Jurisdiction and Venue Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Federal subject matter jurisdictions occurs when?

4

A
  1. Federal Question
  2. Diversity Jurisdiction
  3. Supplemental
  4. Removal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Subject matter jurisdiction is…

A

the nature of the dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Federal Question Jurisdiction Requires

2

A
  1. Well Pleaded Complaint

2. Federal Question in Dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Well Pleaded Complaint requires

A

If the federal claim is in π’s affirmative side of the lawsuit

≠defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When a federal question is inside state law claims, federal jurisdiction when
(3)

A

This is permissible as long as the federal question:

(1) The federal law is actually in dispute,
(2) demands the expertise of federal judges, and ought to be resolved as uniformly as possible; and
(3) is not so commonly present in state law actions that federal courts would end up taking a large portion of state courts’ traditional jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A diversity action is a claim requirements

A
  1. Complete

2. Amount > 75k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Complete diversity exists as long as

A

no π and ∆ are citizens of the same state

Cannot have same state on both sides of the V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Key to Federal Question

A

Is there a federal question in the π’s complaint?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

For diversity actions, citizenship is counted at what time?

A

Diversity is measured at the time of filing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is complete diversity not required for jurisdiction?

3

A
  1. π class > 100
  2. Amount in controversy > 5 mil
  3. if any single member of the class is diverse from any single defendant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does amending complaints affect diversity?

A

Diversity is re-evaluated at the time of the amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where is a human being a citizen?

2

A

A human being’s state of citizenship is the state in which

(1) she resides + (2) intends to remain indefinitely (no present plans to leave).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A human being’s citizenship does not change until

A

They

  1. reside in a new place
  2. They intend to remain indefinitely in that new place
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where is a corporation a citizen?

2

A
  1. Where it is incorporated
    +
  2. Where it maintains its principal place of business
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where is a corp’s principal place of business

A

Where the executives do their business

“the brain/nerve center”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When evaluating diversity jurisdiction for a corporation, π must be diverse from

A

both the place of incorporation and the principal place of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Where is a unincorporated association a citizen?

A

=non-corporation (LLC, P’Ship)

Citizen of every state where their members are citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When litigation occurs through personal representatives. For the purpose of diversity jurisdiction, the key inquiry is:

A

Citizenship of the incapacitated party (the party in interest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Diversity Jurisdiction amount in controversy requires

A

the plaintiff’s allegation of her financial injury > 75k

unless it appears “to a legal certainty” that such allegations are incorrect –> As a matter of law you could not collect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Diversity Jurisdiction amount in controversy when there are multiple claims against the same ∆, what’s the amount?

A

Add all of the claims together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Diversity Jurisdiction amount in controversy when there are multiple claims against multiple ∆s, what’s the amount?

A

Do not aggregate the amounts to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Supplemental jurisdiction allows

A

A claim falling outside out of FQ or Diversity to piggy-back on a claim that does have FQ or Diversity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Supplemental Jurisdiction Steps

A

Step 1——Same Transaction?
Does the claim seeking piggy back jurisdiction arise from the same transaction or occurrence as another claim falling within federal question or diversity?

Step 2 ——Sneaky π?
If the anchor claim is FQ –> step 3

If anchor claim is Diversity –> π cannot use supplemental to sue third party defendants(∆ brings another ∆ in) or stacked parties (multiple ∆’s sued together).

Step 3——Good Reason to Give to State
Court may decline if:
(a) the piggy back claim involves a novel and complex issue of state law;
(b) the piggy back claim “substantially predominates” over the federal question or diversity claim;
(c) the court has dismissed the anchor claim; and
(d) in exceptional circumstances, where other compelling reasons exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Removal jurisdiction permits

A

permits a federal court to hear a case that was originally filed in state court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Removal is only an option for

A

Defendants

26
Q

Grounds for Removal

A

A defendant can remove a case from state to federal court if:
The originally Well Pleaded Complaint by πcould have been filed in federal court (FQ, Diversity, Supplemental)

27
Q

A ∆ cannot remove a case if

A

Home-State Defendant Rule

  1. federal jurisdiction would be grounded only in diversity jurisdiction, and
  2. The ∆ is a citizen of the state where the action is filed
28
Q

Rule for removal of multiple defendants

A

All must agree to removal

29
Q

A defendant must remove within

A

30 days of when grounds for removal became apparent (when served with process)

30
Q

If P sues multiple ∆’s, defendants must remove within

A

30 days from when the final ∆ is served (only the final ∆ can remove, others can join)

31
Q

If the removal to federal court would be based on diversity of citizenship, the defendant must remove the case:

A

Within 1 year of when the case is filed

  • generally happens when the πmakes a change to a lawsuit
  • The 30 day window of when the grounds for removal became apparent still applies
32
Q

To determine whether a federal court has Personal Jurisdiction over a particular party, you need to analyze two bodies of law:

A
  1. If the state court where the fed court sits could assert PJ
  2. Federal Constitutional Law
33
Q

To determine whether it may assert PJ over a party, the first question a federal court must ask is

A

If the state court could assert PJ, then the federal court may do so as well

34
Q

If the state court could assert PJ, then Fed can constitution authorizes PJ in one of five circumstances.
(5)

A

PJ Rarely Causes Severe Mental Strain.

