Key cases for Offer and Acceptance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) 1 QB 256 CA

  1. What type of offer was it?
  2. Facts of the case?
  3. Court held?
A
  1. Unilateral in a newspaper
  2. Carlill had completed the instructions and still contracted influenza, attempted to sue the company for not giving her the promised money
  3. Held: The company had deposited £1,000 in bank to show a sign of good faith (must have meant it), Carlill’s acceptance was her meeting the conditions of the offer, offer can be made to the entire world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Invitations to treat in a self-service store:
Pharmaceutical society of GB v Boots Cash Chemist (1952) 2 QB 759

Court held?

A

Held: Shelf display was an ‘invitation to treat’, offer was made by the customer at the cash desk, as a pharmacist was advising at the cash desk no offence was committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Invitations to treat in a shop window:
Fisher v Bell (19610 QB 394

Court held?

A

Held: Display of an article in shop window was only an invitation to treat and not an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Invitation to treat in an advertisement/catalogue/website:
Partridge v Crittenden (1968) WLR 1204

Facts of the case?
Court held?

A

Magazine article states: ‘Bramblefinch cocks and hens, 25s each’, unlawfully offering wild birds for sale, in breach of Protection of Birds Act 1954

Held: Advert was an invitation to treat, some adverts can be an offer however, depends on PRECISE wording

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Invitation to treat - a mere supply of information:
Harvey v Facey (1893) A.C 552 P.C

Facts of the case?
Court held?

A

Telegram was sent asking the price of a property. Reply was simply ‘Lowest price for..is £900’. buyers replied ‘we agree to buy..for £900 asked by you’. Seller chose not to sell

Held: No contract because the seller’s reply to the telegram was a statement of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Invitations to treat - auctions:
Payne v Cave (1798) 100 E.R 502

Held?

A

Held: Auctioneer’s requests for bids are invitations, Bid may be revoked before acceptance, acceptance in an auction is when the auctioneer specifically says “sold”, bids = offers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

GNR v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16
Clarification?

Example case?

A

Referential bids are NOT VALID bids

Harvela Ltd v Royal Trust of Canada (1985) 3 WLR 276 (HL)
one party made an offer of $x above any other offer, unilateral offer to accept highest bidder, however referential bids are not valid so could not accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Example of a case when revocation is effective ONLY when it is COMMUNICATED to the offeree BEFORE acceptance

A

Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example case of when revocation can be communicated through a reliable third party

A

Dickenson v Dodds (1876) 2 ch D 463

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example case of revocation of unilateral offers

A

Shuey v USA 918750m23 Led 697

An offer made by advert in a newspaper can be revoked by a similar advert in the same newspaper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly