Key Notes P2, Cross Cultural Variations Onwards Flashcards
Meta analysis of cross cultural variation
Van ijzendoorm and Krooneburg of 32 strange situation studies
Found intra cultural differences were 1.5x greater than inter cultural
Secure most common followed by insecure avoidant (except Israel and Japan)
Support view there is a bio basis
High levels of insecure avoidant in Germany- value I dependence
Explanations for variation within cultures
Effects of mass media- spread ideas about parenting
Socio economic status
Issues of meta analysis
Drew conclusions about cultural differences, compared countries not cultures, subcultures
Study of urban Tokyo rather than rural
Difficulty in applying principles to collectivist cultures
Continuity hypothesis- doesn’t have the same meaning: Bowlby+ Ainsworth define secure attachment as independence- Japan competence= emotional exploration and dependence
‘Imposed etic’ researches use techniques that are only relevant to one culture
Cross cultural variation in att
Difference in children rearing practices
Individualist versus collectivist
Takahashi
Whether strange situation is a valid procedure when assessing att types of children from other cultures.
60 middle class Japanese infants aged 1 year and mothers
68% sec att, 32% insecure res and 0% avoidant
90% infants removed as response too extreme
Sample could be criticised, poss psych harm as study wasn’t stopped only observation
Critical period of Bowlby
Extent effected by age of 2 and a half, whether substitute att figure is provided
Now suggested more a sensitive period of up to 5yrs
LT consequences of emotional maladjustment and even mental health issues ie depression, impact intellectual development
Short term separation PDD model
Protest- immediate reaction, crying/ screaming etc, outward expression of emotion
Despair- more apathetic, anger felt more inwardly eg sucking thumb
Detachment- responds warily to people, signs of anger and rejection of caregiver
Robertson and Robertson ‘John’ spent 9 days in residential nursery, progressively more withdrawn and clung to teddy, tried to get away from mother on her arrival, showed LT neg effects
Evaluation of the effects of short term separation
- Robertson and Robertson- prevent psycho harm by bringing children into own home
- correlational research not causal
- individual differences
+ real world applications
Bowlbys 44 juvenile thieves
Interviewed 88 children, ages 5-16, 44 were thieves and others non delinquent children, all emotionally maladjusted in some way
16 of 44 thieves were Identified as affection less psychopaths
86% of those identified had experiences early and prolonged separations from mothers
4% of non thieves had experienced separations
Criticisms of the effects of LT separations
Data collection retrospective and reliant on memory
Some only experiences separation at short periods
Results are correlational, Rutter found delinquency most common when boys had experienced family discord
Evaluation of studies into privation
Inconsistency in findings eg Czech twins recover but not Genie however, were found at an earlier age and may have formed att to one another in absence of caregiver
Ethical- otherwise be unethical/ impractical to use other research methods
Issues with case studies as relying on retrospective memories that may be selective or incorrect, can’t know what happened before discovery, lack generalisability
Institutionalisation
Mix of privation and deprivation, distinct patterns of behaviour
Att of care provided by orphanages and residential children’s homes
Conducted in Romanian orphanages often
Rutter et al (1998) procedure
Whether loving and nurturing care could overturn effects of privation that children had suffered in Romanian orphanages
On going longitudinal study, orphans as ppts and 3 conditions:
1) adopted before 6months
2) 6months- 2years
3) adopted after 2years
DV- cognitive functioning, assessed height, head circumference and cognitive functioning on arrival to Britain at 4yrs
Used control group of 52 adopted British children in order to ascertain whether negative effects were due to separation from careers or institutional conditions in Romanian orphanages
Findings and conclusions of Rutter et als study
50% of Romanian orphans were retarded in cog functioning at initial assessment, underweight- control didn’t have these
At four years, Romanian orphans showed great improvement, those adopted before 6months doing as well as British
Negative effects of institutionalisation overcome by sensitive nurturing care, Sep from caters will not alone cause neg effects