not taking money for them because he doesn’t want them to think of themselves as their patron, but then he’s asking money for the church in Jerusalem. Some people in the church begin to talk smack about him and he rebukes them harshly. After this letter Titus tells Paul that the people have repented. Paul refers to this letter in 2 Cor 2:3-4

2 Corinthians: People questions Paul’s apostleship and he defends himself.

At the core of what happened is Paul's travel plans, and his collection for the saints. 
Plan A: Paul is in Ephesus. He plans to go to Corinth, then Macedonia, then Corinth. To visit them twice. 
Plan B: Paul says he was in Ephesus, he wanted to go to Corinth, Macedonia, then Corinth. Then to Jerusalem. But the plan changed. 
Plan C (actual travels): He was in Ephesus, went to Corinth, then Macedonia, where he writes 2 Corinthians. 

What does all this tell us? They were pissed that he was going to make two collections from the. People argue, and he rebukes them. Now there’s people talking trash about whether or not he’s an apostle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Docetism

A

Docetism comes from the Greek word “to seem”. The heretics wrote that Jesus only “seemed” to have a genuine body and to suffer and die. Ignatius said that Jesus was literally a “flesh bearers”, or sarkophorus. He argued that Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection were real events in history.

This is important to New Testament studies because John’s epistles, dated near the end of the first century, seem to be combating this false teaching.

Ignatius was a bishop of Antioch in Syria in the early second century who was martyred in Rome (ca. 110). He wrote against Docetism in his letters to the churches and to Polycarp.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Domitian

A

Domitian was the emperor (81-96) when John of Patmos wrote the Revelation. Domitian was known as the second Nero, he was a self-glorifying tyrant. He forced people to call him “Lord and God”. This would have really been offensive to Christians. Domitian actually welcomed the fact that people pay him divine honors, most emperors only expected after dearth. When the elders in Revelation 4:11 say, “You are worthy, our Lord and God”, it is a direct attack against the emperor. It is important to note that John sees the empire itself as a great harlot; it really didn’t matter to him who was on the throne.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Edict of Claudius

A

Suetonius tells us that Claudius was the Roman Emperor (41-54) who “expelled the Jews who were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus (Claudius 25.4). In Acts 18, Paul meets Priscilla and Aquila in Corinth because they had been kicked out of Rome by Claudius. What this tells us is that there had not yet been a split between Jews and Christians at that time. But, it does tell us that there were enough Christians in Rome to incite opposition by the Jews (at least according to Suetonius’ comment). The Gentile believers take over the church, the Jewish believers come back later, and now in Romans Paul is making the case as to why Gentile and Jewish believers are now the people of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gematria

A

A technique used by John in Revelation to name “Nero Cesar” as the name of the beast. Gematria is a technique in which the letters of the alphabet are given numerical values. The sum of the numerical values of the Greek work “beast” is 666. But 666 is also the “number of a person”. When “Nero Cesar” is spelled out in Hebrew, their sum is also 666.

When the Greek Nero Kaisar is transliterated into Hebrew, it becomes NRWNQSR, the numerical value of which is 666.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gnosticism

A

Focused on revealing the secret knowledge that would free believers from the realm of the material into the realm of spirit. They produced their own Christian scriptures, like the Gospel of Thomas. Again, the Christian community responded by making decisions on which scriptures were actually orthodox.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hellenistic Letters

A

This is the style that is used by Paul to write his letters. At a very basic level, it includes an 1) opening that includes the author and recipient and a greeting; 2) the body of the letter that consists of the reason for writing, the topic, and how readers should respond to it; 3) a letter closing with wishes of property and greetings from others in the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Household Codes

A

In the theology of 1 Timothy, Ephesians 5, and 1 Peter, household codes are essential for interpretation.

“Christians adopted the household codes of the Romans and baptized them. They were adapted to the life of the community. There was to be mutual submission. The household duty codes function as rhetorical devices for communicating particular responses in particular social settings and not as pieces of legislation for Christian existence in all times and places.” Achtemeier.

Paul us arguing for a God ordered reality and a theocentric vision (or, the management of God). He’s talking about household management, or a program of instruction or management for the church, or an arrangement. This is how we are to behave in the household of God. God’s ordering of reality, and of the church, is like a household. God is in charge of the entire household, or creation. The physical household now becomes the framework to understand the church.

It is an attempt to correct abusive speech from some wives in the congregation. There is a specific situation he’s addressing, he’s not trying to shut all women up. In all of these, the term being used is gyne (married woman). Those women are doing something that isn’t correct in the community, they are abusing power, or something is wrong.

Downs is saying the I Tim is the start of the household codes, and that the letter is a highly missional letter. He’s trying to make sure the community is acting in such a way that non-Christians would have no reason to say, “we don’t want to be like those Christians”. Downs is saying that this is not a discussion of “men and women”, but about “husbands and wives”. It is not theoretical. Some women owned slaves. But this is not a general discussion, this is specifically talking about roles in the house in antiquity.