  1. Residency
  2. Consent
  3. Service
  4. Minimum Contacts
  5. Substantial Business
35
Q

Residency satisfied in PJ if

A

Party is a resident in the state where the lawsuit is being filed

Residency = where they live

36
Q

Consent for PJ occurs in one of three ways:

A
  1. Appearance
    When party appears in court without objecting to PJ in initial filing or appearance
  2. Contract
    Signed contract with a choice of forum
  3. Appointment
    Appointed Agent in state where it is filed
37
Q

Service is satisfied in PJ if

A

Tag jurisdiction in the state where filed

38
Q

To hear a case, a federal court must have?

A
  1. Subject Matter Jurisdiction

2. Personal Jurisdiction

39
Q

Tag jurisdiction is not constitutional if?

2

A
  1. ∆coaxed or lured into the state

2. ∆ in state to participate in legal proceedings

40
Q

Minimum contacts for PJ is established if?

3

A

(a) the defendant has established a minimum contact with the forum state,
+
(b) the claim against him arises from that contact, and
+
(c) Jurisdictions will not offend Fair Play and Substantial Justice

41
Q

A defendant has minimum contacts with a particular state if

3

A
  1. he causes harm in the state,
  2. does business in the state,
  3. or has an interest in real property in the state.

∆ Does not have to be in the state
NEED Purposeful avail

42
Q

A lawsuit “arises from” a defendant’s contacts if the contacts:

A

Played a role in causing the lawsuit

43
Q

Substantial Business/General Jurisdiction for PJ established if

A

The business must be so significant that the company, though not incorporated or headquartered in the state, is essentially at home there*

Action does not need to arise out of the business, can be sued for anything there

44
Q

Venue dictates

A

dictates not the state in which a suit can occur, but the region within a particular state where a suit can occur. In federal court, this region is called a “judicial district.”

45
Q

SMJ Tells You
PJ Tells You
Venue Tells you

A

SMJ: Whether you can sue in Federal Court
PJ: The State where you can sue
Venue: What Judicial District you Can Sue in.

46
Q

The appropriate venue can be dictated by either:

2

A
  1. Residency of potential ∆’s if all from same state,
    and
  2. Location of events giving rise to the lawsuit
47
Q

Where all defendants reside in the same state, the plaintiff may lay venue

A

In the judicial district of any single ∆ resides

48
Q

For Venue, corporations reside

A

in any judicial district in which they are subject to personal jurisdiction

49
Q

For Personal Jurisdictions, non-corporation entities reside

A

in the state i which it maintains its principal place of business

50
Q

For Venue, non-corporation entities reside

A

in any judicial district in which they are subject to personal jurisdiction

51
Q

For Venue, PJ, SJM, natural persons reside

A

in the state in which they live and intend to remain indefinitely

52
Q

If the defendants reside in multiple states, venue will be dictated by

A

The location of the harm

  • Substantial part of event occurred; or,
  • Where the property is located
53
Q

Transferring venue may occur when

3

A
  1. Convenience
  2. Agreement
  3. Interest of Justice
54
Q

Transferring venue for convenience requirements (2)

A
  1. Venue must have been appropriate
    +
  2. Transfer is necessary for convience of the parties

≠ outside fed.

55
Q

Transferring venue by agreement requirement

A

If all parties consent, then can go anywhere

56
Q

Transferring venue by interest of justice requirement

A

If a plaintiff files suit in an improper venue,

  1. the court may dismiss the suit or,
  2. in the “interest of justice,” transfer the case to a venue where the case could have been filed originally.
57
Q

Forum Non Conveniens appropriate when

A

most convenient court in which to litigate a suit is not in the United States.

58
Q

What does a court do when Forum Non Conveniens is appropriate?

A

dismiss the suit without prejudice so that the plaintiff may refile the suit abroad if she desires.

59
Q

What types of actions cannot be brought in state court?

A

Actions that the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over

60
Q

In a statutory interpleader case, the court has jurisdiction where?

A

Nationwide