Juries Flashcards
History
-11th century Trial by ordeal
-12th century trail by peers
-Bushells case 1670, independence of jury
-R v Wang 2005, judge cant direct a jury
Criminal court use
-decide if D is guilty or not
-Criminal justice act 2003, lone judge if jury tampered
R v Twomey 2009
-1% of criminal cases
-unanimous and majority verdict
Civil court use
-fewer than 1%
-decide for or against the claimant
Coroners court use
-death has occurred in a suspicious way
-death in police custody or prison
For example: Hillsborough disaster and princess Diana
Qualifications
-jury central summoning bureau
-random chosen people from electoral register
-18 to 75
-resident in UK for at least 5yrs since 13th birthday
Exceptions for not being on a jury
-mental disorder under criminal justice act 2003
-disqualified, forever if in prison for more than 5 years, 10yrs if on bail or suspended sentence
-excused, exams, blind or deaf, doesn’t speak English, member of forces
Fines
-non attendance must explain to the court
-if reason excepted then you are excused
-£1000 fine
-if failure to disclose you should be qualified then £5000
Vetting
-prosecution and defence have the right to see the list
-2 types of vetting
-routine police checks, R v Mason
-wider background checks
Selection
-15 chosen at random from jury pool
-Praying for a talesman, if not enough jurors people can be picked of the street
Challenging
-12/15 picked to from jury
-to the array
-for cause
-prosecution right to stand by
Challenging: to the array
S5 juries act 1974
-challenge to the whole jury if unrepresentative or bias
-Romford jury, 2 lived in 20 doors of each other
Challenging: for cause
-challenge to an individual juror
-R v Wilson and Sprason, girls husband worked at the place D had be held on remand
Challenging: right of stand by
-only available to prosecution
-puts juror to the end of the list
-do not have to provide a reason
-once complete the 12 jurors are sworn in under oath
Criminal role
-listen to evidence and sum up by the judge
-decide questions of fact
-retire to jury room to discuss in secret
-do not have to give reason for decision
Jury secrecy
-R v Young (Stephens)
jury tried case on matters other than evidence
-R v Karakaya
extraneous material have been introduced into the jury room