KEY CASES/ LAW/ EXAMPLES (Judicial Precedent)๐ต๐ป Flashcards
Practise Statement 1966
Allows the Supreme Court to depart from itโs previous decisions.
Conway v Rimmer 1968
First use of the practise statement
Herrington v British Railways Board 1972
First major use of the practise statement. On duty of care owed to trespassers.
Shivpuri 1986
First use of the practise statement in Criminal Law
Pepper v Hart 1993
First use of hazard in a case to look at statutory interpretation.
R v G and R 2003
Practise statement used to overrule the decision in Caldwell on recklessness in criminal law.
Youngโs case 1979- allows the Court of Appeal to depart from itโs decision.
(1) The court is entitled and bound to decide which of two conflicting decisions of its
own it will follow ;
(2) the court is bound to refuse to follow a decision on its own which, though not expressly overruled, cannot, in its opinion, stand with a decision of the House of Lords ;
(3) the court is not bound to follow a decision of its own if it is satisfied that the decision was given per incuriam, e.g., where a statute or a rule having statutory effect which would have affected the decision was not brought to the attention of the earlier court.โ
Balfour and Balfour and Merritt v Merritt 1971
A case where the Judge distinguished.