There is a theological and missionary proscription here. When her modesty is embodied, she proffers a powerful social virtue to outsiders who think that Christians are deconstructing the Greco-Roman household. Women in this context are asked to dress modestly and listen. He’s not implying that women are more easily deceived, or created second, but that the Eve story is typological. And, the Genesis passage that is being followed in actually into 4:1-2, where childbearing is a symbol that she is restored to God. Eve’s story is a story of reconciliation to God in chapter 4. In Romans 5 it is Adam.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ignatius of Antioch

A

Ignatius was a bishop of Antioch in Syria in the early second century who was martyred in Rome (ca. 110). He wrote against a heresy called Docetism. He wrote these letters during his journey from Antioch to Rome.

Docetism comes from the Greek word “to seem”. The heretics wrote that Jesus only “seemed” to have a genuine body and to suffer and die. Ignatius said that Jesus was literally a “flesh bearers”, or sarkophorus. He argued that Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection were real events in history.

This is important to New Testament studies because John’s epistles, dated near the end of the first century, seem to be combating this false teaching.

Some people argue that it sounds like the I and II Timothy letters sound more like 2nd century Christianity. He had a very clear perspective of bishops, presbyters, and elders. He said that you should follow bishops like you follow Christ. Downs says that maybe he’s writing strongly about that because there were different views of what leadership would look like out there. Also, don’t forget that Phoebe was a deacon, so those roles did exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Imperial Cult

A

The practice of venerating the emperor began after Augustus’ death. People worshipped the “spirit guardian”, or the spirit of the emperor. Emperor worship was more common in the outside provinces, where local elites forced the people to worship the emperor as a sign of their allegiance to the Roman Empire. Worship of emperor was synonymous with a political allegiance to his reign. This was very common in Asia Minor where the churches in Revelation are located. The emperor was considered to be divine after death. The first few emperors refused to be worshipped. But, Nero, Caligula, and Domitian allowed it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“In Christ”

A

The term “In Christ” appears 73 times in Paul’s letter. It is so common that we don’t even notice it. This is the belief that something mystical happens between believers and Christ that goes beyond language.

Stage A: Christ has been sent by the Father.
Christ has died.

Stage B: Christ’s Resurrection and Ascension into the Eschatological Age

Paul is saying that as Christians, we share in this narrative. The story of Christ becomes the story of those who are joined with him. Through the Holy Spirit, we enter into this story, and that is important to Paul. My relationship with Christ creates a horizontal relationship with other believers. We don’t lose who we are completely, but we don’t become fully Christ either. We are new, but different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Judicial Model of Salvation

A

One of the Soteriological Models (model of salvation) in Romans 1-8. Especially in Romans 3:20-26.

Sin=human disobedience that brings a death penalty.
Jesus’ death=payment of the penalty sin.
Appropriation=acceptance of the payment through faith, apart from works of the law.

What’s the problem with this model? But this misses the cosmological implications of what Paul is saying. Paul has a view of sin as a power, it is not just something you do (like steal). It is a power. For Paul, humans are NEVER FREE. The question is are you a slave to Christ, or to sin? To death, or to righteousness?

Paul believed that Jesus had defeated both our choosing out of God, and the principalities and power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Justification

A

In Pauline theology, people have been saying that justification is at the core of what he is getting at. This has been the view from protestants since the Reformation. It is the belief that we have been made right with God, or justified, by our faith in Jesus.

State A. Works of the law lead to legalism, which at the end of the day is futile. There was atonement by Jesus’ death on the cross.

State B. Those of us who believe this are justified by our faith, and will be saved on the day of judgment as a result.

This is a fair reading of Roman 1-4, but that’s not all Paul is talking about. Justification seen through this lens is very Protestant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Junia

A

The name “Junia” is attested over 250 times in Latin inscriptions, not once does it refer to a man. This means that Junia is a woman’s name. Paul mentions 26 people in total, 18 men and 8 women. More than any other letter, Romans highlights the role of women in the church. Junia is an apostle, and a fellow worker. He only uses these words to refer to himself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Melchizedek

A

Melchizedek is mentioned only in Genesis 14, and one of the Psalms. He seems to have captured the imagination of Jewish writers at the time, and so is the author of Hebrew. He gives a Christological reinterpreting of Genesis 14. If you read Genesis 14, you don’t see that.

The point being made in the text is that Jesus is a high priest by the order of Melchizedek; that is, he is an eternal priest.

The Levitical Priesthood: Descendant from David, have to repeat sacrifices over and over, are polluted by sin and must sacrifice for themselves also, offer worship in the sanctuary.

