Juries 2/13 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the role of Juries?

A
  1. Crown Court, indictable or TEW when D pleads not guilty.
  2. Rules under Juries Act 1974
  3. 12 jurors in a jury
  4. Judge decide the points of law, jury decides the verdict
  5. At end of the trial the judge sums up, directing the jury on the law involved, insufficient evidence judge can direct the jury to find the D not guilty (direct acquittal)
  6. Retire to private room to decide if D is guilty or not. Contempt of Court Act 198 = anything discussed amongst the jurors cannot be disclosed outside the room
  7. Normally must come to a unanimous verdict but 11:1 or 10:2 also accepted, to prevent jury nobbling where jurors are influenced/intimidated to give certain verdict
  8. Judge must accept jury’s verdict even if they don’t agree with it, jury don’t have to give a reason
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What act do the rules concerning Juries come under?

A

Juries Act 1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To qualify for jury service, you must?

A
  • Age 18-75
  • On electoral register
  • Lived in UK 5yrs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can you be disqualified from jury service?

A

Permanently
-5+ years prison/life
-public protection
For 10 years
-served prison/suspended sentence
-had community order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What makes people ineligible/incapable of jury service?

A
  • Mental illnesses
  • Blind/deaf/don’t understand English
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How you be excused from jury service?

A

Member of armed forces, commanding officer must certify, application must be made to Central Summoning Bureau

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a Discretionary Excusal and how can you get one?

A

= Moved to later date
- Mother with baby
- Pre-booked holiday
- Exams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How are Juries selected and appointed?

A
  • Every 2 weeks names selected randomly from electoral register and letter sent to them
  • Many more than 12 selected as don’t know how many disqualified/discretionary excusal
  • Before arriving, jurors are vetted via basic criminal record check
  • Fined £1,000 for non-attendance
  • Lasts approx 2 weeks but possibly longer if case is complicated
  • At court, 15 names called from jury pool and 12 randomly selected by court clerk, opportunity to challenge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Challenge to the Array?

A
  • Under Sect 5 Juries Act 1974, whole jury can be objected if chosen in unrepresentative/biased way
  • Romford Jury = 9/12 from Romford, 2 on same street, jury was objected because had been selected in biased way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Challenge for Cause?

A
  • Challenges right of individual juror with valid reason
  • R v Wilson and Sprason = wife on prison officer because both D’s on remand in prison husband worked at. D’s convicted but COA quashed decision.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Prosecution’s right to Stand By?

A

P only, but a juror at back of the list so won’t be picked, don’t have to give a reason and used rarely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adv of Jury (Public Confidence)

A
  • ✅ Public Confidence in the System
    • Being tried by one’s peers seen as fundamental to democracy
    • Lord Devlin “lamp that shows that freedom lives”
    • Old system people have confidence in impartiality/fairness of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Adv of Jury (Jury Equity)

A
  • ✅ Jury Equity
    • Jurors don’t have to follow decisions from previous cases or Acts of Parliament
    • Don’t have to give reason for verdict so have freedom in decision making e.g. Ponting’s Case Ponting’s Case (1984)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Adv of Jury (Open system of justice)

A
  • ✅ Open System of Justice
    • Make legal system more open
    • Random process of selection ensures cross selection of society is selected and no individual is responsible for decision
    • Not case hardened
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Adv of Jury (Secrecy)

A
  • ✅ Secrecy of the Jury Room
    • Free from pressure, protected from outside influences
    • Free to make decisions unpopular with the public
    • The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 protects jury members because it’s illegal to intimidate/threaten jurors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Adv of Jury (Impartiality)

A
  • ✅ Impartiality
    • Jurors selected randomly, ensuring cross section of society, cancels out biases
    • Can’t be connected to anyone in the case to make it fair
    • Not case hardened
17
Q

Dis of Jury (Qualifications)

A
  • ❌ Lack Qualifications
    • Lack legal qualifications as no minimum educational standards
    • 3 requirements are very loose
18
Q

Dis of Jury (Peverse Decisions)

A
  • ❌ Perverse Decisions
    • Can ignore laws and make decisions that don;t appear justified even when case is clear-cut
    • E.g. Ponting’s Case
19
Q

Dis of Jury (bias)

A
  • ❌ Jury Bias
    • Some jurors are biased towards police, racially prejudice e.g. Sander v UK
    • Media coverage can influence jurors, especially in high profile cases
    • Too many people to allow for productive discussion
    • Hard to have everyone’s voices heard and understood
    • Dominant juror may take the lead and influence others decisions
20
Q

Dis of Jury (Secrecy)

A
  • ❌ Secrecy
    • As no reasons given for decision, no way to know if jury understood case
    • Makes it difficult to appeal because reason for decision isn’t known
    • E.g. R v Connor
21
Q

Dis of Jury (Unpopular)

A
  • ❌ Unpopular
    • Compulsory nature is unpopular, some jurors against the system, some rush verdict to get home
    • Results in unjust decisions
    • Can be a mental strain e.g. Rosemary West Case, may need counselling