Justiciability Flashcards
when can a 3P have standing?
generally no standing unless
-special relationship between P and 3P, e.g., school and its students whose rights have been violated
-if 3P is injured and there is a substantial nexus b/t the party the statute is directed at and the prosecution
-3P unable to assert its own rights
-Special relationship b/t P and 3P
P’s injury adversely affects P’s relationship with 3P
when will a fed ct not hear a case because of FQ?
Fed ct will not take issues involving a matter for another branch of gov’t that the judicial process is inherently incapable of resolving and enforcing
Textually demonstrable constitutional commitment to other branches (Senate’s sole power to impeach), lack of judicial standards (partisan but not racial gerrymandering, foreign affairs)
what the requirements for there to be a case or controversy?
standing ripeness not mootness not political Q not abstention not adequate and independent state grounds
what are the requirements for standing?
Π’s actual or imminent injury,
2) causation,
redressability
req for org standing?
1) individual members have standing
2) interest asserted is germane to organization’s purpose
3) individual member participation is not required
® (there is no individualized injury, remedy would be the same to all members, or injunction would solve everyone’s problems)
® (no damages b/c each member would have to show damages)
can taxpayers show injury? legislators? constit loves?
no, except taxpayers can if litigating their own tax bill or challenging the way their taxes are promoting religion
when is a case ripe?
harm or imminent threat of harm.
whar the mootness exceptions?
§ “capable of repetition, yet evading review” (e.g., pregnancy can recur)
§ D voluntarily ceases its action upon lit commencing
§ Named P’s claim in class action is resolved but others remain
will court hear pq? how does the court decide?
Fed ct will not take issues involving a matter for another branch of gov’t that the judicial process is inherently incapable of resolving and enforcing
- Textually demonstrable constitutional commitment to other branches (Senate’s sole power to impeach),
- lack of judicial standards (partisan but not racial gerrymandering, foreign affairs)
what is abstention?
Fed ct will abstain (defer to state courts) if claim is based on an undecided issue of state law, strong state interests at stake
when will SCOTUS not hear a case from a state high court? what is this doctrine called?
vi. Adequate and independent state grounds:
SCOTUS will not hear a case from a state high court if its decision can be supported on state law grounds alone (even if federal Q involved), unless it was unclear whether based on state law alone, or state follows federal constitution (treat as federal law)
if a case from a state high court depends on interpretation of federal law to interpret the state law, is there AISG?
no
can private pt sue state govt? state officials?
no
as to officials, not in their official capacity
what are the exceptions to sovereign immunity?
- injunctive relief sought in suit brought against state official for enforcing law that violates federal law Young
- state official for acts outside the law
- state expressly consents, or
- based on 13A-15A enforcement powers
can Congress abrogate SI?
generally no, except a. Pursuant to bankruptcy clause
Enforcement of rights under 13, 14, 15A