Jesus the Great High Priest: Eternal, from the order of Melchizedek, performs a once and for all sacrifice, is without sin, and enters the true sanctuary in heaven.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Letter of Tears

A

Paul makes a surprise visit to Corinth to collect money for the church in Jerusalem. People had a negative reaction, because Paul was not taking money from them. He didn’t want them to think they were his patrons, because it might get in the way of freely preaching the gospel. So the issue of money was already present in the community. Paul writes them this letter when he is in Asia. In 2 Corinthians 2:2-4 Paul says that Titus told him they had repented. Basically, the issue of money is live in the community. Paul receives a message that there are other people questioning his apostleship. He refers to them as “super-apostles”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Literary Genre of Acts

A

According to Achtemeier, the book of Acts is a historical narrative. It provides a bridge between the Gospel, and what happens after Jesus’ death and resurrection. It gives us a continuity from the events in the Gospels, into the life of the church and to the ends of the earth (Rome). It also provides us an outline on which to place the events and people mentioned in the rest of the New Testament canon. Some people have argued that it cannot be history in the modern sense, but the second century writer, Lucian, told writers to give their audiences “what would interest and instruct them” (How to write History). In this sense, the book of Acts gives God’s people a look at her history and instructs them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Marcion

A

Marcion came to Rome with a different understanding of Christianity. He believed that the material world was evil, and that an evil God had created it. That god was ignorant of the evil God of love. He believed that at the cross the higher God of love saved believers from the evils of this lesser world. Since the Jewish scriptures pointed to this evil and vengeful God, Christ came to abolish the law and prophets, not to fulfill them. In response, the church included Jewish texts in the canon. Marcion relied on Paul, because Paul believed in the abolishment of the law, and on Luke, who was Pauline in his theology. He took out everything in Paul and Luke that talked well of the Jewish faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Montanists

A

Montanus believed that with his appearance the final stage of Christianity had dawned. He believed that the Holy Spirit came through him, and that the end of the world was near. The Christian community reacted by denying that he was the authority in the Holy Spirit, and that he was not at the level of Christ. They said that only the scriptures that came from the apostolic tradition were authoritative. Basically, Montanus was passing himself off almost like a new Messiah.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Mystery

A

Paul refers to the mystery in Colossians 1:24-29 and Ephesians 3:1-13. Paul is a prisoner of this mystery. It has to do with the fact that the Gentiles are now coheir in the Kingdom of God. Paul has been commissioned by Jesus to deliver this message to the Gentiles.

Ephesians: “that is, the Gentiles have become fellow heirs, members of the same body, and sharers in the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel.”

Colossians: “To them God chose to make known how great among the Gentiles are the riches of the glory of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory. It is he whom we proclaim, warning everyone and teaching everyone in all wisdom, so that we may present everyone mature in Christ. For this I toil and struggle with all the energy that he powerfully inspires within me.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Parousia

A

Parousia is an eschatological term that refers to the second coming of Christ. The New Testament refers to Jesus’ second coming in different ways: advent, epiphany, appearance, the day of the Lord, the day of Christ, or the last day. The Greek word “parousia” was used as early as the 3rd century BC to describe the visit of a king or dignitary to a city arranged in order to show his magnificence to the people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Paul’s Opponents in Galatia

A

Paul’s opponents in Galatia are Christians who believe that Jesus is the Messiah. They are not Jews. Paul calls them “false brothers” and the “circumcision faction”. There are a few things to think about here. Peter preached a law observant Gospel, the book of Matthew is evidence of this. But, Paul was called to the Gentiles. He was preaching a non-law observant Gospel. The Torah was an issue when preaching to Gentiles. The issue here is a law-observant Gospel to the Gentiles. Paul gets pissed. So what are the false believers trying to convince the Galatians of?

  1. They are calling the Gentiles to observe the law.
  2. They are Jewish-Christian evangelists.
  3. They stress circumcision.
  4. They point to Abraham as a first Jewish convert. In other words, he was circumcised after he made covenant with God. Paul responds by saying it was his faith that made him righteous. They are having a Jewish hermeneutical debate.

What are their core convictions?

  1. Jesus is the Messiah, whom God raised from the dead.
  2. Belief in Christ plus Torah observance.
  3. Paul is not a legitimate apostle.
  4. They claim the support of the OT and the Jerusalem church.
  5. Paul has wrongly abandon the law.
28
Q

Participationist Model of Salvation

A

One of the Soteriological Models (model of salvation) in Romans 1-8.

Sin=a cosmic power that enslaves people.
Jesus’ Death= defeats of the power of sin (Cristus Victor)
Appropriation=participating in Christ’s victory through baptism.

This is Paul’s concept of being “In Christ”.

There is a cosmological aspect to this model. It basically says that sin is a power that all human beings are under, that it existed before the law began, that it reigns in death, that it has power over the law and enslaves people.

In other words, sin isn’t just something you do or don’t do. It is a power. People are controlled by this cosmic power. People sin, yes, but they are also in control of some type of power. The world has been invaded by this power, and Jesus has defeated it on the cross. Wow. So yes, we do bad things and need to learn how to not be doing them. But, there’s also an enslaving power at work against us. And God has defeated this power. We also see this in 1 Cor 15:56, Gal 3:22, and Gal 2:17. Sin is an enslaving power or force.

Paul believed that Jesus had defeated both our choosing out of God, and the principalities and power.

29
Q

Patronage

A

The practice of gift giving, and relationships defined by giving in the ancient world. One could gain a lot of honor by becoming a patron. In fact, it was a sign of prestige for a household to have a teacher that was being paid. Paul wanted to avoid this with the Corinthians and refused to take money from them. Patrons could accumulate a lot of honor depending on how many clients they had. There are four different ways this could look.

(1) reciprocal exchange of goods and services
(2) personal relationship of some duration
(3) asymmetrical relationship: cleary defined.
(4) voluntary relationship: there was a legal relationship, but it was voluntary. They made a contract. The bigger deal you were, the more clients you had.

30
Q

Paul’s Conversion/Call

A

Paul’s calling came when he saw the risen Christ. Paul did not “convert” to Christianity, he always saw himself as a Jew. Seeing the risen Jesus convinced him that God had vindicated Jesus. Don’t forget, Paul believes that he is Jewish. He makes this very clear to us in Romans 9-11.

A note of the flow of Paul’s thought:

Augustine and Luther believed that a plight in life lead you to the cross, and that after you believed you had a wonderful life. People are troubled, and then Jesus becomes the solution. But this doesn’t work in the case of Paul.

Paul was perfectly happy observing the law. But his experience of the cross revealed a problem he didn’t know he had. He didn’t come to Christ because he felt guilty. The cross revealed the problem of trying to strive in works. In other words, the cross was the lens through which he discovered the problem. Before that he didn’t know he had one. The cross then becomes the thing that drives his mission.

31
Q

Philosophical Schools

A

In ancient times, there were different schools of philosophy. Stoics, Epicureans, Middle Platonists, Neopythagoreans. This becomes very important when talking about household codes, or rules. Meeks suggests that the different schools of philosophy all used the ordering of the household as a microcosm of a properly ordered city, empire, and universe. They were using imagery that was common to most people (the average person could understand household codes). There was a belief that some were meant to lead, and others were meant to follow. Everyone in the house had their place. Christian writers began to “borrow” this imagery to talk about interactions within the church body.

32
Q

Pistis Christou

A

Faith In Christ vs Faith of Christ. Both are god-initiated acts. One has to do with the faith we have in who Christ is and what he has done (anthropological), the other is a Christological statement about what Jesus has done. In other words, the faithfulness that Christ displayed in suffering on the cross and thereby reconciling us to God.

These two concepts are related. Our faith in Christ is present because of the faithfulness of Christ. Without Christ’s faithfulness there would be no faith in Christ.

God’s rectifying act, making things right, is found in the faith of Christ. Paul uses pistis Christou as an expression to talk about Christ’s atoning faithfulness on the cross. He died faithfully for human beings while looking faithfully at God. This is at the root of Paul’s theology. This points to God’s grace, that there was nothing humans did to initiate this reconciliation.

The other option in Galatians is observance of the law, or being Jewish. Paul was trying to communicate to the Galatians that they didn’t need to become Jewish. It is our faith in Christ, for what he has done, that rectifies our relationship with God. The faithfulness of Jesus saves us, if we have faith in it. Basically, pistes Christou is at the core of Paul’s understanding of justification. We rely on Jesus, not on anything else.

Implications: Just as Jesus was faithful in going to the cross, his followers must live cruciform lives in submission to God and service to each other.

33
Q

Pseudepigrapha

A

Pseudepigrapha studies the practice of writing a work in someone else’s name. There are works that are Pseudonymous, Anonymous (no author mentioned, like hebrews), and then there are forgeries that intentionally try to deceive its readers.

In New Testament studies, there are six of Paul’s letters that are pseudonymous: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus.

All of this has to do with how letters were written in ancient times. There was a spectrum in how letters were written.

Examples:

  1. author wrote it
  2. author dictated it to a scribe
  3. author and scribe wrote it
  4. composed by scribe and signed by author
  5. composed by someone else in implied author’s name

Early Christians rejected texts they didn’t believe were written by the people who claimed to write them. They chose texts of the canon that were in line with the apostolic tradition. But, there were A LOT of psedunymous texts in the ancient world.

34
Q

Psuedonymity

A

The practice of writing something in the name of someone else, usually someone more famous than you. In our world, this doesn’t make any sense. But in the ancient world, you gave credit to someone’s idea by writing in their name. Students or disciples of a teacher wrote things in his name after he died, there was honor in this practice.

There was a spectrum in how letters were written.

Author wrote it, author dictated it to a scribe, author and scribe wrote it, composed by scribe and signed by author, composed by someone else in implied author’s name.

Examples: 2nd and 3rd Isaiah in the OT. Greek philosophers also did this, they wrote in the name of the their teacher to give them honor.

NT Examples: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus. Don’t forget, apostolic tradition was important in getting heard. So if you wanted people to read your letter, or give it authority, you put someone else’s name on it.

There were letters that were rejected because they claimed one author but their content didn’t match up:

  • The Acts of Paul
  • The Gospel of Peter

Forgeries:
Paul’s letters to the Laodacians and Alexandrians (written by Marcion to further his heresy).

35
Q

Righteousness of God

A

The righteousness of God is an attribute of who God is, and which God gives to us. There is a close connection between God’s righteousness and his covenantal action. Paul imagines that believers are declared righteous now and will be saved because of this on the day of judgment. The righteousness of God is seen in Jesus. God was faithful to the covenant by sending Jesus to the cross for our faith. It’s the faith of God, in Jesus faith to the cross, and our faith in these things.

36
Q

Rule of Faith

A

The Rule of Faith is the common experience of the early church. It was something that was never written down until the council of Nicea, but even before then we know what the community believed and what they practiced. The Rule of Faith is the major criteria in deciding what books went into the canon. In other words, the content of the letters and the gospels gave them authority to be included in the canon.

This is the most important factor in deciding whether or not a resource was included in the canon of scripture. It had to do with content. Evidence of this is Serapion, who was asked if the Gospel of Peter had authority. Initially he said yes, but changed his mind when he read it because it didn’t fit what the community believed. Did the writing talk about normative status? Or, did it conform to what the community believed and was practicing? The interesting thing is that that “Rule of Faith” had never been written down. It was later written in the Nicean Creed. The community chose what it believed was legit, and shunned what the community believed wasn’t who they were. This is huge because the community gave scripture the authority. The common experience of the community brought the canon together.

37
Q

Scribes

A

Amanuensis. These were people who were paid to write letters or important documents. Scribes were often used to write letters in antiquity. Jeremiah had Baruch. Paul had Tertius (Romans). The use of scribes becomes really important when we talk about who wrote Paul’s letter. Was it Paul, or was it someone else? Did Paul dictate the letter, or did he commission it? I and II Peter are sometimes said to not have been written by Peter because there was no way a fisherman had the Greek skills to write them, but it IS possible that he dictated them to a scribe. Authorship becomes important when discussing scribes.

Examples:

  1. author wrote it
  2. author dictated it to a scribe
  3. author and scribe wrote it
  4. composed by scribe and signed by author
  5. composed by someone else in implied author’s name
38
Q

Sin/sin in Romans

A

You need to know the Judicial and Participationist Models of Salvation to answer this question.

In Romans, sin is described as transgression (3:20) and as power. On the one hand Jesus atoned for our sins, and we are made righteous by accepting the payment for our sin. On the other, Jesus has destroyed the cosmic power of sin at the cross. It’s both.

The story of Romans is that the death and resurrection of Jesus have brought about a new creation. Humanity is enslaved to a power called sin, and Jesus has destroyed that power. God is reclaiming the universe. We see this especially in chapter 8:37-39.

This might also be a good place to mention Colossians 1:15-23, where Paul says that Jesus is above all things. All things we created through him and for him. Basically, Jesus is the top dog and nothing can touch him. Paul has a very exalted view of Jesus.

In the Participationist Model of Salvation, sin is a cosmic power. There is a cosmological aspect to sin. It basically says that sin is a power that all human beings are under, that it existed before the law began, that it reigns in death, that it has power over the law and enslaves people.

In other words, sin isn’t just something you do or don’t do. It is a power. People are controlled by this cosmic power. People sin, yes, but they are also in control of some type of power. The world has been invaded by this power, and Jesus has defeated it on the cross. Wow. So yes, we do bad things and need to learn how to not be doing them. But, there’s also an enslaving power at work against us. And God has defeated this power. We also see this in 1 Cor 15:56, Gal 3:22, and Gal 2:17. Sin is an enslaving power or force.

*Paul believed that Jesus had defeated both our choosing out of God, and the principalities and power.

39
Q

Slavery in the Roman Empire

A

In his article, Meeks suggests that slavery in the Roman Empire was different than slavery in the United States. To use scripture to support slavery was to misunderstand the institution of slavery in antiquity.

  1. Roman slavery was not racially based.
  2. Many, if not most, slaves could look forward to receiving their freedom at a relatively early age.
  3. The system of patronal relationships between freed persons and the legal status they received had no counterpart in the American South.
40
Q

Super-apostles

A

Paul refers to these guys repeatedly in 2 Corinthians (11:7-12). Paul had visited the Corinthian church twice to ask for money for Jerusalem. But, he hadn’t taken money from them for their ministry. He wanted to avoid a patronage relationship with them that would impede the free preaching of the gospel. It would become a hindrance to them. It sounds like Paul put some people on blast in the Letter or Tears. He laters reconciles with the church and writes Romans from Corinth.

This is what they say about him:

(1) He is “two-faced” (10:1).
(2) He is operating “according to the flesh” (10:2).
(3) He is not of Christ (10:7).
(4) He boasts of his own authority (10:8).
(5) His letters are weighty but his presence is weak, and he is a poor speaker (10:10).
(6) He refused to take money form the Corinthians (11:7-11) but then he tried to swindle money (12:14-18).
(7) He lacks miracles and powerful signs of the Spirit (12:12).

41
Q

Supersessionism

A

The issues of supersessionism is relevant when studying the book of Hebrews. Hebrews says that Jesus is better than angels, Moses, and the old covenant. Basically, Jesus is better. If that is true, what happens with the Jews? What becomes of the OT convenient, the OT, and God’s people?

This is the belief that the New Covenant has superceeded the old covenant. Jews are no longer God’s people. The church has displaced Jews and God’s covenant people. Jews are inferior. This discussion has been happening for a looooooong time. But it’s really come up after WWII. But really, throughout generations this has been happening (Luther wrote “The Jews and their Lies”. People have argued that the Jews never got it right . . . but the book of Hebrews never says this.

The position of the Jews and Gentiles in relation Christianity is not the point of the book. The text says that Jesus is better than those things, but those things are never dogged on. It doesn’t say that God’s word through God’s son does away with God’s word through God’s prophets. But, even if that theology is there, it was written for Jewish Christians who were thinking about ditching the Christian faith and going back to Judaism. And, don’t forget Romans 9-11, that God might have plans for the Jews. And, this isn’t Christianity versus Judaism, this is a deeply Jewish Christian text making an argument in Hebrews 9 about Jeremiah 31. Christianity and Judaism hadn’t split yet. This is an internal Jewish conversation.

42
Q

Voluntary Associations

A

I think this is in reference to one of the four patronage systems set up in antiquity. Paul was trying to avoid a scenario where the Corinthians thought they were his patrons. Such a relationship would impact his ability to preach the gospel to them, so he avoided it it at all costs. There was a problem, however, in that he was collecting money for the church in Jerusalem. He refused their money for himself (highly offensive), and gave it to other people.

(4) voluntary relationship: there was a legal relationship, but it was voluntary. They made a contract. The bigger deal you were, the more clients you had.

43
Q

Works of the Law

A

pgs. 23-24. Works of the law is not work based salvation, it is observance of Torah. So the issue in Galatians is observance of Torah and being a Christian. Circumcision is but one observance of Torah. The circumcision group was arguing that the Gentiles had to observe Torah, that is, be Jewish and Christian, in order to be saved. This is a problem for Paul because he believed that the cross of Christ has done away with the old paradigms of looking at the world. The new paradigm is spirit and flesh, not Gentile and Jew. The circumcision group is therefor arguing for the old ways and robbing Jesus of his work on the cross.

“Works of the law” are therefore Jewish identity markers, and circumcision is one of them. Other options for works of the law are a) deeds done from a Jewish distortion of the law into legalism and b) any good deeds or goods works. For our interpretation, it has to do with Jewish identity markers.

44
Q

Horizons of Romans

A
  1. Individual Salvation. This is what Luther focused on. Basically, what does an individual need to do to be accepted by God. This is the Romans road to salvation. But, it is not at the core of Paul’s theology.
  2. The Relationship between Jews and Gentiles: Paul was interested in writing about why Israel had rejected its own messiah. If God is gracious, what about Isreal?
  3. God and the Cosmic Power. The story of Romans is that the death and resurrection of Jesus have brought about a new creation. Humanity is enslaved to a power called sin, and Jesus has destroyed that power. God is reclaiming the universe.
45
Q

Theological Differences between Deutero Pauline and the Pastorals

A

Colossians and Ephesians are Deutero Pauline
1 and 2 Timothy and Titus are Pastorals

Deutero Pauline texts have a high Christology (think Colossians and Ephesians, powers and principalities).

In the Pastorals, they lack the great themes of justification and Israel. Faith has become synonymous with the Rule of Faith or is ranked as a virtue. There are no salvation themes.

46
Q

Ecclesiastical Organization between Deutero Pauline and the Pastorals

A

In Colossians, cosmic christology means cosmic ecclesiology. In Ephesians, there is little focus on church order.

Pastorals: overseers, deacons, and elders. Dismissive view of women in ministry?

47
Q

Arguments of Pseudonymity in the Pastoral Epistles

A

Many people don’t believe that Paul wrote the Pastoral Epistles. Dr. Downs disagrees.

  1. Vocabulary and Style: This is the primary reason people don’t think he wrote them. Harrison’s The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles. The language of the pastoral letters has more in common with 2nd century Greek than 1st century greek. In pastoral “pistous” is “the Faith”, or Christianity. Down says we don’t have a large enough sample size to know Paul’s real voice.
  2. Theological Differences: They lack eschatology. Collosians 3:1 “If you have been raised with Christ”, Ephesians 2 “You have been saved, and raised us up with him”. Realized eschatology. In other words, it’s already happened. But in the PE, eschatology is in the future (But he does this again in II Thes). There is no mention of justification by faith. No mention of “the body of Christ”, or the concept of being “in Christ” or a relationship with Christ. Downs is arguing is that individual arguments about differences in theology fall apart because the theology being argued only comes up 1-2 times in the others letter, so if it’s missing in the PEs it doesn’t matter because they’re also missing from other letters.
  3. Chronological Difficulties: In Titus1:5 he says that he leaves Titus in Crete. But there’s no indication anywhere else to this. But maybe we don’t have all the details of where he was.
  4. Ecclesiastical Organization: People say that when Paul started the churches, they were loosely organized. But, we see bishops and deacons in Philippians, and we all agree that he write them. Those roles existed in the letters we know he wrote.
  5. Role of Women in the Church: This can be covered by talking about Household Codes.
48
Q

Wealth in the book of James

A

45% of the book talks about money.

James condemns the rich. Don’t forget that you can’t think of just money, but also power, esteem, and status. James makes us ask is it even possible to be a Christian and to be rich. His condemnation of the rich is very similar to the Old Testament prophets. This includes believers in the church.

Other things talk about: the impermanence of wealth, the concern for the needy, impartiality within the community of faith, wealth as a temptation to idolatry, and harsh judgment upon economic injustice.

49
Q

Differences between Old Testament and New Testament priesthood

A

Old Testament: descendent from David, repeat sacrifices over and over, polluted by sin and need to offer sacrifices for themselves, offer worship in the sanctuary that is a shadow of heavenly one.

New Testament: eternal from the order of Melchizedek, performs a once and for all sacrifice, without sin, enters the true heavenly sanctuary.

50
Q

Setting of Hebrews

A

Second-generation believers before the destruction of the temple. Experience of persecution but not martyrdom. In danger of falling away because of intense persecution.

51
Q

Christology of Hebrews

A

This is a huge theme in the book of Hebrews. Jesus is the best.

  1. Jesus as the son is in contrast to prophets, angels and Moses.
  2. Jesus as the pioneer of our faith. Brother and apostle, source of salvation, forerunner on our behalf, and the great Shepherd of the sheep.
  3. Jesus is the high priest. He is like us but not like us, and his work is accomplished once in for all.
52
Q

Kreitton

A

“Better than” in Hebrews, mentioned 13x.

Profits, angels, Moses, Joshua, Jewish priesthood, superior covenant, superior tabernacle, superior sacrifice.

53
Q

Faith in Hebrews

A

Faithfulness, steadfastness, and pressing on. This is what’s needed for God’s pilgrim people.

54
Q

Atonement in Hebrews

A

Atonement in Hebrews happens not on the cross, but when Jesus offers his blood in the heavenly realms. His atoning work happened in the presence of God in the heavenly realms. It’s not only his death on the cross. The logic is this → the cross leads to the resurrection, to exaltation, and then a to his presentation of his own blood to god. In this way, the resurrection is very important to Hebrews. If he isn’t resurrected, he’s a priest like all other priests. The resurrected life matters to God.

55
Q

Meritorious and Redemptive Almsgiving

A

1 Peter 4:7-11

Modern day readers of 1 Peter 4 agree that it is God’s love for humans that covers a multitude of sins. So does 1 Clement.

This is the section on redemptive alms giving. Clement of Alexandria and 2 Clement both agree that human love atones for the sins of the one who sinned. There is a notion here that giving to the needy redeems (cancels or cleans) ones sins. This is strangely familiar to indulgences in the Reformation.

There is also Meritorious Almsgiving, the notion that some merit or reward is accrued for the donor who gives alms to the needs of others.

56
Q

Christian Identity in 1 Peter

A

New Birth and “Conversion”

(a) Conversion as Event and Process
(b) Conversion as Biographical Reconstruction
(c) Conversion as a Social Act/Community Incorporation
(d) Conversion and “the Word of God”

57
Q

Images for the People of God in 1 Peter

A

(1) Exiles (parepidēmoi) and Aliens (paroikoi) (1:1; 2:11)
(2) Royal Priesthood (2:5, 9-10)
(3) Elect (1:1, 16; 3:9; 5:10)
(4) “Daughters of Sarah” (3:6)
(5) Flock of God (5:2)
(a) Jesus as Chief Shepherd/Guardian (5:4; 2:25)
(b) Elders (presbuteroi) as Shepherds (5:1, 5)
(6) Household of God (2:4-10; 4:17)

58
Q

History of Interpretation of Revelation

A
  1. Preterist. events explained in the context of the 1st century. Reads it primarily in literary and historical context. You look at it from John’s audience’s point of view (Gonzalez talks about this). It has something to say about the Roman Empire. But, this mutes the theological implications that are true for all times.
  2. Historicist. Revelation = a symbolic account of the history of the church from the 1st century until the present (i.e., at the time of the interpreter). A lot of the Reformers saw the Pope as the whore of Babylon. And the Pope saw Luther as the whore of Babylon. Basically, the whore becomes anyone who you don’t like. Your enemy. This focus has been mostly in Western theology. But this reading denies any significance of meaning for anyone in the first century. If it’s for us, what about them? This reading makes Revelation our text, not theirs. It denies the early church a reading of the text.
  3. Futurist. 4:1-22:5 depict future events that will precede the eschatological age. Very literal reading of the text. It is seen as prophecy. Maybe some of it isn’t totally literally, like maybe there’s not going to be 4 men on horses. It focuses a lot on chapter 20.
59
Q

Preterist

A

Revelation events explained in the context of the 1st century. Reads it primarily in literary and historical context. You look at it from John’s audience’s point of view (Gonzalez talks about this). It has something to say about the Roman Empire. But, this mutes the theological implications that are true for all times.

60
Q

Historicist

A

Revelation = a symbolic account of the history of the church from the 1st century until the present (i.e., at the time of the interpreter). A lot of the Reformers saw the Pope as the whore of Babylon. And the Pope saw Luther as the whore of Babylon. Basically, the whore becomes anyone who you don’t like. Your enemy. This focus has been mostly in Western theology. But this reading denies any significance of meaning for anyone in the first century. If it’s for us, what about them? This reading makes Revelation our text, not theirs. It denies the early church a reading of the text.

61
Q

Futurist

A

Revelation depicts future events that will precede the eschatological age. Very literal reading of the text. It is seen as prophecy. Maybe some of it isn’t totally literally, like maybe there’s not going to be 4 men on horses. It focuses a lot on chapter 20.

62
Q

Futurist Readings of Revelation

A

(1) Early Millennial Readings (Justin Martyr, Irenaeus). Around 165. He thinks there will be a literal 1000-year reign. But he says that some don’t believe that, and they are saved. From the very beginning people were interpreting this symbolically. Irenaeus also talked about 1000-year reign. He was pushing against Gnosticism, mostly because of the embodied presence of Jesus (that G. didn’t care). Pre-millenialist. Christ would come before the 1000-year reign. Post Millenialism-Jesus would will come back after 1000 years of peace. This was common because there were a lot of missionaries in the 1700s and 1800s that thought what they were doing was setting up the millennial age (the Civil War put an end to this thinking).
(2) Dispensationalism: Downs has a bias against this. They believe in the rapture (and only them). Origins in John Nelson Darby. A young woman had a vision that there would be two returns of Jesus. This is how he developed the theology. There are different dispensations of time. Assumptions: because God is faithful, there will be a literal fulfillment of all of prophecies to Israel. Biblical prophecies only apply to Israel. They rejected the Messiah, so God developed plan B, the church. Or, the great parenthesis. There are prophecies that are for Israel, not the church, therefore the church will be raptured so that God will fulfill his promises to Israel.
(3) Symbolic (Idealist): Rev = a symbolic account of the conflict between good and evil. It provides a symbolic portrayal of evil and good in our world. Allegory people, like Origin and Augustine, loved this view. Augustine read the binding of Satan as Jesus’ life, that he was defeated. They didn’t believe 1000 years was literal, and they are known as a-millenialist. The millemial is now, in the life of the church.

63
Q

Threats to the Church in Revelation

A

There is no single problem to the churches, it’s at least three things that we are seeing.

(a) False teaching: Nocolatians in 2, idolatry. In 3:14-22
(b) Persecution: most people only focus here. In other wrods, that apocalyptic writings are found during persecution. But, we know from Revelation that they were suffering with complacency and false teaching.
(c) Complacency: 3:14-22. They are complacent. He’s telling them to open the door to the needy.

64
Q

Literary Genre of Revelation

A

It is an apocalyptic prophecy in the form of a letter that is circulated. It is a Revelation of Jesus Christ, or from Jesus Christ? Both.

65
Q

Characteristics of Literary Apocalypses

A

i) Heavenly Journeys
ii) Historical Sketches
iii) Pseudonymity (Daniel, Apocalypse of Peter, 1 Enoch)
iv) Bizarre Symbolic Visions
v) Violent Repetitions and Non-Linear Narratives
vi) Triumphalist Motivations: God will prevail in the end.
vii) Exhortatory Function

66
Q

Babylon Appendix in Revelation

A

17:1-19:10: This part of the text, especially 18, speaks directly into the way the modern west is materialistic. And the way we oppress the rest of the world. John has laid for us a hermeneutical trap. We are guilty.

John is talking about Roman military and economic power, and the Emperor and the emperor cult.

67
Q

Themes of Revelation

A

i) Vision Cycle One: The symbolism is vague, but there is a situation of persecution.
ii) Vision Cycle Two: The symbolism becomes clearer, and Rome is the persecutor.

iv) Primary Theme: Endure and witness for the lamb is to be worshipped! Who is in charge? Who deserves allegiance and worship? In Revelation 21, the victory is painted beautifully. It was a message to the church, but it gives us a glimpse of what is, and is to come. Who is worthy of our praise? The last chapter of Revelation tells us clearly that it is Christ, not Cesar.